1,395
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Medical Education

Virtual residency recruitment: future directions in the new era

, , ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 3341-3347 | Received 06 Jul 2022, Accepted 12 Nov 2022, Published online: 21 Nov 2022

References

  • Zastrow RK, Burk-Rafel J, London DA. Systems-level reforms to the US resident selection process: a scoping review. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(3):355–370.
  • Final Report and Recommendations for Medical Education Institutions of LCME-Accredited, U.S. Osteopathic, and Non-U.S. Medical School Applicants. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. https://physicianaccountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Workgroup-C-2020.05.06-Final-Recommendations_Final.pdf.
  • 2021. Applicant and Program Director Survey Findings: Impact of the Virtual Experience on the Transition to Residency Research Brief. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Research-Brief-Virtual-Experience-2021-FINAL.pdf
  • National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: 2021 Main Residency Match®. Washington, DC, USA: National Residency Match Program; 2021.
  • National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: 2022 Main Residency Match®. Washington, DC, USA: National Residency Match Program; 2022.
  • Recommendations on 2021-22 Residency Season Interviewing for Medical Education Institutions Considering Applicants from LCME-Accredited, U.S. Osteopathic, and Non-U.S. Medical Schools. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. https://physicianaccountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Virtual-Rec_COVID-Only_Final.pdf
  • AAMC Interview Guidance for the 2022–2023 Residency Cycle. Association of American Medical Colleges. [cited 2022 Jun 2]. https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/medical-education/aamc-interview-guidance-2022-2023-residency-cycle
  • Heitkamp NM, Morgan LE. Virtual social events: an integral component of recruitment in the new era of graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(6):761–763.
  • Palmer B. Graduate medical education virtual recruitment offers opportunity to innovate using social media. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(1):136–137.
  • Shah NL, Miller JB, Bilal M, et al. Smartphone apps in graduate medical education virtual recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Syst. 2021;45(3):36.
  • Brueggeman DA, Via GG, Froehle AW, et al. Virtual interviews in the era of COVID-19: expectations and perceptions of orthopaedic surgery residency candidates and program directors. JB JS Open Access. 2021;6(3):e21.00034.
  • Romano R, Mukherjee D, Michael LM, et al. Optimizing the residency application process: insights from neurological surgery during the pandemic virtual application cycle. J Neurosurg. 2022;137:1–9.
  • Spencer E, Ambinder D, Christiano C, et al. Finding the next resident physicians in the COVID-19 global pandemic: an applicant survey on the 2020 virtual urology residency match. Urology. 2021;157:44–50.
  • Bamba R, Bhagat N, Tran PC, et al. Virtual interviews for the independent plastic surgery match: a modern convenience or a modern misrepresentation? J Surg Educ. 2021;78(2):612–621.
  • Sarac BA, Shen AH, Nassar AH, et al. Virtual interviews for the integrated plastic surgery residency match: the program director perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(7):e3707.
  • Om A, Losken A. Effect of COVID-19 on geographic distribution of the integrated plastic surgery match. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(6):e3676.
  • Abdelwahab R, Antezana LA, Xie KZ, et al. Cross-sectional study of dermatology residency home match incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;87:886–888. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921983
  • Breitkopf DM, Green IC, Hopkins MR, et al. Use of asynchronous video interviews for selecting obstetrics and gynecology residents. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(Suppl 1):9S–15S.
  • Cohen SA, Pershing S. Geographic trends in the ophthalmology residency match: influence of program and applicant characteristics. J Acad Ophthalmol. 2022;14(01):e81–e92.
  • Strumpf Z, Miller C, Livingston D, et al. Virtual interviews: challenges and opportunities for pulmonary disease and critical care medicine fellowship programs. ATS Sch. 2021;2(4):535–543.
  • Millo L, Ho N, Ubel PA. The cost of applying to medical school - a barrier to diversifying the profession. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1505–1508.
  • Camp CL, Sousa PL, Hanssen AD, et al. The cost of getting into orthopedic residency: analysis of applicant demographics, expenditures, and the value of away rotations. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(5):886–891.
  • Gordon AM, Malik AT, Scharschmidt TJ, et al. Cost analysis of medical students applying to orthopaedic surgery residency: implications for the 2020 to 2021 application cycle during COVID-19. JB JS Open Access. 2021;6(1):e20.00158.
  • Donahue LM, Morgan HK, Peterson WJ, et al. The carbon footprint of residency interview travel. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(1):89–94.
  • Liang KE, Dawson JQ, Stoian MD, et al. A carbon footprint study of the Canadian medical residency interview tour. Med Teach. 2021;43(11):1302–1308.
  • Gallo K, Becker R, Borin J, et al. Virtual residency interviews reduce cost and carbon emissions. J Urol. 2021;206(6):1353–1355.
  • Ding JJ, Has P, Hampton BS, et al. Obstetrics and gynecology resident perception of virtual fellowship interviews. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):58.
  • Jones HM, Ankem A, Seroogy EA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on radiology residency selection process: a survey of radiology residency programs in the US. Acad Radiol. 2022;29:779–785. PMC8743012.
  • LeDuc R, Lyons MM, Riopelle D, et al. Social media utilization trends in orthopaedic surgery residency programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):13–17.
  • Walk CT, Gerardo R, Parikh PP. Increasing social media presence for graduate medical education programs. Am Surg. 2021;31348211031848.
  • Pope AJ, Carter K, Ahn J. A renewed call for a more equitable and holistic review of residency applications in the era of COVID-19. AEM Educ Train. 2021;5(1):135–138.
  • Grimm LJ, Avery CS, Maxfield CM. Residency postinterview communications: more harm than good? J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(1):7–9.
  • Blacksmith N, Willford J, Behrend T. Technology in the employment interview: a meta-analysis and future research agenda. PAD. 2016;2(1):12–20.
  • Basch JM, Melchers KG, Kurz A, et al. It takes more than a good camera: which factors contribute to differences between face-to-Face interviews and VideoconferenceInterviews regarding performance ratingsand interviewee perceptions? J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(5):921–940.
  • Potočnik K, Anderson NR, Born M, et al. Paving the way for research in recruitment and selection: recent developments, challenges and future opportunities. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2021;30(2):159–174.
  • Dierkens N. Information asymmetry and equity issues. J Financ Quan Anal. 1991;26(2):181–199.