Computerized Versus Paper-and-Pencil Assessment of Self-Concept: Score Comparability and Respondent Preferences

REFERENCES

• American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Standards and Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessments. (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for Macintosh users guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1954a). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: I. Effects of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 290–302.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1954b). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 484–498.
   Google Scholar
• Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd. ed., pp. 367–407). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. B. (1979). The self-concept: Theory, measurement, development and behavior. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N. (1987). Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioners guide. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Methodological issues and selected instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coopersmith, S. A. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Drasgow, F., & Olsen-Buchanan, J. B. (Eds.). (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. R., & Corbin, C. B. (1989). The Physical Self-Perception Profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1986a). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1986b). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 136–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality research form manual. NewYork: Research Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 17–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1988). Multitrait—multimatrix analyses. In J. P. Reeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 570–580). New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1992a). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1992b). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1992c). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & O'Neil, R. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzeo, J., & Harvey, A. L. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests: A review of the literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, B., & Harter, S. (1986). Manual for the Adult Self-Perception Profile. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Neemann, J., & Harter, S. (1986). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for College Students. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires (pp. 143–165). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, E. (1969). Manual for the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, E.V. (1984). Piers—Harris Children's Self-concept Scale—Revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretation. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simola, S. K., & Holden, R. R. (1992). Equivalence of computerized and standard administration of the Piers—Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vispoel, W. P. (1993). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary subtest. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vispoel, W. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An extension of the Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 134–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vispoel, W. P., Boo, J., & Bleiler, T. (1999). Computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A comparison of psychometric features and respondent preferences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Vispoel, W. P., & Coffman, D. (1994). Computerized adaptive and self-adapted music listening tests: Psychometric features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Vispoel, W. P., & Forte Fast, E. E. (2000). Response biases and their relation to sex differences in multiple domains of self-concept. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, L. E., & Marwell, G. (1976). Self-esteem: Its conceptualization and measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whitener, E. M., & Klein, H. J. (1994). Equivalence of computerized and traditional research methods: The roles of scanning, social environment, and social desirability. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, R. (1974). The self-concept: A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments (Rev. ed., Vol. 1). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, R. (1979). The self-concept: Theory and research on selected topics (Vol. 2). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar