Computing Robust, Bootstrap-Adjusted Fit Indices for Use With Nonnormal Data

References

• Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824.
   Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user's guide (Version 4). Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375–377.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 303–316.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256–259.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 205–229.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Mels, G. (1992). RAMONA users guide. Columbus: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Chen, F., Paxton, P., & Kirby, J. B. (2003). Finite sampling properties of the point estimates and confidence intervals of the RMSEA. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 208–252.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1992). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 132–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hammervold, R. (1998). Properties of goodness of fit statistics for structural equation models (Doctoral dissertation). Trondheim University, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221–233). Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. (1980). Tests of univariate and multivariate normality. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 1, pp. 279–320). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett's recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 851–858.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2000). Improving the root mean square error of approximation for nonnormal conditions in structural equation modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 353–377.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom, J. (2012). Practical approaches to dealing with nonnormal and categorical variables. Retrieved from http://www.upa.pdx.edu/IOA/newsom/semclass/ho_estimate2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557–595.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors on covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis (UCLA Statistic Series, No. 260). Retrieved from http://statistics.ucla.edu/preprints/uclastat-preprint-1999:19
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, June). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. A., & Smith, T. J. (2016). Computing robust, bootstrap-adjusted fit indices for use with non-normal data [Computer program]. DeKalb, IL: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1994). Estimation, inference, and specification analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar