Comparison of a single session of tDCS on cerebellum vs. motor cortex in stroke patients: a randomized sham-controlled trial

References

• GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245–255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36(9):e100–e143. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29–e322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldema J, Jansen P. Resistance training in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(9):1173–1197. doi: 10.1177/0269215520932964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldema J, Jansen P. Ergometer training in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(4):674–689. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks HT, Van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1629–1637. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1677–1684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solanki D, Rezaee Z, Dutta A, et al. Investigating the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke overground gait performance: a partial least-squares regression approach. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2020;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00817-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(5):e259–e281. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Patil CG. Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke. World Neurosurg. 2011;76(6 Suppl.):S85–S90. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaida C, Birlescu I, Pisla A, et al. Systematic design of a parallel robotic system for lower limb rehabilitation. IEEE Access. 2020;8:34522–34537. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, St George B, Fenton M, et al. Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(3):209. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70029-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–360. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming MK, Pavlou M, Newham DJ, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for the lower limb after stroke: What do we know so far and what should we be doing next? Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(7):714–720. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1161835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klomjai W, Lackmy-Vallée A, Roche N, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: an update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58(4):220–224. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz PG, Salazar APdS, Stein C, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with other therapies improves gait speed after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26(3):201–213. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1565696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubis N. Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance post-stroke recovery. Front Neural Circuits. 2016;10:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew S-L, Santarnecchi E, Buch ER, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: local and distant effects for motor recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008;1(3):206–223. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527(Pt 3):633–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011;17(1):37–53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaug G, Renga V. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(6):759–768. doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.6.759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordacre B, Moezzi B, Ridding MC. Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(8):3326–3339. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation: a promising approach for stroke recovery? Cerebellum. 2018;17(3):359–371. doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0906-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandvliet SB, Meskers CG, Kwakkel G, et al. Short-term effects of cerebellar tDCS on standing balance performance in patients with chronic stroke and healthy age-matched elderly. Cerebellum. 2018;17(5):575–589. doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0939-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch G, Bonnì S, Casula EP, et al. Effect of cerebellar stimulation on gait and balance recovery in patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(2):170–178. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro RA, Midgley A, Massaferri R, et al. Bihemispheric motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation improves force steadiness in post-stroke hemiparetic patients: a randomized crossover controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DM, Fridriksson J, Stewart JC, et al. Cortical disconnection of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex is associated with gait speed and upper extremity motor impairment in chronic left hemispheric stroke. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(1):120–132. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang MC, Kim DY, Park DH. Enhancement of cortical excitability and lower limb motor function in patients with stroke by transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(3):561–566. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahtis V, Kaski D, Seemungal BM. The effect of single session bi-cephalic transcranial direct current stimulation on gait performance in sub-acute stroke: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(4):527–532. doi: 10.3233/RNN-140393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-López V, Molina-Rueda F, Jiménez-Jiménez S, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physiotherapy on gait pattern, balance, and functionality in stroke patients. A systematic review. Diagnostics. 2021;11(4):656. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldema J, Gharabaghi A. Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spampinato D, Celnik P. Multiple motor learning processes in humans: defining their neurophysiological bases. Neuroscientist. 2021;27(3):246–267. doi: 10.1177/1073858420939552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampersad SM, Janssen AM, Lucka F, et al. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(3):441–452. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2308997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picelli A, Zuccher P, Tomelleri G, et al. Prognostic importance of lesion location on functional outcome in patients with cerebellar ischemic stroke: a prospective pilot study. Cerebellum. 2017;16(1):257–261. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0757-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram G, Tang B, Pallegadda R, et al. Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(11):2950–2957. doi: 10.1152/jn.00645.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado AG, Cooperrider J, Furmaga HT, et al. Chronic 30-Hz deep cerebellar stimulation coupled with training enhances post-ischemia motor recovery and peri-infarct synaptophysin expression in rodents. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(2):344–353; discussion 353. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000430766.80102.ac.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H-J, Furmaga H, Cooperrider J, et al. Modulation of cortical motor evoked potential after stroke during electrical stimulation of the lateral cerebellar nucleus. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(6):1043–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft AR, Forrester L, Macko RF, et al. Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage. 2005;26(1):184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celnik P. Understanding and modulating motor learning with cerebellar stimulation. Cerebellum. 2015;14(2):171–174. doi: 10.1007/s12311-014-0607-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, et al. Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(8):1761–1770. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram G, Galea JM, Bastian AJ, et al. Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(8):1901–1909. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block HJ, Celnik P. Can cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation become a valuable neurorehabilitation intervention? Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12(11):1275–1277. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra BW, Bekkers EM, Gilat M, et al. Functional neuroimaging of human postural control: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;115:351–362. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surgent OJ, Dadalko OI, Pickett KA, et al. Balance and the brain: a review of structural brain correlates of postural balance and balance training in humans. Gait Posture. 2019;71:245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntakou EA, Nasios G, Nousia A, et al. Targeting cerebellum with non-invasive transcranial magnetic or current stimulation after cerebral hemispheric stroke – insights for corticocerebellar network reorganization: a comprehensive review. Healthcare. 2022;10(12):2401. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qurat-Ul-Ain  , Ahmad Z, Ishtiaq S, et al. Short term effects of anodal cerebellar vs. anodal cerebral transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke patients, a randomized control trial. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1035558. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1035558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehsani F, Bakhtiary A, Jaberzadeh S, et al. Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study. Neurosci Res. 2016;112:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2016.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharlouei H, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Mehravar M, et al. Comparison of transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex and cerebellum on static balance in older adults. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2020;22(3):e96259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner KM, Enders A, Thier W, et al. Cerebellar tDCS does not improve learning in a complex whole body dynamic balance task in young healthy subjects. PLOS One. 2016;11(9):e0163598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts ACH, de Haart M, van Nes IJW, et al. A review of standing balance recovery from stroke. Gait Posture. 2005;22(3):267–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al. G* power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(2):1031–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agboada D, Mosayebi Samani M, Jamil A, et al. Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54621-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agboada D, Mosayebi-Samani M, Kuo M-F, et al. Induction of long-term potentiation-like plasticity in the primary motor cortex with repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation – better effects with intensified protocols? Brain Stimul. 2020;13(4):987–997. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garin P, Gilain C, Van Damme J-P, et al. Short- and long-lasting tinnitus relief induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurol. 2011;258(11):1940–1948. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6037-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojardias E, Azé OD, Luneau D, et al. The effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the walking performance of chronic hemiplegic patients. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(3):373–379. doi: 10.1111/ner.12962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre S, Thonnard J-L, Laloux P, et al. Single session of dual-tDCS transiently improves precision grip and dexterity of the paretic hand after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(2):100–110. doi: 10.1177/1545968313478485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka S, Takeda K, Otaka Y, et al. Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(6):565–569. doi: 10.1177/1545968311402091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14(8):1133–1145. doi: 10.1017/S1461145710001690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaei A, Ehsani F, Zoghi M, et al. Online and offline effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy older adults: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;45(9):1177–1185. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig CE, Doumas M. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation shows minimal, measure-specific effects on dynamic postural control in young and older adults: a double blind, sham-controlled study. PLOS One. 2017;12(1):e0170331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yosephi MH, Ehsani F, Zoghi M, et al. Multi-session anodal tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and postural stability in older adults with high fall risk: primary motor cortex versus cerebellar stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(6):1239–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.07.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuchowski ML, Timmann D, Gerwig M. Acquisition of conditioned eyeblink responses is modulated by cerebellar tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(4):525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, et al. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(11):2220–2223. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(4):845–850. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintado-Izquierdo S, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Ortiz-Gutiérrez RM. Video game-based therapy on balance and gait of patients with stroke: a systematic review. Appl Sci. 2020;10(18):6426. doi: 10.3390/app10186426.
   Google Scholar
• Akhir A, Mustapa A, Manaf H. Effectiveness of exergames on balance and gait performance among post-stroke patients: a systematic review. Malay J Med Health Sci. 2022;18(8):355–364.
   Google Scholar
• Park D-S, Lee D-G, Lee K, et al. Effects of virtual reality training using Xbox Kinect on motor function in stroke survivors: a preliminary study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(10):2313–2319. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shobhana NG, Rakholiya S. The effect of Xbox 360 Kinect-virtual reality intervention on balance and gait training in stroke patient: an interventional study. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2020;11:589–594.
   Google Scholar
• Bin Song G, Cho Park E. Effect of virtual reality games on stroke patients’ balance, gait, depression, and interpersonal relationships. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(7):2057–2060. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559–566. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghadir AH, Al-Eisa ES, Anwer S, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1146-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Rensink M, Schuurmans M. Clinimetric properties of the Timed Up and Go Test for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(3):197–210. doi: 10.1310/tsr2103-197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The Timed Up & Go Test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1641–1647. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinsongkram B, Chaikeeree N, Saengsirisuwan V, et al. Responsiveness of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2016;96(10):1638–1647. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinsongkram B, Chaikeeree N, Saengsirisuwan V, et al. Reliability and validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2014;94(11):1632–1643. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin IE, Guclu-Gunduz A, Yazici G, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test-BESTest in determining risk of fall in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(1):67–77. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009;89(5):484–498. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn TJ, Elliott E, Langhorne P. Cognitive and mood assessment tools for use in stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(2):483–490. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiti G, Pantoni L. Use of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(10):3135–3140. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaw J, Subramaniam P, Abd Aziz NA, et al. Current update on the clinical utility of MMSE and MoCA for stroke patients in Asia: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):8962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner JM. Neurology falls. Patient falls risk assessment, neurology clinic. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins Hospital; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hnizdo S, Archuleta RA, Taylor B, et al. Validity and reliability of the modified John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for elderly patients in home health care. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34(5):423–427. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Horton MG, Wikholm JB. Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14(3):246–250. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199109000-00010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motl RW, Cohen JA, Benedict R, et al. Validity of the timed 25-foot walk as an ambulatory performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017;23(5):704–710. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn A, Marsden DL, Nugent E, et al. Protocol variations and Six-Minute Walk Test performance in stroke survivors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Stroke Res Treat. 2015;2015:484813–484828. doi: 10.1155/2015/484813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler SK, Turkeltaub PE, Benson JG, et al. Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(2):155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akadas S, Kshirasagar P, Wadhokar G. Understanding approaches to balance assessment in physical therapy practice with various available and valid scales. Int J Physiother Res. 2018;6(2):2682–2688. doi: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.112.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonraad N. Outcome measures validated for use in stroke rehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 3):490–499. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines BW, Nair D, Schlaug G. Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28(8):1667–1673. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06459.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi R, Mahmoudi Z, Mahmoodian N, et al. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on Timed Up and Go Test with foot placement in chronic stroke patients. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2021;8(1):106180. doi: 10.5812/mejrh.106180.
   Google Scholar
• MacLullich AMJ, Edmond CL, Ferguson KJ, et al. Size of the neocerebellar vermis is associated with cognition in healthy elderly men. Brain Cogn. 2004;56(3):344–348. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CR, Kim D-Y, Kim LS, et al. Modulation of cortical activity after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the lower limb motor cortex: a functional MRI study. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(4):462–467. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche N, Lackmy A, Achache V, et al. Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 23):5653–5664. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.177550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaski D, Quadir S, Patel M, et al. Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the “broken escalator” phenomenon using anodal tDCS. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(9):2493–2505. doi: 10.1152/jn.00223.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul R, Grieve SM, Chaudary B, et al. Relative contributions of the cerebellar vermis and prefrontal lobe volumes on cognitive function across the adult lifespan. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(3):457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.07.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson AK, de Albuquerque LL, Pantovic M, et al. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in a complex overhand throwing task. Cerebellum. 2019;18(4):813–816. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01040-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klomjai W, Aneksan B, Pheungphrarattanatrai A, et al. Effect of single-session dual-tDCS before physical therapy on lower-limb performance in sub-acute stroke patients: a randomized sham-controlled crossover study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(5):286–291. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utarapichat S, Kitisomprayoonkul W. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor activity of lower limb muscles in chronic stroke. J Med Assoc Thai. 2018;101:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kindred JH, Kautz SA, Wonsetler EC, et al. Single sessions of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation do not alter lower extremity biomechanical or corticomotor response variables post-stroke. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:286. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner KM, Thier W, Batsikadze G, et al. Lack of effects of a single session of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a dynamic balance task. J Neurol. 2020;267(4):1206–1208. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09712-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draaisma LR, Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance cognitive rehabilitation after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2020;719:133678. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.06.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agata F, Peila E, Cicerale A, et al. Cognitive and neurophysiological effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in stroke patients after motor rehabilitation. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrucci R, Priori A. Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation (tcDCS): motor control, cognition, learning and emotions. Neuroimage. 2014;85(Pt 3):918–923. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul. 2015;8(3):535–550. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HS, Park YJ, Park SW. The effects of virtual reality training on function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7595639. doi: 10.1155/2019/7595639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh A, McCabe J, Skelly M, et al. Stance phase gait training post stroke using simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation and motor learning-based virtual reality-assisted therapy: protocol development and initial testing. Brain Sci. 2022;12(6):701. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar