Egocentric network composition and structure relative to violence victimization among a sample of college students

References

• Voth Schrag RJ. Campus based sexual assault and dating violence: a review of study contexts and participants. Affilia. 2017;32(1):67–80. doi:10.1177/0886109916644644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiding MJ, Basile KC, Smith SG, Black MC, Mahendra RR. Intimate Partner Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data Elements, Version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Amar AF, Gennaro S. Dating violence in college women: associated physical injury, healthcare usage, and mental health symptoms. Nurs Res. 2005;54(4):235–242. doi:10.1097/00006199-200507000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick K, Krebs CP, Lindquist CH. Intimate partner violence victimization among undergraduate women at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Violence against Women. 2013;19(8):1014–1033. doi:10.1177/1077801213499243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanmer J, Stanko E. Stripping away the rhetoric of protection: violence to women, law and the state in Britain and the U.S.A. Int J Sociol Law. 1985;13(4):357–374.
   Google Scholar
• Kaukinen C. Dating violence among college students: the risk and protective factors. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15(4):283–296. doi:10.1177/1524838014521321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet Lond Engl. 2002;359(9314):1331–1336. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton MA, Green BL, Kaltman SI, Roesch DM, Zeffiro TA, Krause ED. Intimate partner violence, PTSD, and adverse health outcomes. J Interpers Violence. 2006;21(7):955–968. doi:10.1177/0886260506289178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, et al. Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(4):260–268. doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00514-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TW, Leung WC, Ng EHY, Ho PC. Quality of life of victims of intimate partner violence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;90(3):258–262. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiding MJ. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(8):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JC, Sabri B, Budhathoki C, Kaufman MR, Alhusen J, Decker MR. Unwanted sexual acts among university students: correlates of victimization and perpetration. J Interpers Violence. 2017. doi:10.1177/0886260517734221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley AH, Overstreet CM, Hawn SE, Kendler KS, Dick DM, Amstadter AB. Prevalence and predictors of sexual assault among a college sample. J Am Coll Health. 2017;65(1):41–49. doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1235578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization: national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;63(SS08):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HK, Laurent HK, Capaldi DM, Feingold A. Men's aggression toward women: a 10-year panel study. J Marriage Fam. 2008;70(5):1169–1187. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00558.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland MA, Fantasia HC, Hutchinson MK, Katz J. Individual and institutional predictors of IPV/SV screening in college health centers. J Interpers Violence. 2017. doi:10.1177/0886260517741211
   Google Scholar
• Duval A, Lanning BA, Patterson MS. A systematic review of dating violence risk factors among undergraduate college students. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020;21(3):567–585. doi:10.1177/1524838018782207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul EL, Hayes KA. The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2002;19(5):639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ven TV, Beck J. Getting drunk and hooking up: an exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociol Spectr. 2009;29(5):626–648. doi:10.1080/02732170903051417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadine M, Patterson MS, Brown S, Nelon J, Lanning B, Johnson DM. Predicting emotional abuse among a sample of college students. J Am Coll Health. 2020;1–9. doi:10.1080/07448481.2020.1740709
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson MS, Goodson P. Social network analysis for assessing college-aged adults' health: a systematic review. J Am Coll Health. 2019;67(1):59–67. doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1462820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Messman-Moore TL. Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students' willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(3):503–517. doi:10.1177/0886260509334400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman SE, Townsend SM, Filipas HH, Starzynski LL. Structural models of the relations of assault severity, social support, avoidance coping, self-blame, and PTSD among sexual assault survivors. Psychol Women Q. 2007;31(1):23–37. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidycz CA, Orchowski LM, Berkowitz AD. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: an evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence against Women. 2011;17(6):720–742. doi:10.1177/1077801211409727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilmartin C, Smith T, Green A, Heinzen H, Kuchler M, Kolar D. A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles. 2008;59(3-4):264–273. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9446-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennicke A, Kennedy SC, Gromer J, Klem-O’Connor M. Evaluation of a social norms sexual violence prevention marketing campaign targeted toward college men: attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors over 5 years. J Interpers Violence. 2018. doi:10.1177/0886260518780411
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ullman SE. Social support and recovery from sexual assault. Aggress Violent Behav. 1999;4(3):343–358. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Plante EG. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. J Community Psychol. 2007;35(4):463–481. doi:10.1002/jcop.20159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker AL, Fisher BS, Bush HM, et al. Evaluation of the green dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Women. 2015;21(12):1507–1527. doi:10.1177/1077801214545284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MS, Prochnow T, Goodson P. The spread and utility of social network analysis across a group of health behavior researchers. Health Behav Res. 2019;2(4). doi:10.4148/2572-1836.1063
   Google Scholar
• Valente TW. Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Perry BL, Pescosolido BA, Borgatti SP. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(1):415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D. Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: a large-scale networked experiment. Manag Sci. 2014;60(6):1352–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochnow T, Patterson MS, Umstattd Meyer MR. A social network approach to analyzing body dissatisfaction among sorority members using two network generators. J Am Coll Health. 2019;1–9. doi:10.1080/07448481.2019.1657121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MS, Goodson P. Using social network analysis to better understand compulsive exercise behavior among a sample of sorority members. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(5):360–367. doi:10.1123/jpah.2016-0336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden PV. Network data and measurement. Annu Rev Sociol. 1990;16(1):435–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing Social Networks. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel MK, Clifton AD, MacKillop J, Goodie AS. A social network analysis approach to alcohol use and co-occurring addictive behavior in young adults. Addict Behav. 2015;51:72–79. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MS, Goodson P. The role of ego networks in compulsive exercise behavior among a sample of college sorority women. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(10):755–762. doi:10.1123/jpah.2017-0570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MS, Gagnon LR, Vukelich A, Brown SE, Nelon JL, Prochnow T. Social networks, group exercise, and anxiety among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2019;1–9. doi:10.1080/07448481.2019.1679150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reifman A, Watson WK, McCourt A. Social networks and college drinking: probing processes of social influence and selection. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006;32(6):820–832. doi:10.1177/0146167206286219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartout KM. The company they keep: how peer networks influence male sexual aggression. Psychol Violence. 2013;3(2):157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamkin J, Campbell WK, vanDellen MR, Miller JD. An exploration of the correlates of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in romantic relationships: homophily, partner characteristics, and dyadic adjustment. Personal Individ Differ. 2015;79:166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CA, Raghavan C. Sexual orientation, social support networks, and dating violence in an ethnically diverse group of college students. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2012;24(1):1–22. doi:10.1080/10538720.2011.611107
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Published online 2000. doi:10.1037/e514172006-001
   Google Scholar
• Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DA, Grant BF, Stinson FS, Zhou Y. Effectiveness of the derived alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the US general population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(5):844–854. doi:10.1097/01.alc.0000164374.32229.a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack WF, Hansen BE, Hopper AB, et al. Some types of hookups may be riskier than others for campus sexual assault. Psychol Trauma. 2016;8(4):413–420. doi:10.1037/tra0000090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP. E-NET Software for the Analysis of Ego-Network Data. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Burt RS. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. 1. Harvard Univ. Press paperback ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. IMB SPSS Statistics for Windows. Houston, TX: IRB Corporation; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Godley J. Preference or propinquity? The relative contribution of selection and opportunity to friendship homophily in college. Connections. 2008;1(1):65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Evans MA, Feder GS. Help-seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support. Health Expect. 2016;19(1):62–73. doi:10.1111/hex.12330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGuiseppi GT, Meisel MK, Balestrieri SG, et al. Resistance to peer influence moderates the relationship between perceived (but not actual) peer norms and binge drinking in a college student social network. Addict Behav. 2018;80:47–52. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder E, Eisikovits Z. Battered women's entrapment in shame: a phenomenological study. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2003;73(4):355–366. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.73.4.355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente TW. Network Models for Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Hampton Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Weston R. Insecure attachment mediates effects of partners’ emotional abuse and violence on women’s relationship quality. J Fam Viol. 2008;23(6):483–493. doi:10.1007/s10896-008-9176-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew K, Henderson A, Dutton D. Insecure attachment and abusive intimate relationships. In: Clulow C, ed. Adult Attachment and Couple Psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012:67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton DG. The Abusive Personality: Violence and Control in Intimate Relationships. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Gondolf EW, Fisher ER. Battered Women as Survivors: An Alternative to Treating Learned Helplessness. New York, NY: Lexington Books/D.C. Health and Com; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards KM, Dardis CM, Gidycz CA. Women’s disclosure of dating violence: a mixed methodological study. Fem Psychol. 2012;22(4):507–517. doi:10.1177/0959353511422280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylaska KM, Edwards KM. Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: a review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15(1):3–21. doi:10.1177/1524838013496335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyard VL, Ward S, Cohn ES, Plante EG, Moorhead C, Walsh W. Unwanted sexual contact on campus: a comparison of women's and men's experiences. Violence Vict. 2007;22(1):52–70. doi:10.1891/vv-v22i1a004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton TE, Simons LG. Sexual assault among college students: family of origin hostility, attachment, and the hook-up culture as risk factors. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24(10):2827–2840. doi:10.1007/s10826-014-0087-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin CA. Physically forced, alcohol-induced, and verbally coerced sexual victimization: assessing risk factors among university women. J Crim Justice. 2010;38(2):149–159. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klipfel KM, Claxton SE, van Dulmen MHM. Interpersonal aggression victimization within casual sexual relationships and experiences. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(3):557–569. doi:10.1177/0886260513505207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impett EA, Peplau LA. Sexual compliance: gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. J Sex Res. 2003;40(1):87–100. doi:10.1080/00224490309552169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snapp S, Lento R, Ryu E, Rosen KS. Why do they hook up? Attachment style and motives of college students: why do they hook up? Pers Relationship. 2014;21(3):468–481. doi:10.1111/pere.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman R. Measuring rape and sexual assault: successive approximations to consensus. National Academy of Sciences; 2012. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_080063.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garcia JR, Reiber C, Massey SG, Merriwether AM. Sexual hookup culture: a review. Rev Gen Psychol. 2012;16(2):161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2007;12(4):1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:343–350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar