194
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Article

Keyboard coercion: Online and face-to-face sexual aggression in a college sample

, PhDORCID Icon & , PhDORCID Icon
Pages 1480-1489 | Received 27 Sep 2021, Accepted 01 May 2022, Published online: 03 Jun 2022

References

  • Sawyer AN, Smith ER, Benotsch EG. Dating application use and sexual risk behavior among young adults. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2018;15(2):183–191. doi:10.1007/s13178-017-0297-6.
  • Powell A, Henry N. Digital Harassment and Abuse of Adult Australians: A Summary Report. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University; 2019.
  • Lauckner C, Truszczynski N, Lambert D, et al. Catfishing,” cyberbullying, and coercion: an exploration of the risks associated with dating app use among rural sexual minority males. J Gay Lesbian Mental Health. 2019;23(3):289–306. doi:10.1080/19359705.2019.1587729.
  • Patel U, Roesch R. The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022;23(2):428–443. doi:10.1177/1524838020958057.
  • Cheyne N, Guggisberg M. Stalking: an age old problem with new expressions in the digital age. Violence against Women in the 21st Century: Challenges and Future Directions. Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Centre for Domestic and Family Violence Research, CQU; 2018;161–190.
  • Fernet M, Lapierre A, Hébert M, Cousineau M. A systematic review of literature on cyber intimate partner victimization in adolescent girls and women. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;100:11–25. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.005.
  • Melander LA, Marganski AJ. Cyber and in-person intimate partner violence victimization: examining maladaptive psychosocial and behavioral correlates. Cyberpsychology. 2020;14(1):1–9. doi:10.5817/CP2020-1-1.
  • Ehman AC, Lair EC, Gross A. The relationship between trait impulsivity and cyberbullying behavior is accounted for by sensation seeking. J Bullying Soc Aggress. 2018;2(1):80–87.
  • Lyndon A, Bonds-Raacke J, Cratty A. College students’ Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14(12):711–716. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0588.
  • Reed L, Tolman R, Ward L. Snooping and sexting: digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence against Women. 2016;22(13):1556–1576. doi:10.1177/1077801216630143.
  • Halligan C, Knox D, Brinkley J. Trapped: Technology as a barrier to leaving an abusive relationship. J College Stud. 2013;47(4):644–648.
  • Cripps J, Stermac L. Cyber-sexual violence and negative emotional states among women in a Canadian university. Int J Cyber Criminol. 2018;12(1):171–186.
  • Gassó AM, Mueller-Johnson K, Montiel, I, Sexting. online sexual victimization, and psychopathology correlates by sex: depression, anxiety, and global psychopathology. IJERPH. 2020;17(3):1018. doi:10.3390/ijerph17031018.
  • Sambasivan N, Batool A, Ahmed N, et al. “They don’t leave us alone anywhere we go”: Gender and Digital Abuse in South Asia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY; 2019; (pp. 1–14). doi:10.1145/3290605.3300232.
  • Thompson M, Morrison D. Prospective predictors of technology-based sexual coercion by college males. Psychol Violence. 2013;3(3):233–246.
  • Ybarra M, Mitchell K. How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics. 2008;121(2):e350–357. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0693.
  • Scholly K, Katz A, Gascoigne J, Holck P. Using social norms theory to explain perceptions and sexual health behaviors of undergraduate college students: an exploratory study. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53(4):159–166.
  • Borsari B, Carey K. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64(3):331–341.
  • Larimer M, Turner A, Mallett K, Geisner I. Predicting drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems among fraternity and sorority members: examining the role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Psychol Addict Behav. 2004;18(3):203–212.
  • Neighbors C, Lee C, Lewis M, Fossos N, Larimer M. Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):556–565.
  • Dardis C, Murphy M, Bil A, Gidycz C. An investigation of the tenets of social norms theory as they relate to sexually aggressive attitudes and sexual assault perpetration: a comparison of men and their friends. Psychol Violence. 2016;6(1):163–171. doi:10.1037/a0039443.
  • Zounlome NO, Wong YJ. Addressing male-targeted university sexual aggression: an experimental evaluation of a social norms approach. Psychol Men Masc. 2019;20(4):528–540. doi:10.1037/men0000181.
  • Brown AL, Messman-Moore TL. Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students’ willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(3):503–517.
  • Olmstead S, Pasley K, Fincham F. Hooking up and penetrative hookups: correlates that differentiate college men. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(4):573–583. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9907-9.
  • Fair C, Vanyur J. Sexual coercion, verbal aggression, and condom use consistency among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(4):273–280.
  • Flack WF, Daubman KA, Caron ML, et al. Consequences of unwanted sex among university students: hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. J Interpers Violence. 2007;22(2):139–157.
  • Brem MJ, Florimbio AR, Grigorian H, et al. Cyber abuse among men arrested for domestic violence: cyber monitoring moderates the relationship between alcohol problems and intimate partner violence. Psychol Violence. 2019;9(4):410–418. doi:10.1037/vio0000130.
  • Strang E, Peterson Z, Hill Y, Heiman J. Discrepant responding across self-report measures of men’s coercive and aggressive sexual strategies. J Sex Res. 2013;50(5):458–469.
  • Koss M, Oros C. Sexual experiences survey: a research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982;50(3):455–457.
  • Saunders J, Aasland O, Babor T, De la Fuente J, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption–II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.
  • Gual A, Segura L, Contel M, Heather N, Colom J. Audit-3 and audit-4: effectiveness of two short forms of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37(6):591–596.
  • Doane A, Kelley M, Chiang E, Padilla M. Development of the cyberbullying experiences survey. Emerging Adulthood. 2013;1(3):207–218. doi:10.1177/2167696813479584.
  • Antony M, Bieling P, Cox B, Enns M, Swinson R. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176–181. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.
  • Sinclair SJ, Siefert CJ, Slavin-Mulford JM, Stein MB, Renna M, Blais MA. Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of US adults. Eval Health Prof. 2012;35(3):259–279. doi:10.1177/0163278711424282.
  • Hays RD, DiMatteo MR. A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987;51(1):69–81.
  • Reynolds WM. Development of reliable and valid short forms of the MarloweâCrowne Social Desirability Scale. J Clin Psychol. 1982;38(1):119–125. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I.
  • Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd ed.; 2019. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Jaffe AE, Cero I, DiLillo D. The# MeToo movement and perceptions of sexual assault: college students’ recognition of sexual assault experiences over time. Psychol Violence. 2021;11(2):209.
  • Alaggia R, Wang S. “I never told anyone until the #metoo movement”: what can we learn from sexual abuse and sexual assault disclosures made through social media? ”: Child Abuse Negl. 2020;103:104312. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104312.
  • Ehman AC, Gross A. Sexual Cyberbullying: Review, critique, & future directions. Aggress Violent Behav. 2019;44:80–87. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.11.001.
  • Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnall SH, Bruce C, Townsend R, Thomas G, Lee H. Westat, Inc. Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct; 2015.
  • Humphrey JA, White JW. Women’s vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2000;27(6):419–424.
  • Segal DL. Self-reported history of sexual coercion and rape negatively impacts resilience to suicide among women students. Death Stud. 2009;33(9):848–855.
  • Thompson MP, Koss MP, Kingree JB, Goree J, Rice J. A prospective mediational model of sexual aggression among college men. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(13):2716–2734.
  • McCauley J, Ruggiero KJ, Resnick HS, Conoscenti LM, Kilpatrick DG. Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape in relation to substance use problems: results from a national sample of college women. Addict Behav. 2009;34(5):458–462.
  • Campbell M, Spears B, Slee P, Butler D, Kift S. Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation. Emot Behav Diffic. 2012;17(3-4):389–401. doi:10.1080/13632752.2012.704316.
  • Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(1 Suppl):S13–S20.
  • Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behav. 2008;29(2):129–156. doi:10.1080/01639620701457816.
  • Buchwald E, Fletcher PR, Roth M, eds. Transforming a rape culture (revised edition). Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions; 2005.
  • Swartout KM, Swartout AG, Brennan CL, White JW. Trajectories of male sexual aggression from adolescence through college: a latent class growth analysis. Aggress Behav. 2015;41(5):467–477.
  • Boserup B, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(12):2753–2755.
  • Roesch E, Amin A, Gupta J, García-Moreno C. Violence against women during covid-19 pandemic restrictions. BMJ 2020;369:m1712. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1712.
  • Boxall H, Morgan A, Brown R. The prevalence of domestic violence among women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australas Polic. 2020;12(3):38–46.
  • Citron D, Franks M. Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review. 2014;49:345–391.
  • Coulter RW, Mair C, Miller E, Blosnich JR, Matthews DD, McCauley HL. Prevalence of past-year sexual assault victimization among undergraduate students: exploring differences by and intersections of gender identity, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity. Prev Sci. 2017;18(6):726–736. doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0762-8.
  • Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Barry JE, et al. Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: a comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30(4):580–600.
  • Martin-Storey A, Paquette G, Bergeron M, et al. Sexual violence on campus: differences across gender and sexual minority status. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(6):701–707.
  • Harris BA, Woodlock D. Digital coercive control: insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. Br J Criminol. 2019;59(3):530–550. doi:10.1093/bjc/azy052.
  • Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J. Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies and bully–victims. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34(1):63–70. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032.
  • Jatmiko MI, Syukron M, Mekarsari Y. Covid-19, harassment and social media: a study of gender-based violence facilitated by technology during the pandemic. JSM. 2020;4(2):319–347. doi:10.26740/jsm.v4n2.p319-347.
  • Sorenson SB, Sinko L, Berk RA. The endemic amid the pandemic: seeking help for violence against women in the initial phases of COVID-19. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(9-10):4899–4915.
  • Daigle LE, Hancock KP, Chafin TC. CoViD-19 and its link to victimization among college students. Am J Crim Justice. 2021;46(5):683–703.
  • Barlett CP, Simmers MM, Roth B, Gentile D. Comparing cyberbullying prevalence and process before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Soc Psychol. 2021;161(4):408–418.
  • Bennett ER, Snyder S, Cusano J, et al. Supporting survivors of campus dating and sexual violence during COVID-19: a social work perspective. Soc Work Health Care. 2021;60(1):106–116.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.