Estimating willingness to pay for desalinated seawater: the case of Djerba Island, Tunisia

References

• Alcon, F., Martin-Ortega, J., Berbel, J., & de Miguel, M. D. (2012). Environmental benefits of reclaimed water: An economic assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Water Policy, 14, 148–159. doi:10.2166/wp.2011.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amy, G., Ghaffour, N., Li, Z., Francis, L., Linares, R. V., Missimer, T., & Lattemann, S. (2017). Membrane-based seawater desalination: Present and future prospects. Desalination, 401, 16–21. 10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aprahamian, F., Chanel, O., & Luchini, S. (2007). Modeling starting point bias as unobserved heterogeneity in contingent valuation surveys: An application to air pollution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 533–547. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.01020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. P., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4601–4614.
   Google Scholar
• Balana, B., Catacutan, D., & Mäkelä, M. (2013). Assessing the willingness to pay for reliable domestic water supply via catchment management: Results from a contingent valuation survey in Nairobi City, Kenya. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 1511–1531. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.732934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartus, T. (2005). Estimation of marginal effects using margeff. Stata Journal, 5, 309–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., … Swanson, J. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Ltd. doi:10.4337/9781781009727
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. J., Cole, M. A., Georgiou, S., & Hadley, D. J. (2006). Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: A case study considering the benefits of urban river quality improvements. Journal of Environmental Management, 79, 221–231. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2015). Renegotiating urban water. Progress in Planning, 96, 1–28. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Brahim-Neji, H. B., Ruiz-Villaverde, A., & González-Gómez, F. (2014). Decision aid supports for evaluating agricultural water reuse practices in Tunisia: The Cebala perimeter. Agricultural Water Management, 143, 113–121. 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, É. (2002). Djerba, tourisme international et nouvelles logiques migratoires [Djerba, international tourism and new migratory logics]. Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 18, 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgic, A. (2010). Measuring willingness to pay to improve municipal water in southeast Anatolia. Turkey. Water Resources Research, 46, W12545. doi:10.1029/2009WR009010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birol, E., Karousakis, K., & Koundouri, P. (2006). Using choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditita wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics, 60, 145–156. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., Job, F. C., van der Kroon, B., & Johnston, R. (2015). Comparing willingness to pay for improved drinking-water quality using stated preference methods in rural and urban Kenya. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 13, 81–94. doi:10.1007/s40258-014-0137-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T. (2000). Contingent valuation: A user’s guide. Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 1413–1418. doi:10.1021/es990728j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. M., Chambers, P. E., & Whitehead, J. C. (1998). Contingent valuation of quasi-public goods: Validity, reliability, and application to valuing a historic site. Public Finance Review, 26, 137–154. doi:10.1177/109114219802600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Philip, Poe, G. L., & Bateman, I. J. (2004). 9. The structure of motivation for contingent values: A case study of lake water quality improvement. Ecological Economics, 50, 69–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauda, S. A., Yacob, M. R., & Radam, A. (2015). Household’s willingness to pay for heterogeneous attributes of drinking water quality and services improvement: An application of choice experiment. Applied Water Science, 5, 253–259. doi:10.1007/s13201-014-0186-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., & Hurlimann, A. (2010). Desalinated versus recycled water: What does the public think? Sustainability Science and Engineering, 2, 375–388. doi:10.1016/S1871-2711(09)00213-X
   Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., & Schäfer, A. I. (2009). Desalinated versus recycled water: Public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 888–900. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Grün, B. (2011). What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Research, 45, 933–943. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domènech, L., & Saurí, D. (2010). Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: Public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 55, 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, K. S., Russell, S., Spinks, A., & Mankad, A. (2012). Determinants of household water conservation: The role of demographic, infrastructure, behavior, and psychosocial variables. Water Resources Research, 48, 1–12. doi: 10.1029/2012WR012398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, K. S., Gardner, J., Leviston, Z., & Price, J. (2015). Comparing public perceptions of alternative water sources for potable use: The case of rainwater, stormwater, desalinated water, and recycled water. Water Resources Management, 29, 4501–4518. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1072-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammoudi, T. (2011). Emigration, immigration et développement dans l’île de Djerba (Sud-Est tunisien) [Emigration, immigration and development in the island of Djerba (Southeast Tunisia)] (Doctoral dissertation, Paris 5). École doctorale Sciences humaines et sociales: cultures, individus, sociétés (Paris).
   Google Scholar
• García-Rubio, M. A., & Guardiola, J. (2012). Desalination in Spain: A growing alternative for water supply. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28, 171–186. doi:10.1080/07900627.2012.642245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genius, M., Manioudaki, M., Mokas, E., Pantagakis, E., Tampakakis, D., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2005). Estimation of willingness to pay for wastewater treatment. Water Science Technology: Water Supply, 5, 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Genius, M., Hatzaki, E., Kouromichelaki, E. M., Kouvakis, G., Nikiforaki, S., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2008). Evaluating consumers’ willingness to pay for improved potable water quality and quantity. Water Resources Management, 22, 1825–1834. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9255-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, F. L., Tapsuwan, S., Walker, I., & Randrema, E. (2015). Drivers of an urban community’s acceptance of a large desalination scheme for drinking water. Journal of Hydrology, 528, 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Water Intelligence (2014). Sonede revamps desal programme. Global Water Intelligence, 15(4). Retrieved 30 Jul 2017, from https://www.globalwaterintel.com/global-water-intelligence-magazine/15/4/general/sonede-revamps-desal-programme
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., Shore, N., & Train, K. (2006). Water supply security and willingness to pay to avoid drought restrictions. Economic Record, 82, 56–66. doi:10.1111/ecor.2006.82.issue-256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyos, D., & Mariel, P. (2010). Contingent valuation: Past, present and future. Prague Economic Papers, 19, 329–343. doi:10.18267/j.pep.380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlimann, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2016). Public acceptance and perceptions of alternative water sources: A comparative study in nine locations. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32, 650–673. doi:10.1080/07900627.2016.1143350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institut National de la Statistique. (2017). Enquête Nationale sur la Population et l’Emploi. [National Population and Employment Survey]. Tunis: Gouvernement de la Tunisie.
   Google Scholar
• Jianjun, J., Wenyu, W., Ying, F., & Xiaomin, W. (2016). Measuring the willingness to pay for drinking water quality improvements: Results of a contingent valuation survey in Songzi, China. Journal of Water and Health, 14, 504–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, I. C., & Soldatos, P. G. (2008). Water desalination cost literature: Review and assessment. Desalination, 223, 448–456. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, T. J., Ooi, D., Cary, J., Fisher, A., Schibeci, R., Murphy, K., & Donaldson, J. A. (2012). Public perceptions of, and responses to, desalination in Australia: a report on findings. Alfred Deakin Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kontogianni, A., Langford, I. H., Papandreou, A., & Skourtos, M. S. (2003). Social preferences for improving water quality: An economic analysis of benefits from wastewater treatment. Water Resources Management, 17, 317–336. doi:10.1023/A:1025866818391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W.-S., Yoo, S.-H., & Kim, J. (2013). Measuring the economic benefits of the tap water supply service in urban areas: The case of Korea. Water Resources Management, 27, 619–627. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0206-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhjem, H., & Navrud, S. (2011). Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? Ecological Economics, 70, 1628–1637. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, G. (1994). Market models, protest bids, and outliers in contingent valuation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 120, 121–129. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:1(121)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., & Covich, A. (2000). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics, 33, 103–117. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511810176
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, C., & Gupta, G. (2009). Willingness to pay and municipal water pricing in transition: A case study. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 6, 247–260. doi:10.1080/19438150903068224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marella, G., & Raga, R. (2014). Use of the contingent valuation method in the assessment of a landfill mining project. Waste Management, 34, 1199–1205. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, J., Martin, B., & Zadoroznyj, M. (2008). How Australians order acceptance of recycled water National baseline data. Journal of Sociology, 44, 83–99. doi:10.1177/1440783307085844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2006). A Box-Cox double-hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen’s perspective. Ecological Economics, 58, 192–208. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Paz, J. M., & Perni, A. (2011). Environmental cost of groundwater: A contingent valuation approach. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 603–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegaki, A. N., Hanley, N., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2007). The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: A study of consumers’ and farmers’ attitudes. Ecological Economics, 62, 7–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., & Liebe, U. (2006). Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation. Ecological Economics, 57, 583–594. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Nallathiga, R. (2009). An assessment of the willingness to pay for reliable water supply in NCT-Delhi. Water Policy, 11, 320–329. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neifar, B. (2005). Jerba: les mutations récentes d’un système insulaire [Jerba: the recent mutations of an island system]. Revue Mappemonde, 77. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26413495_Jerba_les_mutations_recentes_d%27un_systeme_insulaire
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Water governance in Tunisia: Overcoming the challenges to private sector participation. Paris: OECD Studies on Water. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Tunisia: A reform agenda to support competitiveness and inclusive growth. Paris: Better Policies Series. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polyzou, E., Jones, N., Evangelinos, K. I., & Halvadakis, C. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for drinking water quality improvement and the influence of social capital. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 74–80. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Raje, D. V., Dhobe, P. S., & Deshpande, A. W. (2002). Consumer’s willingness to pay more for municipal supplied water: A case study. Ecological Economics, 42, 391–400. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00054-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Saz-Salazar, S., González-Gómez, F., & Guardiola, J. (2015). Willingness to pay to improve urban water supply: The case of Sucre, Bolivia. Water Policy, 17, 112–125. doi:10.2166/wp.2014.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Saz-Salazar, S., García-Rubio, M. A., González-Gómez, F., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2016). Managing water resources under conditions of scarcity: On consumers’ willingness to pay for improving water supply infrastructure. Water Resources Management, 30, 1723–1738. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1247-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffler, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges for desalination in the 21st century. Desalination, 165, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboubi, K. (2013, July 12). Tunisie: La SONEDE se met au dessalement de l’eau de mer! [Tunisia: SONEDE goes to desalination of sea water!] African Manager. Retrieved from https://africanmanager.com/tunisie-la-sonede-se-met-au-dessalement-de-l-eau-de-mer/
   Google Scholar
• Tapsuwan, S., Brennan, D., Ingram, G., & Burton, M. (2007). Household willingness to pay to avoid drought water restrictions: A case study of Perth, Western Australia. In Proceedings of the 36th Australian Conference of Economists (pp. 24–26). Hobart: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L., Wynveen, B. J., Fox, W. E., & Burnett, D. B. (2009). Public perception of desalinated water from oil and gas field operations: Data from Texas. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 674–685. doi:10.1080/08941920802039804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limits dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24–36. doi:10.2307/1907382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touzi, S., Barraqué, B., & Treyer, S. (2010). Le service de l’eau potable en Tunisie [The service of drinking water in Tunisia]. Revue Tiers Monde, 203, 61–80. doi:10.3917/rtm.203.0061
   Google Scholar
• Tziakis, I., Pachiadakis, I., Moraitakis, M., Xideas, K., Theologis, G., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2009). Valuing benefits from wastewater treatment and reuse using contingent valuation methodology. Desalination, 237, 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Um, M. J., Kwak, S. J., & Kim, T. Y. (2002). Estimating willingness to pay for improved drinking water quality using averting behavior method with perception measure. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 285–300. doi:10.1023/A:1014537330423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, W. F., Mozumder, P., Hernández-Arce, J., & Berrens, R. P. (2009). Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3391–3400. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam, L. (2006). Factors influencing household willingness to pay (WTP) for drinking water in peri-urban areas: A case study in the Indian context. Water Policy, 8, 461–473. doi:10.2166/wp.2006.055
   Google Scholar
• Vossler, C. A., & Watson, S. B. (2013). Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 137–147. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Xie, J., & Li, H. (2010). Water pricing with household surveys: A study of acceptability and willingness to pay in Chongqing, China. China Economic Review, 21, 136–149. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, R. M., Stewart, R. A., Panuwatwanich, K., Williams, P. R., & Hollingsworth, A. L. (2011). Quantifying the influence of environmental and water conservation attitudes on household end use water consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1996–2009. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2009). Republic of Tunisia. Water and sanitation strategy. Document of the World Bank. Report No. 44744-TN. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2014). TdR: Étude pour l’amélioration de l’équilibre financier de la SONEDE [TdR: Study to improve the financial balance of SONEDE]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. H., Kwak, S. J., & Kim, T. Y. (2000). Dealing with zero response data from contingent valuation surveys: application of least absolute deviations estimator. Applied Economics Letters, 7, 181–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar