Reproductive outcomes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology who are carriers of chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study

References

• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive T & World Health O, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009b;92(5):1520–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus AR, Silva-Soares S, Silva J, et al. Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(7):1471–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Zheng D, Wu H, et al. Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population-based study. BJOG 2018;125(4):432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden DE, Friedman JM. Chromosome abnormalities in human beings. Mutat Res. 1997;396(1–2):129–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah K, Sivapalan G, Gibbons N, et al. The genetic basis of infertility. Reproduction 2003;126(1):13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim ME, Karakus S, Kurtulgan HK, et al. The type and prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent first trimester abortions: a Turkish retrospective study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(7):521–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fesahat F, Montazeri F, Hoseini SM. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction technology. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(5):101723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;36(6):677–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maithripala S, Durland U, Havelock J, et al. Prevalence and treatment choices for couples with recurrent pregnancy loss due to structural chromosomal anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(6):655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, et al. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ 2006;332(7544):759–763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin DK, Ogur C. Chromosomal analysis in IVF: just how useful is it? Reproduction 2018;156(1):F29–F50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan-Jordan J, Ont O, Simons A, International Standing Committee on Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature, et al. ISCN: an International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature. Basel: Karger; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive T & World Health O, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009a;24(11):2683–2687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Yan J, Xu F, et al. Genome sequencing explores complexity of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent miscarriage. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(6):1102–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li D, Ni X, et al. Effects of the normal sperm morphology rate on the clinical and neonatal outcomes of conventional IVF cycles. Andrologia 2020;52(5):e13568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preimplantation genetic testing: ACOG committee opinion, number 799. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e133–e137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiegs AW, Hodes-Wertz B, McCulloh DH, et al. Discrepant diagnosis rate of array comparative genomic hybridization in thawed euploid blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(7):893–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2089–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockeel C, Schutyser V, De Vos A, et al. Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17(6):848–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J, Boulet SL, Jeng G, et al. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States assisted reproductive technology surveillance data, 2011–2012. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang HJ, Melnick AP, Stewart JD, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):597–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verpoest W, Staessen C, Bossuyt PM, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1767–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann K, Sermon K, Bossuyt P, et al. An economic analysis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by polar body biopsy in advanced maternal age. BJOG 2020;127(6):710–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar