REFERENCES
- American Educational Research Association. (2000, July). AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in pre K—12 education. Retrieved July 3, 2002, from http://www.aera.net/about/policy/stakes.htm
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- American Psychological Association. (2001, May). Appropriate use of high-stakes testing in our nation's schools. Retrieved July 3, 2002, from http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/testing.html
- Cizek, G. J. (Ed.). (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Clarke, T. (2002, January 8). Graduation exit exams. National Governors Association Online. Retrieved February 1, 2002, from www.nga.org/center/divisions/1,1188,C_ISSUE_BRIEF^D_3007,00.html
- Elliott, J. L., Thurlow, M. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1996). Assessment guidelines that maximize the participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments: Characteristics and considerations (Synthesis Report No. 25). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved July 5, 2002, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis25.html
- Goertz, M., Duffy, M., & Carlson-Le Floch, K. (2001). State assessment and accountability systems: 50 state profiles. Retrieved September 15, 2001, from University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education Web site: http://www.cpre.org/Publications/Publications_Accountability.htm
- Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (1988). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Author.
- Koretz, D., McCaffrey D., Klein, S., Bell, R., & Stecher, B. (1993). The reliability of scores from the 1992 Vermont portfolio assessment program (CSE Technical Report 355). Los Angeles: RAND Institute on Education and Training/National Center for Research on Evaluation and Student Testing.
- Mehrens, W. A. (1993). Issues and recommendations regarding implementation of high school graduation tests. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
- Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 14–22.
- National Council on Measurement in Education. (1995). Code of professional responsibilities in educational measurement. Washington, DC: Author.
- No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 107 U. S. C. § 1425 (2002).
- Olson, J. F., Bond, L., & Andrews, C. (1999). Summary report of state student assessment programs. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
- Phillips, S. E. (1993). Legal implications of high-stakes assessment: What states should know. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
- Phillips, S. E. (1996). Legal defensibility of standards: Issues and perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15, 5–13, 19.
- Phillips, S. E. (Ed.). (2000). Defending a high school graduation test: GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency [Special issue]. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(4).
- Phillips, S. E. (2001). Legal issues in standard setting for K—12 programs. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 411–426). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Wise, L. L., DeMeyer Harris, C., Sipes, S. S., Hoffman, R. G., & Ford, J. P. (2000, June). High school exit examination (HSEE): Year 1 evaluation report. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
- Yen, W. M. (1997). The technical quality of performance assessments: Standard errors of percents of students reaching standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 5–15.