Testing Accommodations Research and Decision Making: The Case of “Good” Scores Being Highly Valued but Difficult to Achieve for All Students

REFERENCES

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson v. Banks, 530 F. Supp. 472, 510–11 (S.D. Ga. 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Board of Educ. of Northport v. Ambach, 436 N.Y.S. 2d 564 (1981); aff'd with mod 458 N.Y.S. 2d 680 (A.D. 1982), aff'd 457 N.E. 2d 775 (N.Y. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 534 F. Supp. 725 (C.D. Ill. 1982), rev'd 697 F.2d 179 (7th Cir. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• CTB/McGraw Hill. (1999). TerraNova multiple assessments reading battery—Research version. Monterey, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2000). Guidelines for using the results of standardized tests administered under nonstandard conditions. Monterey, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Debra P. v. Turlington, 474 F. Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979), modified and remanded, 644 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1981); 564 F. Supp. 177 (M.D. Fla. 1983), aff'd, 730 F. 2d 1405 (11th Cir. 1984).
   Google Scholar
• DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2000). The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Erickson, R. (1998). What about assessment and accountability? Practical implications for educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Braden, J. P., & White, J. (2001). Assessing one and all: Educational accountability for students with disabilities. Alexandria, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & McKevitt, B. C. (2001). Experimental analysis of the effects of testing accommodations on the scores of students with and without disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 39(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & Schulte, A. G. (1998). The assessment accommodations checklist: Who, what, where, when, why, and how? Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(2), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & Schulte, A. G. (1999). Assessment accommodations checklist. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, J. K., & Feldt, L. S. (1993). A comparison of achievement test performance of nondisabled students under silent reading and reading plus listening modes of administration. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii State Dept. of Educ., 17 EHLR 360, 361 (Oct. 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., & Almond, P. (1998). Teachers' knowledge of accommodations as a validity issue in high-stakes testing. Journal of Special Education, 32, 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U. S. C. & 1400 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Marquart, A. M. (2000). The use of extended time as an accommodation on a standardized mathematics test: An investigation of effects on scores and perceived consequences for students with various skill levels. University of Wisconsin, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (Eds.). (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKevitt, B. C., & Elliott, S. N. (in press). The effects and consequences of using testing accommodations on a standardized reading test. School Psychology Review.
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, L. L., Frisbie, D., & Deville, C. (2000, April). The effect of a reading accommodation on standardized test scores of learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. E. (1993). Testing condition accommodations for disabled students. West's Education Law Quarterly, 2, 366–389.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 93–120.
   Google Scholar
• Pitoniak, M. J., & Royer, J. M. (2001). Testing accommodations for examinees with disabilities: A review of psychometric, legal, and social policy issues. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 53–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973, C. F. R. 104 (Regulations).
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, A. G., Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2001). Experimental analysis of the effects of testing accommodations on students' standardized achievement test scores. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397, 406 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., House, A., Boys, C., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (2000). State participation and accommodation policies for students with disabilities: 1999 update. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, National Center of Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., Seyfarth, A. L., Scott, D. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1997). State assessment policies on participation and accommodations for students with disabilities: 1997 update (Synthesis Report 29). Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, National Center of Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Silverstein, B. (1995). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindal, G. (1998). Models for understanding task comparability in accommodated testing. Eugene, University of Oregon, Council of Chief State School Officers State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards Assessment Special Education Students (ASES) Study Group III.
   Google Scholar
• Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, C. F. R. 104 (Regulations).
   Google Scholar