Participatory water governance between theories and practices: learning from a community-based initiative in India

References

• Acharya, S. K., & Parikh, H. (2002). Slum networking in Ahmedabad. An alternative paradigm. In A. Kundu, & D. Mahadevia (Eds.), Poverty and vulnerability in a globalising metropolis. Ahmedabad (pp. 309–348). New Delhi: Manak.
   Google Scholar
• Aga Khan Award for Architecture. (1998). Slum networking of Indore city. Retrieved from https://www.akdn.org/sites/akdn/files/media/documents/AKAA%20press%20kits/1998%20AKAA/Slum%20Networking%20-%20India.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahlers, R., Cleaver, F., Rusca, M., & Schwartz, K. (2014). Informal space in the urban waterscape: Disaggregation and co-production of water services. Water Alternatives, 7(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (n.d.). Housing status of AMC under various schemes/programme/policies. Retrieved from https://www.igep.in/live/hrdpmp/hrdpmaster/igep/content/e48745/e49028/e61137/e61739/e61755/housingunderdiffpolicy14.10.2014_AMC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahmedabad Study Action Group. (1992). List of dilapidated housing in Ahmedabad ( Unpublished Report for the AMC).
   Google Scholar
• Akhmouch, A., & Clavreul, D. (2016). Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance: ‘Practicing what we preach’ with the OECD water governance initiative. Water, 8, 204. doi:10.3390/w8050204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, S. (n.d.). Best practices in slum improvement: The case of Ahmedabad, India ( Report prepared for the Institute for Financial Management and Research, Chennai). Retrieved from https://www.housingfinanceforthepoor.com/data/images/casablanca%20best%20practices%20in%20slum%20improvement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18, 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baber, W. F., & Barlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics: Democracy and ecological rationality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baruah, B. (2007). Gendered realities: Exploring property ownership and tenancy relationships in Urban India. World Development, 35, 2096–2109. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, V. A. (2002). Covert planning for social transformation in Indonesia. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 15–25. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202200102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatkal, T., Avis, W., & Nicolai, S. (2015). Towards a better life? A cautionary tale of progress in Ahmedabad ( ODI Case Study Report – Urban Poverty). London: Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9664.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bierschenk, T. (1988). Development projects as arenas of negotiation for strategic groups. Sociologia Ruralis, 28, 146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1988.tb01035.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. K. (2004). Integrated water resources management: A reassessment. Water International, 29, 248–256. doi:10.1080/02508060408691775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. K. (2008). Integrated water resources management: Is it working? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 5–22. doi:10.1080/07900620701871718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, M. (1998). Learning what works. A 20 year retrospective view on international water and sanitation cooperation. Washington, DC: UNDP-WB Water and Sanitation Program.
   Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996). Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context. Gland: IUCN-The World Conservation Union.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, N., Lele, A., Starkl, M., & Grassini, L. (2010). Water sector reform policy of India: Experiences from case studies in Maharashtra. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, 544–561. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cars, G., Healey, P., Madanipour, A., & de Magalhaes, C. (Eds.). (2002). Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• CEPT. (2014). Ahmedabad slum free city action plan ( Report prepared by CEPT University’s Centre for Research and Development Foundation for the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation). Retrieved from https://pas.org.in/Portal/document/PIP%20Application/Ahmedabad%20Slum%20Free%20City%20Action%20Plan%20RAY.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22, 953–969. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? London: Intermediate Technology Publications.10.3362/9781780440453
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (2001). The world development report: Concepts, content and a chapter 12. Journal of International Development, 13, 299–306. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1328
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. (1999). Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development, 11, 597–612. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1328
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., & Davidson, S. (2011). The watershed approach: Challenges, antecedents, and the transition from technical tool to governance unit. Water Alternatives, 4(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, 8, 213–235. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K., & Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: Social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, 358–373. doi:10.1002/eet.v19:6
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A., & Moote, M. A. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 371–386. doi:10.1080/08941920309181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cundill, G. (2010). Monitoring social learning processes in adaptive comanagement: Three case studies from South Africa. Ecology and Society, 15, 28. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art28/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A. K. (2015). Participatory slum upgrading: Lessons from post-decentralization India and Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Regional Development and Environment, 1, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A. K., & Takahashi, L. M. (2009). Evolving institutional arrangements, scaling up, and sustainability. Emerging issues in participatory slum upgrading in Ahmedabad, India. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 213–232. doi:10.1177/0739456X09348613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2004). Scaling up urban upgrading: Where are the bottlenecks? International Development Planning Review, 26, 305–324. doi:10.3828/idpr.26.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., Tankha, S., Ghosh, A., Martin, P., Samad, T., Zia, B., & Prunier, G. (2001). Good governance in the water and sanitation sector: Experience from South Asia. New Delhi: Water and Sanitation Program.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroot, D. (2001, April). Options to up-scale upgrading and water and sanitation services at the community level ( Unpublished report prepared for the UNDP-WB Water and Sanitation Program/South Asia).
   Google Scholar
• Doornbos, M. (2001). Good governance: The rise and decline of a policy methaphor? Journal of Development Studies, 37, 93–108. doi:10.1080/713601084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S. S. (2000). Partnerships in urban development: A review of Ahmedabad's experience. Environment and Urbanization, 12, 13–26. doi:10.1177/095624780001200102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, D., & Wollenberg, E. (2002). Disadvantaged groups in multistakeholder negotiations ( CIFOR Programme Report). Retrieved from https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Strategic_Negotiation_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013). On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory, 12, 5–22. doi:10.1177/1473095212448750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, M., & Shah, T. (2014). From IWRM back to integrated water resources management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30, 364–376. doi:10.1080/07900627.2013.851521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership Technical Advisory Committee. (2000). Integrated water resources management ( TAC Background Papers Series No. 4). Stockholm: Global Water Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India & the World Bank. (1999a). Rural water and sanitation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India & the World Bank (1999b). Initiating and sustaining water sector reform: A synthesis. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Grassini, L. (2011). Buone Prassi per Chi? Politiche di Sviluppo e Pratiche Interpretative in India [Good practices for whom? Development policies and interpretative practices in India]. Firenze: Alinea.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action (Vols. I and II). [T. A. McCarthy, Trans.]. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2001). Changing the conditions for development aid: A new paradigm? Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 1–16. doi:10.1080/713601080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1967). Development projects observed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P., Franceys, R., Mekala, S., Smits, S., & James, A. J. (2017). Revisiting the history, concepts and typologies of community management for rural drinking water supply in India. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/07900627.2016.1145576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indo-US Financial Institutions Reform and Expansion Project. (1999). The Ahmedabad municipal bond issue: India’s first without a guaranty ( Project Notes No. 17). Retrieved from https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnack576.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Water and the Environment. (1992). The dublin statement on water and sustainable development. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R., & Watson, D. (2007). Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland's water. Ecology and Society, 12, 21. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art21/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kailashnathan, K. (2001). A proposal to create a special purpose vehicle for handling the task of slum upgradation in the city of Ahmedabad: Constitution, functions, duties, financial implications of the SPV, etc. ( Unpublished report prepared for the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. (2002). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? The relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe debate for third world politics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27, 459–487. doi:10.1177/030437540202700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, M., Brown, V., & Dybal, R. (2005). Social learning in environmental management. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Korten, D. C. (1980). Community organisations and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 40, 480–511. doi:10.2307/3110204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korten, F. F. (1983). Community participation: A management perspective on obstacles and options. In D. C. Korten, & F. B. Alfonso (Eds.), Bureaucracy and the poor: Closing the gap (pp. 181–200). West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, M., Dionnet, M., Hammani, A., Bekkar, Y., Garin, P., & Bluemling, B. (2009). Supporting the shift from state water to community water: Lessons from a social learning approach to designing joint irrigation projects in Morocco. Ecology and Society, 14, 19. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art19/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Cecla, F. (1997). Il Malinteso: Antropologia dell’Incontro [Mistaken identity: Anthropology of cultural meeting]. Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 645–670. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change, 31, 931–959. doi:10.1111/dech.2000.31.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeckx, A., Shannon, K., Tuts, R., & Verschure, H. (Eds.). (2004). Urban trialogues: Visions, projects, coproductions. Nairobi: UN Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• Maarleveld, M., & Dabgbégnon, C. (1999). Managing natural resources: A social learning perspective. Agriculture and Human Values, 16, 267–280. doi:10.1023/A:1007559903438
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevia, D., Desai, R., & Vyas, S. (2014). City profile: Ahmedabad ( CUE Working Paper No. 26). Ahmedabad: CEPT University. Retrieved from https://cept.ac.in/UserFiles/File/CUE/Working%20Papers/Revised%20New/24%20City%20Profile%20Guwahat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E., & Rigg, J. (2003). The world development report II: Continuity and change in development ortodoxies. Progress in Development Studies, 3, 271–286. doi:10.1191/1464993403ps065oa
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2004). Deliberative democracy. In R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Environmental governance reconsidered: Challenges, choices, and opportunities (pp. 183–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, J. (Ed.). (1995). Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, D., & Mehta, M. (2011, August). Reaching the poor: Slum networking project in Ahmedabad, India. Paper presented at the 2011 World Water Week, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state: Coproduction as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20, 339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2001). People’s knowledge, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tàbara, D., & Tippett, J. (2007). Social learning in European river-basin management: Barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society, 12, 19. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neef, A. (2009). Transforming rural water governance: Towards deliberative and polycentric models? Water Alternatives, 2, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Sustainable management of water resources in agriculture. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807763
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development, 24, 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Towards sustainability in the water sector: The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquatic Sciences, 64, 394–411. doi:10.1007/PL00012594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2006). The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society, 11, 10. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art10/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society, 12, 5. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, H. (1997). Community based sanitation and environmental improvement programme: Experiences from Indore, Baroda and Ahmedabad ( Project Paper No. 10). Rotterdam: Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh, H. (1998). Architect’s record of slum networking of Indore city ( Report submitted for the Aga Khan Award for Architecture). Retrieved from https://archnet.org/system/publications/contents/452/original/FLS0457.pdf?1384747805
   Google Scholar
• Parkins, J. R., & Mitchell, R. E. (2005). Public participation as public debate: A deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 529–540. doi:10.1080/08941920590947977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parson, E. A., & Clark, W. C. (1995). Sustainable development as social learning: Theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research program. In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, & S. S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 428–461). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S., Sliuzas, R., & Mathur, N. (2015). The risk of impoverishment in urban development-induced displacement and resettlement in Ahmedabad. Environment and Urbanization, 27, 231–256. doi:10.1177/0956247815569128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, S. (1987). Community participation in development projects: The world bank experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., … Stringer, L. C. (2006). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15, r1. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
   Google Scholar
• Rist, S., Chidambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning process in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 23–37. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röling, N., & Maarleveld, M. (1999). Facing strategic narratives: In which we argue interactive effectiveness. Agriculture and Human Values, 16, 295–308. doi:10.1023/A:1007595530813
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25, 3–29. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (Eds.). (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schusler, T. M., Decker, D. J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 309–326. doi:10.1080/08941920390178874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr, & A. K. S. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development: Concepts, measures and policies for a development paradigm (pp. 3–16). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, N. (1991). Managing common property irrigation in India and the Philippines. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K. (1994). Managing common pool resources: Principles and case studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skollerhorn, E. (1998). Habermas and nature: The theory of communicative action for studying environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41, 555–573. doi:10.1080/09640569811452
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the post–Washington consensus ( WIDER Annual Lectures No. 2). Helsinki: The United Nations University – World Institute for Development Economics Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2008). Is there a post-Washington consensus consensus? In N. Serra & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), The Washington consensus reconsidered (pp. 41–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534081.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse. Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook. A comprehensive guide to reach agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Das, D. K. (2008). Participatory irrigation management in India: Implementations and gaps. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture, 3, 28–39. doi:10.11178/jdsa.3.28
   Google Scholar
• Tortajada, C. (2010). Water governance: Some critical issues. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26, 297–307. doi:10.1080/07900621003683298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi, D. (1998). Alliance for change. A slum upgrading experiment in Ahmedabad. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, D. (1999). Slum networking in Ahmedabad: The Sanjay nagar pilot project ( Working paper No. 101). London: UCL. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/drivers_urb_change/urb_governance/pdf_partic_proc/DPU_Tripathi_Ahmedabad_Sanjay_Nagar_Project.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, D., & Jumani, J. (2000). Change after alliance. Sequel to alliance for change. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP-WB Water and Sanitation Program. (1999). Ahmedabad Parivartan (field notes). New Delhi: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (1998). Ahmedabad: Innovative urban partnerships India ( Record of UN-HABITAT Best Practices Database). Retrieved from https://mirror.unhabitat.org/bp/bp.list.details.aspx?bp_id=3509
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2002). Ahmedabad Parivartan programme ( Record of UN-HABITAT Best Practices Database). Retrieved from https://mirror.unhabitat.org/bp/bp.list.details.aspx?bp_id=3353
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2003). Handbook on best practices, security of tenure and access to land − Implementation of the habitat agenda. Nairobi: Author. Retireved from https://www.chs.ubc.ca/archives/files/Handbook%20of%20Best%20Practices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2006). Ahmedabad slum networking programme ( Record of UN-HABITAT Best Practices Database). Retrieved from https://mirror.unhabitat.org/bp/bp.list.details.aspx?bp_id=1762
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Rio declaration on environment and development: Agenda 21. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (1986). Getting the process right: Improving irrigation water management with farmer organization and participation ( Working Paper for the Water Management Synthesis II Project). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (2000). Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 215–249). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N., Esman, M. J., & Krishna, A. (1998). Reasons for success: Learning from instructive experiences in rural development. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N., & Wijayaratna, C. (2000). Demonstrated benefits from social capital: The productivity of farmer organisations in Gal Oya. World Development, 28, 1875–1890. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00063-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J. P. M., & Leroy, P. (2003). Environment and participation in a context of political modernisation. Environmental Values, 12, 155–174. doi:10.3197/096327103129341270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermillion, D. L., & Sagardoy, J. A. (1999). Transfer of irrigation management services: Guidelines ( FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 58). Rome: IWMI, GTZ, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. F. (2006). More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22, 15–35. doi:10.1080/07900620500404992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WB-UNCHS. (1999). Cities alliance for cities without slums. Action plan for moving slum upgrading to scale. Retrieved from https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/ActionPlan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T. (1995). ‘Right’ discourse in public participation: An evaluative yardstick. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedermann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse (pp. 36–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T. (1999). The craft and theory of public participation: A dialectical process. Journal of Risk Research, 2, 55–71. doi:10.1080/136698799376989
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 240–246. doi:10.2307/975377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1991). World development report. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1993). Water resources management. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1997). World development report: The state in a changing world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press and the World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1998). Assessing aid: What works what doesn’t and why. New York, NY: Oxford University Press and the World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000). World development report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2001). Gujarat urban reform project ( Project Information Document No. 10771). Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/762171468750262274/pdf/multi0page.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2004). Water resources sector strategy. Strategic directions for World Bank engagement. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Water and Sanitation Program. (2009a). Improving water supply and sanitation services for the urban poor in India (Guidance notes). New Delhi: Water and Sanitation Program – South Asia. Retrieved from https://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/SA_GUIDANCENOTES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Water and Sanitation Program. (2009b). Global experiences on expanding services to the urban poor ( Accompanying volume to the guidance notes on ‘improving water supply and sanitation services for the urban poor in India’). New Delhi: Water and Sanitation Program – South Asia. Retrieved from https://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/SA_GUIDANCENOTES_globaleg.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar