The Australian Murray–Darling Basin Plan: challenges in its implementation (part 1)

References

• Australian Government (2012). Water Act 2007 – Basin Plan 2012, Extract for the Federalcommonwealth Register of Legislative Instruments (28 November 2012). Canberra: Australian Government, Office of Parliamentary Counsel.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government (2013). Water Act 2007 (with Amendments). Canberra: Australian Government, Office of Parliamentary Counsel.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government (2014). Water Recovery Strategy for the Murray–Darling Basin. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. (Ed.). (2007). Eau Canada: The future of Canada’s water. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bark, R., Kirby, M., Connor, J. D., & Crossman, N. D. (2014). Water allocation reform to meet environmental uses while sustaining irrigation: A case study of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Water Policy, 16, 739–754.10.2166/wp.2014.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloff, M. J., Lavorel, S., Wise, R. M., Dunlop, M., Overton, I. C. and Williams, K. J. (2015). Adaptation services of floodplains and wetlands under transformational climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology (in review).
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D., & Grafton, R. Q. (Eds.). (2011). Basin futures: Water reform in the Murray–Darling basin. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, C. (2012). Main messages. In United Nations World Water Development Report 4; Vol. 1 – Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk (pp. 1–16). Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Crase, L. (2012). The Murray–Darling Basin Plan – an adaptive response to ongoing challenges? Economic Papers, 31, 318–326.10.1111/j.1759-3441.2012.00187.x
   Google Scholar
• Crase, L., O’Keefe, S., & Kinoshota, Y. (2012). Enhancing agri-environmental outcomes: Market-based approaches to water in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin. Water Resources Research, 48, doi:10.1029/2012WR012140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crase, L., O’Keefe, S., & Pawsey, N. (2013). A note on contradictions in Australian water policy. Economic Papers, 32, 353–359.10.1111/ecpa.2013.32.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• CSIRO. (2010). The groundwater SDL methodology for the Murray–Darling Basin Plan. CSIRO, Canberra: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship.
   Google Scholar
• Daniell, K. A., & Barrateau, O. (2014). Water governance across competing scales: Coupling land and water management. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2367–2380.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniell, K. A., Coomes, P. J., & White, L. (2014). Politics of innovation in multi-level water governance systems. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2415–2435.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Beck, H. E., Crosbie, R. S., & Jeu, R. A. M. d., Liu, Y. Y., Podger, G. M., … Viney, N. R., (2013). The millennium drought in southeast Australia (2001-2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resources Research, 49, 1040–1057.10.1002/wrcr.20123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. (2012). Report on the implementation of the water framework directive (2000/60/EC): River basin management plans. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, P. H., Allen, L., Christian-Smith, J., Cohen, M. J., Cooley, H., Heberger, M., … Schulte, P. (2011). The World’s Water: Volume 7. Washington, DC: Island Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-59726-228-6
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, N. D., McMahon, T. A., Finlayson, B. L., Gippel, C. J., & Nathan, R. J. (2004). Stream Hydrology – an Introduction for Ecologists (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q., Libecap, G. D., Edwards, E. C., O'Brien, R. J., & Landry, C. (2012). Comparative assessment of water markets: Insights from the Murray–Darling Basin of Australia and the Western USA. Water Policy, 14, 175–193.10.2166/wp.2011.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q., Pittock, J., Davis, R., Williams, J., Guobin Fu, G., Warburton, M., … Quiggin, J., (2013). Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nature Climate Change, 3, 315–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q., Pittock, J., Williams, J., Jiang, Q., Possingham, H., & Quiggin, J. (2014). Water planning and hydro-climatic change in the Murray–Darling basin, Australia. Ambio, 43, 1082–1092.10.1007/s13280-014-0495-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, B. T. (2015a). The Murray–Darling Basin Plan: 1. factors leading to its successful development. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B. T. (2015b). The Australian Murray–Darling Basin Plan: challenges in its implementation (part 2). International Journal of Water Resources Development. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2015.1084494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, J. (2013). Australian water policy in a climate change context: some reflections. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29, 137–151.10.1080/07900627.2013.725537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, J. (2014). The 2012 Murray–Darling Basin Plan – issues to watch. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30, 152–163.10.1080/07900627.2013.787833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRP. (2015). SDL adjustment ecological elements method development report: Review of the final report. Canberra: Report of the Independent Review Panel to the Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Q., & Grafton, R. Q. (2012). Economic effects of climate change in the Murray–Darling basin, Australia. Agricultural Systems, 110, 10–16.10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildea, P., & Williams, G. (2010). The constitution and the management of water in Australia’s rivers. Sydney Law Review, 32, 595–616.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2010). Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan. Vol. 1 Overview. – Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2011a). The living Murray story. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Report, No. 157/11.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2011b). The proposed ‘environmentally sustainable level of take’ for surface water of the Murray–Darling basin: Methods and outcomes. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority. November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2012). The socio-economic implications of the proposed Basin Plan. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority. May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2013a). Handbook for practitioners: Water resource plan requirements. Canberra: Murray–Darling basin Authority. October 2103.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2013b). Constraints management strategy 2013-2024. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Publication No. 28/13.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2014). Constraints management strategy annual progress report 2013–14. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2015a). Towards a healthy, working Murray–Darling basin: Basin Plan annual report 2013-14. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Publication No. 46/14.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. (2015b). The northern basin review. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. O., Frederiksen, P., Saarikoski, H., Rytkönen, A.-M., & Pedersen, A. B. (2013). How different institutional arrangements promote integrated river basin management. Evidence from the Baltic Sea Region, Land Use Policy, 30, 437–445.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NWC. (2004). Intergovernmental agreement on a national water initiative. Canberra: National Water Commission. p. 39.
   Google Scholar
• NWC. (2009). Australian water reform 2009: Second biennial assessment of progress in the implementation of the national water initiative. Canberra: National Water Commission.
   Google Scholar
• NWC. (2014). National water initiative – ten-year anniversary. Canberra: National Water Commission.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Water governance in OECD countries: A multi-level approach, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, I. C., Pollino, C. A., Roberts, J., Reid, J. R. W., Bond, N. R., McGinness, H., … Doody, T. M., (2014). Development of the Murray–Darling Basin Plan SDL adjustment ecological elements method. Canberra: Report by CSIRO for the Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Pegram, G., Li, Y., Le Quesne, T., Speed, J., Li, J., & Shen, F. (2013). River Basin Planning: Principles. UNESCO, Paris: Procedures and Approaches for Strategic Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, M. E., Hanjra, M. A., & Ward, J. (2013). Impact of water scarcity in Australia on global food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy, 38, 136–145.10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swirepik, J. L., Burns, I. C., Dyer, F. J., Neave, I. A., O'Brien, M. G., Pryde, G. M., & Thompson, R. M. (2015). Science informed policy: Establishing environmental water needs for Australia’s largest and most developed river basin. River Research and Applications (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2012). United nations world water development report 4: Vol. 1 – managing water under uncertainty and risk. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 909 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés-Pineda, R., Pizarro, R., García-Chevesich, P., Valdés, J. B., Olivares, C., Vera, M., … Helwig, B. (2014). Water governance in Chile: Availability, management and climate change. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2538–2567.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. & Cheesman, J. (2013). Key findings from a survey of sellers to the restoring the balance program. Economic Papers, 32, 340–352.10.1111/ecpa.2013.32.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S., Zuo, A., Bjornlund, H., & Lane-Miller, C. (2012). Selling the farm silver? understanding water sales to the Australian government. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 52, 133–154.10.1007/s10640-011-9523-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (2013). The blue paper: Water Co-Governance in Canada, Forum for Leadership on Water (FLOW) (http://www.flowcanada.org/document/374).
   Google Scholar
• Wittwer, G., & Dixon, J. (2013). Effective use of public funding in the Murray–Darling Basin: A comparison of buybacks and infrastructure upgrades. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 57, 399–421.10.1111/ajar.2013.57.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-C. E., Brown, C., Yu, W., Wescoat, J., & Ringler, C. (2014). Water governance and adaptation to climate change in the Indus River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2527–2537.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar