Advanced search
Publication Cover
Annals of Medicine Volume 54, 2022 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,043
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Neurology

A new prediction model for giant cell arteritis in patients with new onset headache and/or visual loss

Walid Moudrousa Department of Neurology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;b Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-9876
ORCID Icon,
Leo H. Visserc Department of Neurology of the ETZ, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
,
Tansel Yilmaza Department of Neurology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
,
Marjan H. Wieringad Department of Education and Research, ETZ, Tilburg, the Netherlands
,
Tim Allemane Department of Neurology, St. Jans Gasthuis Hospital, Weert, the Netherlands
,
Jörgen Roversf Department of Neurology, the Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
,
Mark P.W.A. Houbeng Department of Neurology, the Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
,
Paula M. Janssenb Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;g Department of Neurology, the Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
,
Johan J. B. Janssenh Department of Internal Medicine, the Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
,
Pieter L. Rensmai Department of Internal Medicine of the ETZ, location St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
&
Geert J. F. Brekelmansc Department of Neurology of the ETZ, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
 show all
Pages 2769-2775 | Received 16 Nov 2021, Accepted 27 Sep 2022, Published online: 21 Oct 2022

References

  • McAlinden C, Ioannidis P, Roberts S, et al. Giant cell arteritis. Lancet. 2014;383(9923):1182. 1182-6736(14)60459-1.
  • Brack A, Martinez‐Taboada V, Stanson A, et al. Disease pattern in cranial and large‐vessel giant cell arteritis. Arthr Rheumat. 1999;42(2):311–317.
  • Gonzalez‐Gay MA, Vazquez‐Rodriguez TR, Lopez‐Diaz MJ, et al. Epidemiology of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(10):1454–1461.
  • Gonzalez-Gay MA, Martinez-Dubois C, Agudo M, et al. Giant cell arteritis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010;12(6):436–442.
  • Gonzalez-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C, Llorca J, et al. Biopsy-negative giant cell arteritis: clinical spectrum and predictive factors for positive temporal artery biopsy. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2001;30(4):249–256.
  • Salvarani C, Pipitone N, Versari A, et al. Clinical features of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(9):509–521.
  • González‐Gay MA, Blanco R, Rodríguez‐Valverde V, et al. Permanent visual loss and cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis: predictors and response to treatment. Arthr Rheum. 1998;41(8):1497–1504.
  • Breuer GS, Nesher R, Nesher G. Negative temporal artery biopsies: eventual diagnoses and features of patients with biopsy-negative giant cell arteritis compared to patients without arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26(6):1103–1106.
  • Luqmani R, Lee E, Singh S, et al. The role of ultrasound compared to biopsy of temporal arteries in the diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(90):1–238.
  • Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, et al. The American college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(8):1122–1128.
  • Rao JK, Allen NB, Pincus T. Limitations of the 1990 American college of rheumatology classification criteria in the diagnosis of vasculitis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(5):345–352.
  • Buttgereit F, Dejaco C, Matteson EL, et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic review. J A M A. 2016;315(22):2442–2458.
  • Kermani TA, Schmidt J, Crowson CS, et al. Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Semin Arthrit Rheumat. 2012;41(6):866–871.
  • Biousse V, Newman NJ. Ischemic optic neuropathies. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2428–2436.
  • Miller A, Green M, Robinson D. Simple rule for calculating normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;286(6361):266.
  • Schmidt WA. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(suppl_2):ii22–ii31.
  • Lie JT. Temporal artery biopsy diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: lessons from 1109 biopsies. Anat Pathol. 1996;1:69–97.
  • Aschwanden M, Daikeler T, Kesten F, et al. Temporal artery compression sign–a novel ultrasound finding for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:47–50.
  • Coath FL, Chetan Mukhtyar C. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and follow-up of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(6):2528–2536.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.