The AERO prosthetic liner: socket pressure distribution, comfort and material composition

References

• Yuan B, Hu D, Gu S, et al. The global burden of traumatic amputation in 204 countries and territories. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1258853. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 6): mobility, satisfaction, and quality of life among long-term dysvascular/diabetic prosthesis users—results of a cross-sectional analysis. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021;33(3):161–167. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klute GK, Glaister BC, Berge JS. Prosthetic liners for lower limb amputees: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(2):146–153. doi: 10.3109/03093641003645528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Cagle JC, Allyn KJ, et al. Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: survey of prosthetists’ clinical practices. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(2):149–156. doi: 10.1177/0309364616661256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald CL, Westcott-McCoy S, Weaver MR, et al. Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021;45(2):105–114. doi: 10.1177/0309364620972258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. 4th ed. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, USAID. 2017 WHO standards for prosthetics and orthotics [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; [cited 2023 Apr 2]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259209
   Google Scholar
• Wyss D, Lindsay S, Cleghorn WL, et al. Priorities in lower limb prosthetic service delivery based on an international survey of prosthetists in low- and high-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39(2):102–111. doi: 10.1177/0309364613513824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrysek J. Lower-limb prosthetic technologies in the developing world: a review of literature from 1994–2010. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(4):378–398. doi: 10.3109/03093646.2010.520060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Shuaili N, Aslani N, Duff L, et al. Transtibial prosthetic socket design and suspension mechanism: a literature review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019;31(4):224–245. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000258.
   Google Scholar
• Yiğiter K, Sener G, Bayar K. Comparison of the effects of patellar tendon bearing and total surface bearing sockets on prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2002;26(3):206–212. doi: 10.1080/03093640208726649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari MR, Meier MR. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs—part 1: qualitative outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(5):491–508. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safari MR, Meier MR. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs—part 2: quantitative outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(5):509–526. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staats T, Lundt J. The UCLA total surface bearing suction below-knee prosthesis. Clin Prosthetics Orthot. 1987;11:118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Baars ECT, Geertzen JHB. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005;29(1):27–37. doi: 10.1080/17461550500069612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagle JC, Hafner BJ, Sanders JE. Characterization of prosthetic liner products for people with transtibial amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018;30(4):187–199. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adigüzel Zengin AC, Örk N, Yiğit Ü, et al. Leather as a potential liner for the prosthetic leg users. LFJ. 2018;18(4):321–326. doi: 10.24264/lfj.18.4.7.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Nicholson BS, Zachariah SG, et al. Testing of elastomeric liners used in limb prosthetics: classification of 15 products by mechanical performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(2):175–186. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.02.0175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang X, Zhao R, Solav D, et al. Material, design, and fabrication of custom prosthetic liners for lower-extremity amputees: a review. Med Nov Technol Dev. 2023;17:100197. doi: 10.1016/j.medntd.2022.100197.
   Google Scholar
• Boutwell E, Stine R, Hansen A, et al. Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(2):227–240. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.06.0121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bui KM, Raugi GJ, Nguyen VQ, et al. Skin problems in individuals with lower-limb loss: literature review and proposed classification system. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(9):1085–1090. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki K, Guerra G, Rattanakoch J, et al. Sustainable development: a below-knee prostheses liner for resource limited environments. J Med Dev. 2020;14(1):014501. doi: 10.1115/1.4045835.
   Google Scholar
• Miyata Y, Sasaki K, Guerra G, et al. Sustainable, affordable and functional: reimagining prosthetic liners in resource limited environments. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(12):2941–2947. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1844316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, et al. The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):613–627. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar S, Khodasevych I, Troynikov O. Evaluation of flexible force sensors for pressure monitoring in treatment of chronic venous disorders. Sensors. 2017;17(8):1923. doi: 10.3390/s17081923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson EC, Weathersby EJ, Cagle JC, et al. Evaluation of force sensing resistors for the measurement of interface pressures in lower limb prosthetics. J Biomech Eng. 2019;141(10):1010091–10100913. doi: 10.1115/1.4043561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Fakih E, Abu Osman N, Mahmad Adikan F. Techniques for interface stress measurements within prosthetic sockets of transtibial amputees: a review of the past 50 years of research. Sensors. 2016;16(7):1119. doi: 10.3390/s16071119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins MO, Turner S, Vaidyanathan R, et al. Mapping lower-limb prosthesis load distributions using a low-cost pressure measurement system. Front Med Technol. 2022;4:908002. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.908002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajtukova V, Hudak R, Zivcak J, et al. Pressure distribution in transtibial prostheses socket and the stump interface. Proc Eng. 2014;96:374–381. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.106.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Guerra G, Lei Phyu W, et al. Assessment of socket pressure during walking in rapid fit prosthetic sockets. Sensors. 2022;22(14):5224. doi: 10.3390/s22145224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspal R, Fisher K, Nieveen R. Prosthetic socket fit comfort score. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(22):1278–1280. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001603983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhokare SS, Biradar VR, Chakole RD, et al. Applications of FTIR spectroscopy. Review. 2022;7:213–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ, Askew RL, et al. Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(6):797–812., CPOdoi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.12.0228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sewell P, Noroozi S, Vinney J, et al. Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach. Artif Intell Med. 2012;54(1):29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Cagle JC, Allyn KJ, et al. How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(2):201–212., BSEdoi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.04.0085.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumbleton T, Buis AWP, McFadyen A, et al. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts. JRRD. 2009;46(3):405. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2008.01.0015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu Osman NA, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE, et al. The patellar tendon bar! Is it a necessary feature? Med Eng Phys. 2010;32(7):760–765. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho K-Y, Harty M, Kellogg J, et al. Patellar tendon morphology in trans-tibial amputees utilizing a prosthesis with a patellar-tendon-bearing feature. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52747-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Öksüz M, Yıldırım H. Effect of calcium carbonate on the mechanical and thermal properties of isotactic polypropylene/ethylene vinyl acetate blends. J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;96(4):1126–1137. doi: 10.1002/app.21555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar