1,431
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users

, , , , &
Pages 447-455 | Received 30 Jun 2022, Accepted 05 Jan 2023, Published online: 16 Jan 2023

References

  • Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–429.
  • Cuccurullo S. Physical medicine and rehabilitation board review. 3rd ed. New York: Demos Medical; 2014. ISBN 9781620700396.
  • Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Incidence, acute care length of stay, and discharge to rehabilitation of traumatic amputee patients: an epidemiologic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(3):279–287.
  • Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875–883.
  • Varma P, Stineman MG, Dillingham TR. Epidemiology of limb loss. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(1):1–8.
  • Krajbich J, Pinzur M, Potter B, et al. Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies. 4th ed. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2016.
  • Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):247–262.
  • Teng Z, Xu G, Liang R, et al. Design of an underactuated prosthetic hand with flexible Multi-Joint fingers and EEG-Based control. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS); October 2018; Shenzhen: IEEE; 2018. p. 647–651.
  • Kasim MAA, Low CY, Ayub MA, et al. User-friendly LabVIEW GUI for prosthetic hand control using emotiv EEG headset. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;105:276–281.
  • Ngan CGY, Kapsa RMI, Choong PFM. Strategies for neural control of prosthetic limbs: from electrode interfacing to 3D printing. Materials. 2019;12(12):1927.
  • Resnik LJ, Borgia ML, Acluche F, et al. How do the outcomes of the DEKA arm compare to conventional prostheses? PLOS One. 2018;13(1):e0191326.
  • Smail LC, Neal C, Wilkins C, et al. Comfort and function remain key factors in upper limb prosthetic abandonment: findings of a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(8):821–830.
  • Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(2):172–177.
  • Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(6):346–357.
  • Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-Limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(12):977–987.
  • Tennent DJ, Wenke JC, Rivera JC, et al. Characterisation and outcomes of upper extremity amputations. Injury. 2014;45(6):965–969.
  • Luchetti M, Cutti AG, Verni G, et al. Impact of michelangelo prosthetic hand: findings from a crossover longitudinal study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(5):605–618.
  • McFarland L, V; Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, et al. Unilateral Upper-Limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):299–316.
  • Franzke AW, Kristoffersen MB, Bongers RM, et al. Users’ and therapists’ perceptions of myoelectric multi-function upper limb prostheses with conventional and pattern recognition control. PLOS One. 2019;14(8):e0220899.
  • Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, et al. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–534.
  • Carlyle L. Artificial arm checkout procedures. Artif Limbs. 1954;13:25–29.
  • Feys P, Lamers I, Francis G, et al. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017;23(5):711–720.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3–13.
  • ten Kate J, Smit G, Breedveld P. 3D-Printed upper limb prostheses: a review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(3):300–314.
  • Pentek A, Nyitrai M, Schiffer A, et al. The effect of printing parameters on electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of PLA and ABS based carbon composites in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics. Crystals. 2020;10(5):398.
  • Latour D. Advances in upper extremity prosthetic technology: rehabilitation and the interprofessional team. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2022;10(2):71–76.
  • Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K. The DEKA arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the veterans affairs study to optimize the DEKA arm. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(6):492–504.
  • Igual C, Pardo LA, Hahne J, et al. Myoelectric control for upper limb prostheses. Electronics. 2019;8(11):1244.
  • Hargrove LJ, Scheme EJ, Englehart KB, et al. Multiple binary classifications via linear discriminant analysis for improved controllability of a powered prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18(1):49–57.
  • Gonzalez J, Soma H, Sekine M, et al. Psycho-Physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:33.
  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994;14(5 Pt 2):3208–3224.
  • Metzger AJ, Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, et al. Feedforward control strategies of subjects with transradial amputation in planar reaching. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(3):201–211.
  • Engdahl SM, Gates DH. Differences in quality of movements made with Body-Powered and myoelectric prostheses during activities of daily living. Clin Biomech. 2021;84:105311.
  • Østlie K, Lesjø IM, Franklin RJ, et al. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major Upper-Limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(6):479–493.