Where Women Scientists Belong: Placing Feminist Memory in Biography Collections for Children

References

• Allman, T. (2017). Women scientists and inventors. ReferencePoint Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Alpern, S., Perry, E. I., & Scobie, I. W. (1992). The challenge of feminist biography: Writing the lives of modern American women. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. (2004). How to make it as a woman: Collective biographical history from Victoria to the present. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford Edwards, S. (2017). Women in science. Essential Library.
   Google Scholar
• Brereton, C. (2018). Women scientists in math and coding. Gareth Stevens Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C. F. (2016). Texturing space, emplacing gender: Claudia Mendez’s “Constructing History, Constructing Identities.” Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(2), 147–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1176793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, K. T., & Manning, M. L. (1998). Telling our stories, sharing our lives: Collective biographies of women. The ALAN Review, 26(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.21061/alan.v26i1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. (2014). “MacGyver-Meets-Dr. Ruth”: Science journalism and the material positioning of Dr. Carla Pugh. Women’s Studies in Communication, 37(1), 44–65.
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2013). On the frontier of science: An American rhetoric of exploration and exploitation. Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. (2015). Women in science. PowerKids Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. (2013). Do gender-science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors? Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 541–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash, J. (1991). The triumph of discovery: Women scientists who won the Nobel Prize. Julian Messner.
   Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, K. (2012). Women scientists who changed the world. Rosen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, G., Blair, C., & Ott, B. L. (2010). Places of public memory the rhetoric of museums and memorials. University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickmann, N. (2018). Women scientists in astronomy and space. Gareth Stevens Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dubriwny, T. N., & Poirot, K. (2017). Gender and public memory. Southern Communication Journal, 82(4), 199–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Cozen, B., O’Byrne, M., Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., & Peterson, T. R. (2016). Putting the U in carbon capture and storage: Rhetorical boundary negotiation within the CCS/CCUS scientific community. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44(4), 362–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S. (2020). Why should this be so? The waxing and waning of children’s curiosity. In P. Zurn & A. Shankar (Eds.), Curiosity studies: A new ecology of knowledge (pp. 75–90). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, J. (2020). The feminist civics lesson of 19: The Musical. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 106(3), 242–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2020.1785632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, V. S. (1994). History of women in science for young people. VSE Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Etingoff, K. (2014). Women who built our scientific foundations. Mason Crest.
   Google Scholar
• Farzad-Phillips, A. (2020). Huddles or hurdles? Spatial barriers to collective gathering in the aftermath of the Women’s March. Women’s Studies in Communication, 43(3), 247–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2020.1747127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, L. A. (2019). At the intersections: Feminist border theory. Women’s Studies in Communication, 42(2), 113–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2019.1605127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne, T. (2016). Women in computer science. Core Library.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2018). Women in science. DK Children.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. (2000). Placiality: The renewal of the significance of place in modern cultural theory. Brno Studies in English 26, 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hoh, Y. K. (2009). Using biographies of outstanding women in bioengineering to dispel biology teachers’ misperceptions of engineers. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 458–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20565358
   Google Scholar
• Ignotofsky, R. (2016). Women in science: 50 fearless pioneers who changed the world. Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, J. (2013). “Exceptional women”: Epideictic rhetoric and women scientists. In A. George, M. E. Weiser, & J. Zepernick (Eds.), Woman and rhetoric between the wars (pp. 223–239). Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Campbell, K. K. (1982). Rhetorical hybrids: Fusions of generic elements. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68(2), 146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E., Parks, M. M., Mann, B. W., Maison, K., & Krall, M. A. (2019). Mapping Nature’s scientist: The posthumous demarcation of Rosalind Franklin’s crystallographic data. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(3), 297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1982). Feminism and science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7(3), 589–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/493901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. R., & Neville-Shepard, R. (2020). Virgin lands: Gender, nature, and the frontier myth in David Magnusson’s purity. Women’s Studies in Communication, 43(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFollette, M. C. (1988). Eyes on the stars: Images of women scientists in popular magazines. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 13(3-4), 262–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, L. (2017). Super women: Six scientists who changed the world. Holiday House.
   Google Scholar
• Mangor, J. (2016). Women in physical science. Core Library.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2016). Ceccarelli, Leah. On the frontier of science: An American rhetoric of exploration and exploitation. Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(1), 107–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, I. (1979). Contemporary women scientists of America. Julian Messner.
   Google Scholar
• Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
   Google Scholar
• Noyce, P. (2015). Magnificent minds: 16 pioneering women in science and medicine. Tumblehome Learning, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, A. (2018, October 7). Five women who missed out on the Nobel Prize. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/07/five-women-the-nobel-prize-missed
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. J. (2014). Girls research!: Amazing tales of female scientists. Capstone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, C. (2016). Democracy’s lot: Rhetoric, publics, and the places of invention. University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rushing, J. H. (1989). Evolution of “the new frontier” in Alien and Aliens: Patriarchal co‐optation of the feminine archetype. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 75(1), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638909383859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (1999). Gender and the politics of history. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shortland, M., & Yeo, R. (1996). Telling lives in science: Essays on scientific biography. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, L. H., and Gruber, J. (2020, October 16). Three trouble spots facing women in science–and how we can tackle them. Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2020/10/three-trouble-spots-facing-women-science-and-how-we-can-tackle-them
   Google Scholar
• Sowards, S. K. (2019). Bordering through place/s, difference/s, and language/s: Intersections of border and feminist theories. Women’s Studies in Communication, 42(2), 120–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2019.1605131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabell, I. L. (2013). Model patriots: The first children’s biographies of George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. Children’s Literature, 41(1), 91–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/chl.2013.0016
   Google Scholar
• Stille, D. R. (1995). Extraordinary women scientists. Childrens Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swaby, R. (2017). Trailblazers: 33 women in science who changed the world. Yearling.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (1991). Defining the scientific community: A rhetorical perspective on demarcation. Communications Monographs, 58(4), 402–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759109376238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thimmesh, C. (2002). The sky’s the limit: Stories of discovery by women and girls. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• VanderHaagen, S. C. (2012). Practical truths: Black feminist agency and public memory in biographies for children. Women’s Studies in Communication, 35(1), 18–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2012.668101
   Google Scholar
• VanderHaagen, S. C. (2018). Children’s biographies of African American women: Rhetoric, public memory, and agency. University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vicinus, M. (1996). “Tactful organising and executive power”: Biographies of Florence Nightingale for girls. In M. Shortland & R. Yeo (Eds.), Telling lives in science: Essays on scientific biography (pp. 195–213). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werderich, D. E. (2014). Putting a face to science: Using biographies as mentor texts to teach science and literacy. The Ohio Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, E. (1943). American women of science. Frederick A. Stokes Company.
   Google Scholar
• Yount, L. (1995). Twentieth-century women scientists. Facts on File.
   Google Scholar