146
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
METHODS, PLAINLY SPEAKING

The Importance of Reliability as It Relates to True Score Confidence Intervals

&
Pages 104-112 | Published online: 29 Aug 2019

REFERENCES

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Blixt, S. L., & Shama, D. D. (1986). An empirical investigation of the standard error of measurement at different ability levels. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 545–550.
  • Charter, R. A. (1997). Confidence interval procedures for retest, alternate-forms, validity, and alpha coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1488–1490.
  • Charter, R. A. (1999). Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 559–566.
  • Charter, R. A. (2001a). Damn the precision, full speed ahead with the clinical interpretation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 692–694.
  • Charter, R. A. (2001b). It is time to bury the Spearman—Brown “prophecy” formula for some common applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 690–696.
  • Charter, R. A., & Feldt, L. S. (2000). The relationship between two methods of evaluating an examinee's difference scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 125–142.
  • Charter, R. A., & Feldt, L. S. (2001a). Confidence intervals for true scores: Is there a correct approach? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 350–364.
  • Charter, R. A., & Feldt, L. S. (2001b). Meaning of reliability in terms of correct and incorrect clinical decisions: The art of decision making is still alive. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 530–537.
  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.
  • Dudek, F. J. (1979). The continuing misinterpretation of the standard error of measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 335–337.
  • Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In R. H. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Feldt, L. S., & Qualls, A. L. (1996). Estimation of measurement variance at specific score levels. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 141–156.
  • Feldt, L. S., Steffen, M., & Gupta, N. C. (1985). A comparison of five methods for estimating the standard error of measurement at specific score levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 351–361.
  • Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987). Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 93–103.
  • Gilmer, J. S., & Feldt, L. S. (1983). Reliability estimation for a test with parts of unknown lengths. Psychometrika, 48, 99–111.
  • Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., & Stanley, J. C. (1987). Resolving differences among methods of establishing confidence limits of test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 607–614.
  • Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
  • Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177–189.
  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Mollenkopf, W. G. (1949). Variation of the standard error of measurement. Psychometrika, 14, 189–229.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Segall, D. O. (1994). The reliability of linearly equated tests. Psychometrika, 59, 361–375.
  • Stanley, J. C. (1971). Reliability. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.). Washington DC: American Council on Education.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.