Where Standpoint Stands Now: An Introduction and Commentary

References

• Allen, B. J. (1995, November). Twice blessed, doubly oppressed: Women of color in academe. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Bar On, B-A. (1993). Marginality and epistemic privilege. In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 83–100). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bullis, C. (1993). Organizational socialization research: Enabling, constraining, and shifting perspectives. Communication Monographs, 60, 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P.M. (1994). Gaining a voice: Feminist organizational communication theorizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 339–383.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (1994). The virtues of feminist empiricism. Hypatia, 9, 90–115.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of black feminist thought Social Problems, 33, 514–532.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1995). The social construction of black feminist thought. In N. Tuana & R. Tong (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy: Essential readings in theory, reinterpretation, and application (pp. 525–547). Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P.H. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “truth and method: feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Where’s the power? Signs, 22(2), 375–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980’s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–107.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “truth and method: feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Whose standpoint needs the regimes of truth and reality? Signs, 22(2), 382–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 283–310). Boston: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1985). Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1990a). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In L.J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 157–175). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1990b). Postmodernism and political change: Issues for feminist theory. Cultural Critique, 14, 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1997a). Standpoint theory for the next century. Women & Politics, 18(3), 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1997b). Comment on Hekman’s “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Truth or justice? Signs, 22(2), 367–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. (1997a). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 22(2), 341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. (1997b). Reply to Hartsock, Collins, Harding, and Smith. Signs, 22(2), 399–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschmann, N. J. (1997). Feminist standpoint as postmodern strategy. Women & Politics, 18(3), 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1990). Feminism: A transformational politic. In D.L. Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on sexual difference (pp. 185–193). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hundleby, C. (1997). Where standpoint stands now. Women & Politics, 18(3), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jaggar, A. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.
   Google Scholar
• Janack, M. (1997). Standpoint epistemology without the “standpoint”?: An examination of epistemic privilege and epistemic authority. Hypatia, 12(2), 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, S.J. (1997). Introduction. Women & Politics, 18(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Longine, H. E. Feminist standpoint theory and the problems of knowledge. Signs, 19(1), 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Makau, J. (1997). Embracing diversity in the classroom. In J. Makau & R. Arnett (Eds.), Communication ethics in an age of diversity (pp. 48–70). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malveaux, J. (1990). Gender and beyond: An economic perspective on diversity and commonality among women. In D.L. Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on sexual difference (pp. 227–238). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien Hallstein, D. L. (1997). Understanding the controversies associated with feminist standpoint theory: Exploring both its benefits and problems. Paper presented at Eighty-third National Communication Association Convention, November 19-23, 1997, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien Hallstein, D. L. (Winter, 1999). A postmodern caring: Feminist standpoint theories, revisioned caring and communication ethics. Western Journal of Communication, 63(1), 32–56.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, C. M. (1997). Counteridentification or counterhegemony? Transforming feminist standpoint theory. Women & Politics, 18(3), 45–72.
   Google Scholar
• Pointer, B. P. & Young, G. A. (1997). Derailing the equity process: Language as a mechanism of sabotage. In J. Makau & R. Arnett (Eds.), Communication ethics in an age of diversity (pp. 89–109). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (1983). Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs, 9, 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(2), 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D.E. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “truth and method: feminist standpoint theory revisited.” Signs, 22(2), 392–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanback, M. (1988). What makes scholarship about black women and communication feminist scholarship? Women’s Studies in Communication, 11, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. P. (1997). Facilitating connections: Issues of gender, culture, and diversity. In J. Makau & R. Arnett (Eds.), Communication ethics in an age of diversity (pp. 110–125). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welton, K. (1997). Nancy Hartsock’s standpoint theory: From content to “concrete multiplicity.” Women & Politics, 18(3), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, K. (1988, September). Women’s studies after two decades: Debates over politics, new directions for research. Chronicle of Higher Education, A4 & A7.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (1992). Gender and moral voice: Moving from women’s nature to standpoint epistemology. Women’s Studies in Communication, 15, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (1997). Diversity in dialogue: Commonalities and differences between friends. In J. Makau & R. Arnett (Eds.), Communication ethics in an age of diversity (pp. 5–26). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar