Sleeping with the enemy? Capturing internal risks in the logical framework of a water management project

References

• Akroyd, D. (1999). Logical framework approach to project planning, socio-economic analysis and to monitoring and evaluation services: A smallholder rice project. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 17, 54–66. doi:10.3152/147154699781768007.
   Google Scholar
• Armytage, L. (2011). Evaluating aid: An adolescent domain of practice. Evaluation, 17, 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011410518.
   Google Scholar
• Aune, J. B. (2000). Logical framework approach and PRA - mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning?. Development in Practice, 10, 687–690. doi:10.1080/09614520020008850.
   Google Scholar
• Bakewell, O., & Garbutt, A. (2005). The use and abuse of the logical framework approach Swedish international development cooperation agency. Stockholm: SIDA.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (1987). Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Project Appraisal, 2, 251–259. doi:10.1080/02688867.1987.9726638.
   Google Scholar
• Conboy, K. (2008). Project failure en mass: A study of loose budgetary control in ISD projects. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 8(40), 1–14. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/8-40.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, D. (1995). Integrating the logical framework into the management of technical cooperation projects. Project Appraisal, 10, 103–112. doi:10.1080/02688867.1995.9726981.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (2003). The logical framework: An easy escape, a straitjacket, or a useful planning tool? Development in Practice, 13, 57–70. doi:10.1080/0961452022000037982.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, P., & Kowalski, B. (2003). Programme and project cycle management (PPCM): Lessons from South and North. Development in Practice, 13, 501–514. doi:10.1080/0961452032000125875.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2000). Evaluating the ‘Logical framework approach’ towards learning-oriented development evaluation. Public Administration and Development, 20, 17–28. 3.0.CO;2-5’>10.1002/1099-162X(200002)20:13.0.CO;2-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermano, V., López-Paredes, A., Martín-Cruz, N., & Pajares, J. (2013). How to manage international development (ID) projects successfully. Is the PMD Pro1 guide going to the right direction? International Journal of Project Management, 31, 22–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelbrunner, R. (2010). Beyond logframe: Critique, variations and alternatives. In N. Fujita (Ed.), Beyond Logframe: Using systems concepts in evaluation. Issues and prospects of evaluation for international development – series – IV (pp. 300–316). Japan: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (FASID), Commissioned by the Ministry of Foreign Affair of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• ICF. (2012). ICF GHK Independent Evaluation of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund in Sudan. Prepared for the World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, M. (2009). Managing programs & projects for effectiveness and sustainability: The logical framework approach. Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
   Google Scholar
• IWRM-Fergana. (2013). Progress report for the period of March 1 – December 31, 2012. (Report under the Integrated Water Resources Management in the Fergana Valley – Phase VI). Tashkent: IWMI and SIC ICWC. Tashkent.
   Google Scholar
• Jägerskog, A., & Zeitoun, M. (2009). Getting Transboundary water right: Theory and practice for effective cooperation. (Report No. 25). Stockholm: SIWI.
   Google Scholar
• Khanal, N., Mool, P., Shrestha, A., Rasul, G., Ghimire, P., Shrestha, R., & Joshi, S. (2015). A comprehensive approach and methods for glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment, with examples from Nepal and the Transboundary area. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31, 219–237. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.994116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, K. (2001). Energy and Environmental Security in Central Asia: The Syr Darya. Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
   Google Scholar
• Libert, B., Orolbaev, E., & Steklov, Y. (2008). Water and energy crisis in Central Asia. In China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 6, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, H. L. (2011). Water, International Development and Collective Action: An impact Assessment of an Irrigation Management Project in Southern Kyrgyzstan. (A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy and Political Science. University of Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Megoran, N. (2006). For ethnography in political geography: Experiencing and re-imagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures. Political Geography, 25, 622–640. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert, E. (2005). How can international donors promote Transboundary water management?  (Discussion Paper). Bonn, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.
   Google Scholar
• Mowles, C. (2010). Successful or not? Evidence, emergence, and development management. Development in Practice, 20, 757–770. doi:10.1080/09614524.2010.508110.
   Google Scholar
• Odame, H. (2001). Engendering the logical framework. Washington, DC: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR) Publications, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)..
   Google Scholar
• Örtengren, K. (2004). The logical framework approach. Stockholm: Swedish Development Agency (Sida).
   Google Scholar
• PA. (2004). Report of external review of phase ii and recommendations for phase iii of the integrated water resources management in the Ferghana valley project. Washington DC, USA: PA Government Services, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Periasamy, P. (2010). A textbook of financial cost and management accounting: Revised edition. Mumbai, India: Himalaya Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, Y. (2009). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty. (PhD Thesis). Canada: Université du Québec à Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (2003). Beyond the comfort zone: Some issues, questions, and challenges in thinking about development approaches and methods. In D. Eade (Ed.), Development methods and approaches: Critical reflections: Selected essays from Development in Practice (pp. 1–20). Oxford, UK: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Rysbekov, Y. (2007). Report on the Transboundary small Rivers component (Jan 2007-Apr 2008). (Project report under the Integrated Water Resources Management in Ferghana Valley (Phase III)). Project funded by SDC and implemented by IWMI and SIC ICWC. Tashkent: Scientific Information Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, P. L., George, D., & Comino, M. (2015). Cumulative risk management, coal seam gas, sustainable water, and agriculture in Australia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 1–19. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.994593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnutzer, A., & Studer, C. (2010). Report of the external review of the integrated water resources management Ferghana Valley project IWRM-Ferghana phase IV: May 2008 to December 2010. Tashkent: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).
   Google Scholar
• Tarnutzer, A., Studer, C., Talipova, L., Sheraliyev, N., & Oymatov, Kh (2008). Report of the external review of the integrated water resources management Ferghana Valley project IWRM-Ferghana phase III: May 2005 to April 2008. Tashkent: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, T., & Mirzaev, B. (2011). Review of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation in the Water Management Sector in Central Asia. Final Report. Tashkent: SDC/SCO.
   Google Scholar
• Uitto, J. I. (2004). Multi-country cooperation around shared waters: Role of monitoring and evaluation. Global Environmental Change, 14, 5–14. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USAID. (2012). The Logical Framework. (Technical Note Number 2). Retrieved from https://usaidlearninglab.org/sites/default/files/resource/files/2012_12%20Logical%20Framework%20Technical%20Note_final%20%282%29.pdf (accessed April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2008). Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26, 563–577. doi:10.1080/01446190801998708.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerich, K. (2008). Passing over the conflict. The chu talas basin agreement as a model for central Asia? In M. Rahaman & O. Varis (Eds.), Central Asian waters (pp. 117–132). Espoo: Water & Development Publications, Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerich, K., Kazbekov, J., Kabilov, F., & Mukhamedova, N. (2012). Meso-level cooperation on Transboundary Tributaries and infrastructure in Ferghana Valley. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28, 525–543. doi:10.1080/07900627.2012.684314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerich, K., Kazbekov, J., Mukhamedova, N., & Musayev, S. (2012). Is it possible to shift to hydrological boundaries? The Ferghana Valley meshed system. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28, 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.684316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinthal, E. (2001). Sins of omission: Constructing negotiating sets in the Aral Sea basin. Journal of Environment and Development, 10, 50–79.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Shields, D. (1995). Clarifying the ‘logical framework’ as a tool for planning and managing development projects. Project Appraisal, 10, 2–12. doi:10.1080/02688867.1995.9726968.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2001). Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, lessons learned. In international conference on freshwater. (Thematic Background Papers). Bonn: International Conference on Freshwater.
   Google Scholar