A novel rapid measurement method of cervical sagittal parameters based on the integrated inclinometer of a smartphone: a validity and reliability study

References

• Tang R, Ye IB, Cheung ZB, et al. Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment: a radiographic analysis. Spine. 2019;44(19):1–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing R, Liu W, Li X, et al. Characteristics of cervical sagittal parameters in healthy cervical spine adults and patients with cervical disc degeneration. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1951-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rostami M, Moghadam N, Obeid I, et al. The impact of Single-Level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on cervical sagittal parameters and its correlation with pain and functional outcome of patients with neck pain. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(5):899–905. doi: 10.14444/8115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodroffe RW, Helland L, Hollatz C, et al. Impact of the inclusion of C2 in posterior cervical fusions for cervical myelopathy on sagittal cervical alignment. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(4):E141–E146. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Guo R, Yang C, et al. The difference of sagittal correction of adult subaxial cervical spine surgery according to age: a retrospective study. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(8):1790–1798. doi: 10.1111/os.13385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WX, Zhao YB, Lu XD, et al. Influence of extending expansive open-door laminoplasty to C1 and C2 on cervical sagittal parameters. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3083-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhang D, Shen Y. Impact of cervical sagittal parameters on axial neck pain in patients with cervical kyphosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01909-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Hyun SJ, Jain A. Cervical sagittal alignment: literature review and future directions. Neurospine. 2020;17(3):478–496. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040392.196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T, Wang L, Lu C, et al. A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04604-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhang C, Liang H, et al. Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05217-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T, Zhao Z, Wang L, et al. Rapid measurement of thoracolumbar kyphosis with the integrated inclinometer of a smartphone: a validity and reliability study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12690-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang C, Zhong W, et al. Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21660-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Lee SY, Kim YC, et al. T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2013;38(16):E992–997. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182972e1b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto Y, Shigematsu H, Iwata E, et al. Evaluating cervical sagittal alignment in cervical myelopathy: are sitting cervical radiographs and standing whole-Spine radiographs equally useful? Global Spine J. 2019;9(6):591–597. doi: 10.1177/2192568218811841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Lv Y, Lin Y. Correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters in adults without symptoms of cervical spinal disease. Spine . 2020;45(23):E1542–E1548. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balg F, Juteau M, Theoret C, et al. Validity and reliability of the smartphone to measure rib hump in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):774–779. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen T, Rui X, et al. Rapid measurement of lumbosacral spine-pelvic sagittal balance parameters using electronic device. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2020;32(8):3217–3222. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.03.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquot F, Charpentier A, Khelifi S, et al. Measuring the cobb angle with the iPhone in kyphoses: a reliability study. Int Orthop. 2012;36(8):1655–1660. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1579-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JB, Kim IS, Lee JJ, et al. Validity of a smartphone application (sagittalmeter pro) for the measurement of sagittal balance parameters. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:e8–e15. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):328–333. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199072030-00003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marques C, Granstrom E, MacDowall A, et al. Accuracy and reliability of x-ray measurements in the cervical spine. Asian Spine J. 2020;14(2):169–176. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb JR. The problem of the primary curve. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42-A:1413–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar