797
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Anesthesiology

Does the periportal end of a double-lumen endobronchial tube need to be fixed to prevent dislocation of the cuffed end caused by a change in position? A randomized controlled trial

, , , , , , & show all
Article: 2247422 | Received 23 May 2023, Accepted 08 Aug 2023, Published online: 24 Aug 2023

References

  • Mourisse J, Liesveld J, Verhagen A, et al. Efficiency, efficacy, and safety of EZ-blocker compared with left-sided double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(3):1–10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182834f2d.
  • Kim SH, Choi YS, Shin S, et al. Positioning of double-lumen tubes based on the minimum peak inspiratory pressure difference between the right and left lungs in short patients: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31(3):137–142. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328364c3a7.
  • Belze O, Lepage E, Bazin Y, et al. Glidescope versus airtraq DL for double-lumen tracheal tube insertion in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway: a randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(7):456–463. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000655.
  • Desiderio DP, Burt M, Kolker AC, et al. The effects of endobronchial cuff inflation on double-lumen endobronchial tube movement after lateral decubitus positioning. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11(5):595–598. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90011-2.
  • Kako H, Krishna SG, Ramesh AS, et al. The relationship between head and neck position and endotracheal tube intracuff pressure in the pediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(3):316–321. doi: 10.1111/pan.12308.
  • Hartrey R, Kestin IG. Movement of oral and nasal tracheal tubes as a result of changes in head and neck position. Anaesthesia. 1995;50(8):682–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06093.x.
  • Maruyama D, Chaki T, Omote M, et al. Movements of the double-lumen endotracheal tube due to lateral position with head rotation and tube fixation: a thiel-embalmed cadaver study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(7):841–844. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1411-6.
  • Slinger PD. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic positioning of double-lumen tube. Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989;3(4):486–496. doi: 10.1016/S0888-6296(89)97987-8.
  • Ruetzler K, Fleck M, Nabecker S, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of licorice versus sugar-water gargle for prevention of postoperative sore throat and postextubation coughing. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(3):614–621. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318299a650.
  • Klein U, Karzai W, Bloos F, et al. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in conjunction with the use of double-lumen tubes for thoracic anesthesia: a prospective study. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(2):346–350. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00012.
  • Karabiyik L, Altinay E, Bedirli N. Placement of a double lumen tube in a patient with difficult intubation due to ankylosing spondylitis-a case report. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2011;21:135–138.
  • Askins V, Eismont FJ. Efficacy of five cervical or thoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparsion study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(11):1193–1198. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199706010-00004.
  • Sarig-Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(10):1018–1024. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b3254.
  • Benumof JL, Partridge BL, Salvatierra C, et al. Margin of safety in positioning modern double-lumen endotracheal tubes. Anesthesiology. 1987;67(5):729–738. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198711000-00018.
  • Hamaya Y, Dohi S. Differences in cardiovascular response to airway stimulation at different sites and blockade of the responses by lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(1):95–103. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00018.