Comparison of binocular visual quality in six treatment protocols for bilateral cataract surgery with presbyopia correction: a prospective two-center single-blinded cohort study

References

• Assi L, Chamseddine F, Ibrahim P, et al. A global assessment of eye health and quality of life. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(5):1–11. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World population prospects: the 2022 revision. UN; 2022. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz JD, Bourne RRA, Briant PS, et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to sight: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(2):e144–e160. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30489-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, et al. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization WH. World report on vision. [cited 2019 Oct 9]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/328717/9789241516570-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne R, Steinmetz JD, Flaxman S, et al. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(2):e130–e143. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30425-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Wang B, Liu H, et al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(12):e682–e691. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30254-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Ellwein LB, Guo X, et al. Progression of near vision loss and incidence of near vision impairment in an adult Chinese population. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(5):734–742. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TI, Alio Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, et al. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019;393(10185):2085–2098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33209-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):e164–e185. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn JM, Pantanelli SM, Lin CC, et al. Multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses for the treatment of presbyopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(10):1469–1482. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:124–143. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbeito R. Sighting dominance: An explanation based on the processing of visual direction in tests of sighting dominance. Vision Res. 1981;21(6):855–860. 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90185-1 7314462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Documentation M. Trapezoidal numerical integration (trapz function). 2017. https://es.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/trapz.html#bua4lsr.
   Google Scholar
• Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050–1058. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2449–2455.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Bu S, Tian F, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after mix and match implantation of two multifocal intraocular lenses with different adds. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:6789263–6789268. doi: 10.1155/2019/6789263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeely RN, Pazo E, Spence A, et al. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction 3 and 12 months after implantation of a refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(5):633–638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T, Titke C, Böhm M. Trifocal intraocular lens implantation to treat visual demands in various distances following lens removal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;161:71–77.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarty DT, Russell DJ, Ward BM, et al. Comparing visual acuity, range of vision and spectacle independence in the extended range of vision and monofocal intraocular lens. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(8):854–860. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Ogawa S, Manabe S, et al. Binocular visual function of modified pseudophakic monovision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(2):232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Sasaki H, et al. Binocular visual function of myopic pseudophakic monovision. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018;62(3):357–364. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0564-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Jiang C, Zhang M. Pseudophakic monovision is an important surgical approach to being spectacle-free. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(6):481–485. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.86318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrous A, Ciralsky JB, Lai EC. Revisiting monovision for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):313–317. doi: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuijts RM, Jonker SM, Kaufer RA, et al. Bilateral implantation of +2.5 D multifocal intraocular lens and contralateral implantation of +2.5 D and +3.0 D multifocal intraocular lenses: clinical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Calabuig R, Llovet-Rausell A, Ortega-Usobiaga J, et al. Visual outcomes following bilateral lmplantation of two diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses in 10 084 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;179:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora-de La Cruz D, Zuniga-Posselt K, Bartlett J, et al. Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6(6):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter JA, Barclay D, Pelouskova M, et al. Initial experience with a new refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(11):770–776. doi: 10.3928/1081597x-20141021-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan J, Qin Y, Wang C, et al. Visual quality and performance following bilateral implantation of TECNIS symfony intraocular lenses with or without micro-monovision. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1071–1077. doi: 10.2147/opth.S202380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochener B. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: international multicenter concerto study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(9):1268–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm M, Petermann K, Hemkeppler E, et al. Defocus curves of 4 presbyopia-correcting IOL designs: diffractive panfocal, diffractive trifocal, segmental refractive, and extended-depth-of-focus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(11):1625–1636. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, et al. Multifocal intraocular lens differentiation using defocus curves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(7):3920–3926. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Montero M, Albarran Diego C, Garzon-Jimenez N, et al. Binocular vision alterations after refractive and cataract surgery: a review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(2):e145–e155. doi: 10.1111/aos.13891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Holladay JT, Pagano L, et al. Comparison of visual performance and satisfaction with a bilateral emmetropic vs a bilateral mild myopic target using a spherical monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(6):839–843. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Pineda R.2nd. The quest for spectacle independence: a comparison of multifocal intraocular lens implants and pseudophakic monovision for patients with presbyopia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(1):111–115. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2016.1228400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(9):1789–1798. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00722-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandelwal SS, Jun JJ, Mak S, et al. Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):863–875. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masket S, Fram NR. Pseudophakic dysphotopsia: review of incidence, cause, and treatment of positive and negative dysphotopsia. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):e195–e205. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar