Development and Evaluation of Assessments for Counseling Professionals

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
   Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I: Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, R. S. (2017). Evaluating evidence regarding relationships with criteria. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336928
   Google Scholar
• Bardhoshi, G., & Erford, B. T. (2017). Processes and procedures for estimating score reliability and precision. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1388680
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J., Bowen, D., & Church, K. (2010). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests: A follow-up study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410379323
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J., Koons, H. H., & Rosenberg, S. L. (2011). Finding validity evidence: An analysis using The Mental Measurements Sourcebook. In J. A. Bovaird, K. F. Geisinger & C. W. Buckendahl (Eds.), High stakes testing in education: Science and practice in K-12 settings (pp. 264–278). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S. L., & Koons, H. H. (2008). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407310130
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Desseilles, M., Perroud, N., Guillaume, S., Jaussent, I., Genty, C., Malafosse, A., & Courtet, P. (2012). Is it valid to measure suicidal ideation by depression rating scales? Journal of Affective Disorders, 136, 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.013
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, R. J., Sheperis, C. J., & Jones, K. D. (2016). Assessment procedures for counseling and helping professionals (8th ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, L. D., & Leech, N. L. (2003). The meaning of validity in the new Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing: Implications for measurement courses. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2003.11909741
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2014). The last of the 20th-century test standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(4), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12053
   Google Scholar
• Hays, D. G., & Wood, C. (2017). Stepping outside the normed sample: Implications for validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339565
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T. P, & Agnello, J. (2004). An empirical study of reporting practices regarding measurement validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 802–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404264120
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. P., O'Malley, K. J., Kallen, M. A., & Ford, M. E. (2005). Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings. Health Research and Educational Trust, 40, 1605–1619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00445.x
   Google Scholar
• Lambie, G. W., Blount, A. J., & Mullen, P. R. (2017). Establishing content-oriented evidence for psychological assessments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336930
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. (2014). Validity evidence based on testing consequences. Psicothema, 26, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.258
   Google Scholar
• Laswshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, A. S., Gómez Soler, I., Dell'Aquilla, J., & Uribe, P. M. (2017). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessments for use in counseling research. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1320947
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. F. (2017). Evidence regarding the internal structure: Confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929
   Google Scholar
• Markus, K. A. (2016). Alternative vocabularies in the test validity literature. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1060191
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2016). Disagreement over the best way to use the word “validity” and options for reaching consensus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1037241
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, J. L., & Benitez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema, 26, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.259
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. H., Peterson, N. A., & Powell, K. G. (2017). Cognitive interviewing for item development: Validity evidence based on content and response processes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256
   Google Scholar
• Spurgeon, S. L. (2017). Evaluating the unintended consequences of assessment practices: Construct irrelevance and construct underrepresentation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339563
   Google Scholar
• Swank, J. M., & Mullen, P. R. (2017). Evaluating evidence for conceptually related constructs using bivariate correlations. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339562
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. C. (2017). Establishing evidence for internal structure using exploratory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336931
   Google Scholar
• Wester, K. L., Borders, L. D., Boul, S., & Horton, E. (2013). Research quality: Critique of quantitative articles in the Journal of Counseling & Development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00096.x
   Google Scholar
• Willse, J. T. (2017). Polytomous Rasch models in counseling assessment. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1362656
   Google Scholar