The placement of four different supraglottic airway devices by medical students: a manikin study

References

• Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: adult advanced life ­support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soar J, Nolan JP, Böttiger BW, et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2015;95:100–147. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber C, Nabecker S, Wohlfarth P, et al. Evaluation of airway management associated hands-off time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised manikin follow-up study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21(21):10. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-21-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robak O, Leonardelli M, Zedtwitz-Liebenstein K, et al. Feasibility and speed of insertion of seven supraglottic airway devices under simulated airway conditions. CJEM. 2012;14(6):330–334. doi:10.2310/8000.2012.120658.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brain AI. The development of the Laryngeal Mask–a brief history of the invention, early clinical studies and experimental work from which the Laryngeal Mask evolved. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1991;4:5–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, et al. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15(6):428–432. doi:10.1016/s0952-8180(03)00085-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Baek SJ, et al. Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;63(6):510–514. doi:10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kannaujia AM, Srivastava U, Singh T, et al. Evaluation of I-Gel™ versus classic LMA™ for airway management by paramedics and medical students: a manikin study. Anesth Essays Res. 2020;14(1):166–169. doi:10.4103/aer.AER_37_20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson KM, Cook TM. Evaluation of four airway trainingmanikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(4):388–393. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04983.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlen BM, Roewer N, Lange M, et al. Tracheal intubation and alternative airway management devices used by healthcare professionals with different level of pre-existing skills: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(5):549–554. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05812.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroumpoulis K, Isaia C, Bassiakou E, et al. Comparison of the i-gel and classic LMA insertion in manikins by experienced and novice physicians. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012;19(1):24–27. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283474ab3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DW, Kang MJ, Kim YH, et al. Performance of intubation with 4 different airway devices by unskilled rescuers: manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(5):691–696. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle N, Owen R, Hann M, et al. Assessment of the speed and ease of insertion of three supraglottic airway devices by paramedics: a manikin study. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(11):860–863. doi:10.1136/emj.2009.084343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott DA, et al. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(9):991–995. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05542.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes BW, Wharton NM, Gibbison B, et al. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(4):343–347. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06262.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatward JJ, Thomas MJ, Nolan JP, et al. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(3):351–356. doi:10.1093/bja/aem364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakstad AR, Sandberg M. Airway management in simulated restricted access to a patient–can manikin-based studies provide relevant data? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:36. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-19-36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Kabi A, Gaur D. Assessment of success and ease of insertion of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway versus I-gel™ insertion by paramedics in simulated difficult airway using cervical collar in different positions in manikins. Anesth Essays Res. 2020;14(4):627–631. doi:10.4103/aer.AER_72_20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta B, Gupta S, Hijam B, et al. Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices for airway rescue in the prone position: a manikin-based study. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015;8(4):188–192. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.166589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar