Nonparametric estimation of mediation effects with a general treatment

References

• Ai, C., Huang, L., Zhang, Z. ( 2022). A simple and efficient estimation of average treatment effects in models with unmeasured confounders. Statistica Sinica 32(3).
   Google Scholar
• Ai, C., Linton, O., Motegi, K., Zhang, Z. ( 2021). A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models. Quantitative Economics 12(3):779–816. doi:10.3982/QE1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai, C., Linton, O., Zhang, Z. ( 2022). Estimation and inference for the counterfactual distribution and quantile functions in continuous treatment models. Journal of Econometrics 228(1):39–61. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. W. K. ( 1991). Asymptotic normality of series estimators for nonparametric and semiparametric regression models. Econometrica 59(2):307. doi:10.2307/2938259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.11733806354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D. ( 2010). Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. Journal of Econometrics 155(2):138–154. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K., Imai, K., Yam, S., Zhang, Z. ( 2016). Efficient nonparametric estimation of causal mediation effects, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1601.03501.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C. G., Yam, S. C. P., Zhang, Z. ( 2016). Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology 78(3):673–700. doi:10.1111/rssb.1212927346982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. ( 2007). Large sample sieve estimation of semi-nonparametric models. Handbook of Econometrics 6:5549–5632.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Hong, H., Tarozzi, A. ( 2008). Semiparametric efficiency in gmm models with auxiliary data. The Annals of Statistics 36(2):808–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov, V., Fernández-Val, I., Melly, B. ( 2013). Inference on counterfactual distributions, Econometrica 81:2205–2268.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, K., Lee, Y.-Y. ( 2020). Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2004.03036.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, S. G., Hsu, Y.-C. ( 2014). Estimation and inference for distribution functions and quantile functions in treatment effect models. Journal of Econometrics 178:383–397. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Lee, Y.-Y., Gou, M. ( 2019). Regression discontinuity designs with a continuous treatment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 118:208–21. Available at SSRN 3167541.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Gijbels, I. ( 1996). Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Vol. 66. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, C., Hazlett, C., Imai, K. ( 2018). Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: Application to the efficacy of political advertisements. Annals of Applied Statistics 12(1):156–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frölich, M., Huber, M. ( 2017). Direct and indirect treatment effects–causal chains and mediation analysis with instrumental variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 79(5):1645–1666. doi:10.1111/rssb.12232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvao, A. F., Wang, L. ( 2015). Uniformly semiparametric efficient estimation of treatment effects with a continuous treatment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110(512):1528–1542. doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.978005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetgeluk, S., Vansteelandt, S., Goetghebeur, ELS. ( 2008). Estimation of controlled direct effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 70(5):1049–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00673.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, J. ( 1998). On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica 66(2):315. doi:10.2307/2998560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W. ( 2004). Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives, In: Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L., eds., The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., Ridder, G. ( 2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, G., Deutsch, J., Hill, H. D. ( 2015). Ratio-of-mediator-probability weighting for causal mediation analysis in the presence of treatment-BY-mediator interaction. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 40(3):307–340. doi:10.3102/1076998615583902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-C., Huber, M., Lai, T.-C. ( 2018). Nonparametric estimation of natural direct and indirect effects based on inverse probability weighting. Journal of Econometric Methods 8(1).
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-C., Lai, T.-C. ( 2018). Treatment effect models: A brief review. Jing Ji Lun Wen Cong Kan 46(4):501–521.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, WEI., Linton, O., Zhang, Z. ( 2022). A unified framework for specification tests of continuous treatment effect models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 40(4):1817–1830. doi:10.1080/07350015.2021.1981915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. ( 2014). Identifying causal mechanisms (primarily) based on inverse probability weighting. Journal of Applied Econometrics 29(6):920–943. doi:10.1002/jae.2341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M., Hsu, Y., Lee, Y., Lettry, L. ( 2020). Direct and indirect effects of continuous treatments based on generalized propensity score weighting. Journal of Applied Econometrics 35(7):814–840. doi:10.1002/jae.2765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D. ( 2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods 15(4):309–334. doi:10.1037/a002076120954780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T. ( 2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review 105(4):765–789. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., Yamamoto, T. ( 2010). Identification, inference, and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science 25(1):51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Van Dyk, D. A. ( 2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99(467):854–866. doi:10.1198/016214504000001187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, M. M., Small, D., Hsu, C.-Y. ( 2007). Defining and estimating intervention effects for groups that will develop an auxiliary outcome. Statistical Science 22(1):74–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. H., Ma, Z., McHugh, M. D., Small, D. S. ( 2017). Nonparametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology 79(4):1229–1245. doi:10.1111/rssb.1221228989320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., Lemieux, T. ( 2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):281–355. doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-Y. ( 2018). Efficient propensity score regression estimators of multivalued treatment effects for the treated. Journal of Econometrics 204(2):207–222. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewbel, A., Linton, O. ( 2007). Nonparametric matching and efficient estimators of homothetically separable functions. Econometrica 75(4):1209–1227. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00787.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Racine, J. S. ( 2006). Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Shen, J., Barfield, R., Schwartz, J., Baccarelli, A. A., Lin, X. ( 2022). Large-scale hypothesis testing for causal mediation effects with applications in genome-wide epigenetic studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 117(537):67–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey, W. K. ( 1994). The asymptotic variance of semiparametric estimators. Econometrica 62(6):1349. doi:10.2307/2951752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey, W. K. ( 1997). Convergence rates and asymptotic normality for series estimators. Journal of Econometrics 79(1):147–168. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00011-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. ( 2001). Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Articial Intelligence, 411–420. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, J. M., Greenland, S. ( 1992). Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 3(2):143–155. doi:10.1097/00001648-199203000-000131576220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., McConnell, S. ( 2008). Does job corps work? impact findings from the national job corps study. American Economic Review 98(5):1864–1886. doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. ( 1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Xu, L., Gretton, A. ( 2021). Kernel methods for multistage causal inference: Mediation analysis and dynamic treatment effects, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2111.03950.
   Google Scholar
• Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., Shpitser, I. ( 2012). Semiparametric theory for causal mediation analysis: Efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. The Annals of Statistics 40(3):1816–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderweele, T. ( 2015). Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. J. ( 2009). Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 20(1):18–26. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818f69ce19234398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderweele, T. J., Vansteelandt, S. ( 2010). Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. American Journal of Epidemiology 172(12):1339–1348. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq33221036955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar