Non-linear effects of absolute risk information on individuals’self-evaluation, affective responses, and behavioral intentionsof precautionary actions against skin cancer

References

• American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson TM, Salz T, Touza KK, Li Y, Hay JL. Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2015;38(6):837–850. doi:10.1007/s10865-015-9668-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, et al. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res. 2020;23(7–8):994–1006. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotle S, Murray-Tuite P, Singh K. Influenza risk perception and travel-related health protection behavior in the US: insights for the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;5:100127. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris P, Smith V. When the risks are low: the impact of absolute and comparative information on disturbance and understanding in US and UK samples. Psychol Health. 2005;20(3):319–330. doi:10.1080/08870440512331317689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein W. Objective standards are not enough: affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral reponses to social comparison information. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72(4):763–774. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieden E, Philipsen P, Sandby-Moller J, Wulf H. Sunburn related to UV radiation exposure, age, sex, occupation, and sun bed use based on time-stamped personal dosimetry and sun behavior diaries. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(4):482–488. doi:10.1001/archderm.141.4.482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures 2020. Indoor tanning restrictions for minors: A state-by-state comparison. https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/indoor-tanning-restrictions.aspx. Updated December 11, 2020. Accessed February 19, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Guy GP, Watson M, Seidenberg AB, Hartman AM, Holman DM, Perna F. Trends in indoor tanning and its association with sunburn among US adults. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6):1191–1193. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar SM, Myrick JG, Morales-Pico B, Thomas NE. Development and validation of the comprehensive indoor tanning expectations scale. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):512–521. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.9086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg AB, Noar SM, Sontag JM. Support for tanning bed control policies among female university students. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(4):e121–e122. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogel J, Krausz F. Watching reality television beauty shows is associated with tanning lamp use and outdoor tanning among college students. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(5):784–789. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcioppolo N, Orrego Dunleavy V, Yang Q. How do perceived descriptive norms influence indoor tanning intentions? An application of the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun. 2017;32(2):230–239. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1120697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buster KJ, You Z, Fouad M, Elmets C. Skin cancer risk perceptions: a comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(5):771–779. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pask EB, Rawlins ST. Men’s intentions to engage in behaviors to protect against human papillomavirus (HPV): testing the risk perception attitude framework. Health Commun. 2016;31(2):139–149. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.940670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So J, Kuang K, Cho H. Reexamining fear appeal models from cognitive appraisal theory and functional emotion theory perspectives. Commun Monogr. 2016;83(1):120–144. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1044257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein WM. Self-prescriptive, perceived, and actual attention to comparative risk information. Psychol Health. 2003;18(5):625–643. doi:10.1080/0887044031000118465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter RA, Kessels LT, Peters GJY, Kok G. Sixty years of fear appeal research: current state of the evidence. Int J Psychol. 2014;49(2):63–70. doi:10.1002/ijop.12042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freimuth VS, Jamison A, Hancock G, Musa D, Hilyard K, Quinn SC. The role of risk perception in flu vaccine behavior among African-American and white adults in the United States. Risk Anal. 2017;37(11):2150–2163. doi:10.1111/risa.12790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains SA, Hingle MD, Surdeanu M, Bell D, Kobourov SA. Test of the risk perception attitude framework as a message tailoring strategy to promote diabetes screening. Health Commun. 2019;34(6):672–679. doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1431024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer R, Thomas R, Maswera R, Kadzura N, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S. Relationships between changes in HIV risk perception and condom use in East Zimbabwe 2003–2013: population-based longitudinal analyses. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–14. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08815-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, Wei J, Zhao D, Vinnikova A, Li L, Wang S. Communicating online diet-nutrition information and influencing health behavioral intention: the role of risk perceptions, problem recognition, and situational motivation. J Health Commun. 2018;23(7):624–633. doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1500657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39(5):806–820. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein ND, Atwood K, Puleo E, Fletcher R, Colditz G, Emmons KM. Colon cancer: risk perceptions and risk communication. J Health Commun. 2004;9:53–65. doi:10.1080/10810730490271647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan X, Dahlstrom MF, Richards A, Rangarajan S. Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine. Health Commun. 2015;30(3):301–308. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.888629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstock I. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):328–335. doi:10.1177/109019817400200403.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers R. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975;52:596–604.
   Google Scholar
• Popova L, Owusu D, Weaver SR, et al. Affect, risk perception, and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a population study of US adults. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–15. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5306-z.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjit YS, Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Rimal RN. Self-determination theory and risk behavior in a collectivistic society: preventing reckless driving in urban Nepal. J Health Commun. 2017;22(8):672–681. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1341569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan EYY, Huang Z, Lo ESK, Hung KKC, Wong ELY, Wong SYS. Sociodemographic predictors of health risk perception, attitude and behavior practices associated with health-emergency disaster risk management for biological hazards: the case of COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, SAR China. IJERPH. 2020;17(11):3869. doi:10.3390/ijerph17113869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise T, Zbozinek TD, Michelini G, Hagan CC. Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. PsyArXiv. 2020. doi:10.31234/osf.io/dz428.
   Google Scholar
• Sniehotta F, Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Lippke S. Discontinuity patters in stages of the precaution adoption process model: meat consumption during a livestock epidemic. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:221–235. doi:10.1348/135910705X26137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meczkowski EJ, Dillard JP, Shen L. Threat appeals and persuasion: seeking and finding the elusive curvilinear effect. Commun Monogr. 2016;83(3):373–395. doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1158412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun J, Nan X. Comparative risk assessment and cessation information seeking among smokeless tobacco users. Addict Behav. 2016;80:14–21. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin HJ, Kim JI. Meaning of happiness based on ERG theory in middle-aged Korean women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2019;25(3):315–328. doi:10.4069/kjwhn.2019.25.3.315.
   Google Scholar
• Svedberg P, Bardage C, Sandin S, Pedersen N. A prospective study of health, life-style and psychosocial predictors of self-rated health. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:767–776. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9064-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Cai X. The role of risk, efficacy, and anxiety in smokers’ cancer information seeking. Health Commun. 2009;24:259–269. doi:10.1080/10410230902805932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Nan X. The influence of absolute and comparative risk perceptions on cervical cancer screening and the mediating role of cancer worry. J Health Commun. 2016;21(1):100–108. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1033114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7(2):117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S. 1981. A categorization approach to stereotyping. In:Hamilton DL, ed. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1981:88–114.
   Google Scholar
• Simon H. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev. 1956;63:129–138. doi:10.1037/h0042769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Ruter K, Epstude K. The why, who, and how of social comparison: a social-cognition perspective. In: Guimond S, ed. Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding Cognition, Intergroup Relations and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Burrus J. Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism). J Exp Soc Psychol. 2004;40(3):332–340. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg L, Holm LE, Ullén H, Brandberg Y. Tanning and risk perception in adolescents. Health Risk Soc. 2004;6(1):81–94. doi:10.1080/1369857042000193020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus IM, Klein WM. Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer. J Health Commun. 2006;11(4):391–407. doi:10.1080/10810730600671870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Lew RA, Song V, Cook VA. Factors associated with skin cancer prevention practices in a multiethnic population. Health Educ Behav. 1999;26(3):344–359. doi:10.1177/109019819902600305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S. Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Social Pyschol. 2000;30(1):106–143. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Schenfeld E, Weinstock M, Layi G, Kidd J, Shigaki D. Development and reliability of a brief skin cancer risk assessment tool. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27:311–315. doi:10.1016/S0361-090X(03)00094-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gavin A, Boyle R, Donnelly D, et al. Trends in skin cancer knowledge, sun protection practices and behaviours in the Northern Ireland population. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(3):408–412. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker ML, Berkowitz Z, Watson M. Intentional outdoor tanning in the United States: results from the 2015 Summer Consumer Styles survey. Prev Med. 2017;101:137–141. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill GA. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res. 1979;16(1):64–73. doi:10.1177/002224377901600110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay J, Buckley T, Ostroff J. The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. J Psychol Oncol. 2005;14:517–534. doi:10.1002/pon.864.
   Google Scholar