789
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Method

Outcomes of a risk assessment and management program using telecare consultation among patients with diabetes mellitus in general out-patient clinic: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2262088 | Received 08 Jun 2023, Accepted 16 Sep 2023, Published online: 25 Sep 2023

References

  • World Health Organization. Diabetes: key facts; 2020.
  • GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 2023; Jul402(10397):1–9.
  • Quan J, Li TK, Pang H, et al. Diabetes incidence and prevalence in Hong Kong, China during 2006–2014. Diabet Med. 2017;34(7):902–908. Juldoi: 10.1111/dme.13284.
  • Luk AO, Ke C, Lau ES, et al. Secular trends in incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Hong Kong: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020; Feb 2017(2):e1003052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003052.
  • Kung K, Chow KM, Hui EM, et al. Prevalence of complications among chinese diabetic patients in urban primary care clinics: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014; Dec15(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-8.
  • McGhee SM, Thomas GN, Schooling CM, et al. Economic burden of diabetes related to excess body weight in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20(3 suppl 3):5. Jun
  • GOPC. Diabetes Management: evidence for Quality Care. Presentation; 2011.
  • Fung CS, Chin WY, Dai DS, et al. Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13(1):116. Decdoi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
  • Wan EY, Fung CS, Wong CK, et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme—diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) on patient-reported outcomes. Endocrine. 2017;55(2):416–426. Febdoi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1124-1.
  • Jiao F, Fung CS, Wan YF, et al. Long-term effects of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management program for patients with diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM): a population-based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14(1):105. Decdoi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0267-3.
  • Imlach F, McKinlay E, Middleton L, et al. Telehealth consultations in general practice during a pandemic lockdown: survey and interviews on patient experiences and preferences. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):269. Decdoi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01336-1.
  • Mignerat M, Lapointe L, Vedel I. Using telecare for diabetic patients: a mixed systematic review. Health Policy and Technology. 2014; Jun 13(2):90–112. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2014.01.004.
  • Shea S, Weinstock RS, Teresi JA, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of the IDEATel study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):446–456. Jul 1doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3157.
  • Lee AYL, Wong AKC, Hung TTM, et al. Nurse-led telehealth intervention for rehabilitation (telerehabilitation) among community-dwelling patients with chronic diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(11):e40364. doi: 10.2196/40364.
  • Wong AKC, Bayuo J, Wong FKY, et al. Sustaining telecare consultations in nurse-led clinics: perceptions of stroke patients and advanced practice nurses: a qualitative study. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231176163. 16doi: 10.1177/20552076231176163.
  • Wong AKC, Bayuo J, Wong FKY, et al. The feasibility and effectiveness of telecare consultations in nurse-led post-acute stroke clinics: a study protocol. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231180759. 12doi: 10.1177/20552076231180759.
  • Kung K, Wong HF, Chen J. An exploratory qualitative study of patients’ views on medical e-consultation in a public primary care setting. The Journal of the Hong Kong College of Family Physicians. 2016;38(4):120–127.
  • Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernández D, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):16. Decdoi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z.
  • RE-AIM working group. Checklist for inclusion of RE-AIM issues by RE-AIM dimension. 2012.
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012; Mar50(3):217–226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
  • Wan EY, Fung CS, Jiao FF, et al. Five-year effectiveness of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme–diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) on diabetes-related complications and health service uses—a population-based and propensity-matched cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2018; Jan 141(1):49–59. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0426.
  • Munch L, Bennich BB, Overgaard D, et al. Management of people with type 2 diabetes shared between a specialized outpatient clinic and primary health care is noninferior to management in a specialized outpatient clinic: a randomized, noninferiority trial. Diabet Med. 2019;36(7):854–861. Juldoi: 10.1111/dme.13896.
  • Salem MT, El-Layeh M, El-Farag SAA, et al. Clinical assessment of different implant-supported esthetic crown systems fabricated with semi-digital workflow: two-year prospective study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(8):1247–1262. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12961.
  • Tabori-Jensen S, Mosegaard SB, Hansen TB, et al. Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(3):246–253. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1720978.
  • Benson GA, Sidebottom A, Hayes J, et al. Impact of ENHANCED (dietitians helping patients care for diabetes) telemedicine randomized controlled trial on diabetes optimal care outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(4):585–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.013.
  • Mingrone PG, Panunzi S, de Gaetano A, et al. Metabolic surgery versus conventional medical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 10-year follow-up of an open-label, single-Centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10271):293–304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32649-0.
  • Chan JC, Sui Y, Oldenburg B, et al. Effects of telephone-based peer support in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving integrated care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; Jun 1174(6):972–981. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.655.
  • Kripalani S, Risser J, Gatti ME, et al. Development and evaluation of the adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS) among low-literacy patients with chronic disease. Value Health. 2009; Jan 112(1):118–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00400.x.
  • Lam ET, Lam CL, Fong DY, et al. Is the SF‐12 version 2 health survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF‐36 version 2 health survey for the chinese? J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(1):200–208. Febdoi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01800.x.
  • Che T, Yan C, Tian D, et al. Time-restricted feeding improves blood glucose and insulin sensitivity in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2021;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12986-021-00613-9.
  • Lee P, Wong F, Wang S, et al. Substitution of SF-36 by SF-12 among Hong Kong chinese older adults: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(5):635–644. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9542-2.
  • Wen KY, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the readiness for implementation model. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(6):707–713. Nov 1doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005546.
  • Nakayama I, Goto A, Hayashino Y, et al. Employment status and diabetic outpatient appointment non-attendance in Middle to senior working generation with type 2 diabetes: the Japan diabetes outcome intervention trial-2 large‑scale trial 005 (J-DOIT2-LT005). Acta Diabetol. 2022; Mar 59(6):793–801. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01869-0.
  • Bedford LK, Weintraub C, Dow AW. Into the storm: a mixed methods evaluation of reasons for non-attendance of appointments in the free clinic setting. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020; Oct 2(11):2271–2277. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00585-6.
  • Pew research center’s internet & technology division rolled out a new report. "Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Information Today. 2017;34(6):22.