Government facilitation of external initiatives: how Dutch water authorities cope with value dilemmas

References

• Alexander, M., Priest, S., & Mees, H. (2016). A framework for evaluating flood risk governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 64, 38–47. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. K., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing case studies. Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Houndsmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, I., & Brandsen, T. (2014). State–third sector partnerships: A short overview of key issues in the debate. Public Management Review, 16, 1055–1066. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.957344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, H., & Dicke, W. (2006). Strategies for safeguarding public values in liberalized utility sectors. Public Administration, 84, 717–735. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, A., Klijn, E. H., & Edelenbos, J. (2012). Democratic legitimacy of new forms of water management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28, 629–645. doi:10.1080/07900627.2011.627756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, A., Eshuis, J., & Bressers, N. E. W. (2015). The governance of innovation in dutch regional water management: Organizing fit between organizational values and innovative concepts. Public Management Review, 17, 679–697. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2014). Tax guide. Peru 2014. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/pe/Documents/tax/tax_guide%202014-rev.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2006). Public-Private Collaboration. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 496–525). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., Van Buuren, A., Roth, D., & Winnubst, M. (2017). Stakeholder initiatives in flood risk management: Exploring the role and impact of bottom-up initiatives in three ‘Room for the River’ projects in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 47–66. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1140025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., van Meerkerk, I., & Koppenjan, J. (2017). The challenge of innovating politics in community self-organization: The case of Broekpolder. Public Management Review, 19, 55–73. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1200663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquharson, E., Torres de Mästle, C., Yescombe, E. R., & Encinas, J. (2011). How to engage with the private sector in public-private partnerships in emerging markets. Washington, DC: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7863-2
   Google Scholar
• Fliervoet, J. M., & Van den Born, R. J. G. (2016). From implementation towards maintenance: Sustaining collaborative initiatives for integrated floodplain management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resource Management, 33, 570–590. doi:10.1080/07900627.2016.1200962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810503
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Jhagroe, S., & Howlett, M. (2016). Greening the state? The framing of sustainability in Dutch infrastructure governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society, 48, 1101–1127. doi:10.1177/0095399714532273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotenbreg, S., & Van Buuren, A. (2016). Realizing innovative public waterworks: Aligning administrative capacities in collaborative innovation processes. Journal of Cleaner Production. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.128
   Google Scholar
• Grotenbreg, S., & Van Buuren, A. (2017). Facilitation as a governance strategy: Unravelling governments’ facilitation frames. Sustainability, 9, 160–178. doi:10.3390/su9010160
   Google Scholar
• Hampden-Turner, C. (1990). Charting the corporate mind: From Dilemma to strategy. Oxford: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy. New forms of social and economic governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hufen, J. A. M., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2015). Local renewable energy cooperatives: Revolution in disguise? Environment, development and sustainability, 18(5), 1–14. doi:10.1186/s13705-015-0046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. E. (2005). Managing to collaborate. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L., & Priest, S. J. (2008). Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 513–525. doi:10.1080/07900620801923146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J., Kort, M., & Van Twist, M. (2008). Facing management choices. An analysis of managerial choices in 18 complex environmental public private partnership projects. International Review of Administrative Science, 74, 251–278. doi:10.1177/0020852308089905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. (2014). Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: The importance of process control and efficacy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 1572–1593. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.820658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., Charles, M. B., & Ryan, N. (2008). Editorial: Managing competing public values in public infrastructure projects. Public Money & Management, 28, 131–134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraak, M. J. (2011). Wateroverlast En De Zorgplicht Van Waterschappen [Flooding and the duty of care of water boards]. Tijdschrift Voor Agrarisch Recht, 3, 90–93. Retrieved from https://denhollander.info/artikel/9067
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 986–1001. 10.1080/08941920802178214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo Stanghellini, P. S., & Collentine, D. (2008). Stakeholder discourse and water management: Implementation of the participatory model CATCH in a northern Italian alpine sub-catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12, 317–331. doi:10.5194/hess-12-317-2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2005). Democracy beyond Parties. Irvine: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Crabbé, A., Alexander, M., Kaufmann, M., Bruzzone, S., Lévy, L., & Lewandowski, J. (2016). Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: Insights from cross-country comparison in Europe. Ecology and Society, 21, 7–20. doi:10.5751/ES-08500-210307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S., & Dicke, W. (2008). Shifts in the public–private divide in flood management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 499–512. doi:10.1080/07900620801921363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 275–293. doi:10.1177/0020852311399851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S. J. S., & Koontz, T. M. (2007). Nonprofit organizations in environmental management: A comparative analysis of government impacts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 441–463. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, M., Tapsell, S., & Twigger-Ross, C. (2011). New social directions in UK flood risk management: Moving towards flood risk citizenship? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4, 288–297. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water: Facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management, 21, 49–62. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., Jeffrey, P., Isendahl, N., & Brugnach, M. (2011). Maturing the new water management paradigm: Progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resources Management, 25, 837–856. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9729-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1976). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petts, J. (2007). Learning about learning: Lessons from public engagement and deliberation on urban river restoration. The Geographical Journal, 173, 300–311. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., Fearman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. R. (1996). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reynaers, A., & De Graaf, G. (2014). Public values in public–private partnerships. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 120–128. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.836665
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30, 92–113. Retrieved form http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10841806.2008.11029617
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman, J., Allan, C., & Finlayson, C. M. (2014). A new paradigm for water? A comparative review of integrated, adaptive and ecosystem-based water management in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30, 377–390. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.907087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83, 573–596. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43, 842–868. doi:10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhuisen, B., & van Eeten, M. (2008). Invisible trade-offs of public values: Inside dutch railways. Public Money & Management, 28, 147–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2006). Value conflict and policy change. Review of Policy Research, 23, 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42, 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2007). Community participation in the real world: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies, 44, 297–317. doi:10.1080/00420980601074987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M., Dewulf, A., & van Lieshout, M. (2010). Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: Comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 15, 29. doi:10.5751/ES-03798-150429 [online]. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art29/.
   Google Scholar
• Thacher, D., & Rein, M. (2004). Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance, 17, 457–486. doi:10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, T., & Levin-Keitel, M. (2016). Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management – A question of roles and power: Lessons from England. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 292–301. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., Driessen, P., Teisman, G., & Van Rijswick, M. (2014). Toward legitimate governance strategies for climate adaptation in the Netherlands: Combining insights from a legal, planning, and network perspective. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 1021–1033. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0448-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Steen, M., Van Twist, M. J. W., & Bressers, D. (2016). The sedimentation of public values: how a variety of governance perspectives guide the practical actions of civil servants. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0734371X16671369
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (2006). More sustainable participation? multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22, 15–35. doi:10.1080/07900620500404992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N. (2015). Adaptation through collaboration: Evaluating the emergence of institutional arrangements for catchment management and governance in England. International Journal of Water Governance, 3, 55–80. doi:10.7564/13-IJWG26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N., Deeming, H., & Treffny, R. (2009). Beyond bureaucracy? Assessing institutional change in the governance of water in England. Water Alternatives, 2, 448–460. Retrieved from http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/volume2/v2issue3/61-a2-3-9
   Google Scholar
• Wegerich, K., Warner, J., & Tortajada, C. (2014). Water sector governance: A return ticket to anarchy. International Journal of Water Governance, 2, 7–20. doi:10.7564/14-IJWG66
   Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., Kempenaar, A., Van Lierop, M., Groot, S., Van der Valk, A., & Van den Brink, A. (2016). The participating government: Shifting boundaries in collaborative spatial planning of urban regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 147–168. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16646770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wet openbaarheid van bestuur [Freedom of Information Act]. (1991, October 31). Retrieved from https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005252/2016-10-01
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2014). Public-private partnerships: Reference guide. version 2.0. Retrieved from https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/library/public-private-partnerships-reference-guide-version-20
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Crawley, C., & Kane, G. (2015). Build level of services and customer value into decision making: Sydney Water’s water main asset management strategy. Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering, 11, 179–190. doi:10.7158/14488388.2015.11464894
   Google Scholar