State-of-the-art review of transboundary water governance in the Euphrates–Tigris river basin

References

• Allan, J. A. (1990). Agricultural sector in Iraq. London: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Altinbilek, D. H. (1997). Water and land resources development in Southeastern Turkey. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(3), 311–332. doi:10.1080/07900629749719
   Google Scholar
• Altinbilek, D. H. (2004). Development and management of the Euphrates–Tigris basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 20(1), 15–33. doi:10.1080/07900620310001635584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altinbilek, D., & Tortajada, C. (2012). The Atatürk Dam in the context of the Southeastern Anatolia (GAP) project. In C. Tortajada, D. Altinbilek, & A. Biswas (Eds.), Impacts of large dams: A global assessment (pp. 171–199). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-23571-9
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. W. (1986). Water geopolitics in the Middle East: Key countries. Conference on U.S. Foreign policy on water resources in the Middle East: Instrument for peace and development, Washington, DC: CSIS.
   Google Scholar
• Bakour, Y. (1992). Planning and management of water resources in Syria. In G. Le Moigne, S. Barghouti, G. Feder, L. Garbus, & M. Xie (Eds.), Country experiences with water resources management, economic, institutional, technological and environmental issues (pp. 151–155). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, P. (1992). Water: A resource under pressure. In G. Nonneman (Ed.), The Middle East and Europe: An integrated communities approach (pp. 183–188). London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, P. (1998). Restructuring of water usage in the Tigris-Euphrates basin: The impact of modern water management policies. In J. Albert, M. Bernhardsson, & R. Kenna (Eds.), Transformations of Middle Eastern natural environments: Legacies and lessons, bulletin series 103 (pp. 168–186). Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Belül, M. L. (1996). Hydropolitics of the Euphrates-Tigris basin ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Beschorner, N. (1992). Water and instability in the Middle East. Adelphi Paper, 273, 1–82. doi:10.1080/05679329208449127
   Google Scholar
• Bilen, O. (1994). Prospects for technical cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris basin. In A. K. Biswas (Ed.), International waters of the Middle East - from Euphrates-Tigris to Nile (pp. 95–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, D., & Sen, O. L. (2013). Climate change impacts in the Euphrates-Tigris basin based on different model and scenario simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulloch, J., & Darwish, A. (1993). Water wars: Coming conflicts in the Middle East. London: Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, E. (2005). Equitable and reasonable use of water within the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, G. J. (1989). The development of the law of international water resources and the work of the international law commission. Water International, 14(4), 167–171. doi:10.1080/02508068908692100
   Google Scholar
• Caponera, D. (1985). Patterns of cooperation in international water law: Principles and institutions. Natural Resources Journal, 25(3), 563–587. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24883347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascão, A. E. (2009). Changing power relations in the Nile river basin: Unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Alternatives, 2(2), 245–268. Retrieved from http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/6422/changing%20power%20relations.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Cascão, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010). Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. In A. Earle, J. Anders, & J. Öjendal (Eds.), Transboundary water management principles and practice (pp. 27–42). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, E. W., & Saliem, K. A. (Eds.). (2012). Managing salinity in Iraq’s agriculture: Current state, causes and impacts ( Iraq Salinity Assessment: Report 1). Retrieved from file:///Users/aysegulkibaroglu/Downloads/Iraq-Salinity-Assessment-CurrentState-causesandimpact%20(3).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conker, A. (2014). An enhanced notion of power for inter-state and transnational hydropolitics: An analysis of Turkish-Syrian water relations and the Ilisu Dam ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of International Development, University of East Anglia. Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/48763/1/Ahmet_Conker’s_thesis-Final_Submission_10.06.2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, J. (1984). The war over water. Foreign Policy, 54(54), 3–26. doi:10.2307/1148352
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, A. (1990, February 7). Now a little steam later may be a water war. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/07/world/cairo-journal-now-a-little-steam-later-maybe-a-water-war.html?mcubz=2
   Google Scholar
• Cullmann, J. (2013). Hydrology. In A. Kibaroglu, A. Kirschner, S. Mehring, & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), Water law and cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris region (pp. 183–189). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Daoudy, M. (2008). Hydro-hegemony and international water law: Laying claims to water rights. Water Policy, 10(S2), 89–102. doi:10.2166/wp.2008.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoudy, M. (2009). Asymmetric power: Negotiating water in the Euphrates and Tigris. International Negotiation, 14(2), 361–391. doi:10.1163/157180609X432860
   Google Scholar
• Dellapenna, J. W. (1996). The two rivers and the lands between: Mesopotamia and the international law of transboundary waters. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, 10(2). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1195&context=jpl
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowsky, I. (2009). Revisiting the potential for benefit sharing in the management of transboundary rivers. Water Policy, 11(2), 125–149. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, M., & Carkoglu, A. (2001). Domestic concerns and the water conflict over the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. Middle Eastern Studies, 37(1), 41–71. doi:10.1080/714004364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elver, H. (2002). Peaceful uses of international rivers: The Euphrates and Tigris dispute. Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• ETIC. (2017). Retrieved from https://euphratestigrisinitiativeforcooperation.wordpress.com/
   Google Scholar
• Final communiqués of the 16 Joint Technical Committee meetings (1980-1993), on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• GAP Administration. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.gap.gov.tr/gap-ta-son-durum-sayfa-32.html
   Google Scholar
• Garretson, A. H., Hayton, R. D., & Olmstead, C. (Eds.). (1967). The law of international drainage basin. Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Water Hub. (2016). The protection of water during and after armed conflicts ( Think-Tank Roundtable Report). Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.genevawaterhub.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/gwh_ghlp_roundtable_armedconflicts_rev_march2017nomail_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, M., Wolf, A., & Giordano, M. (2008). Institutions for transboundary basins. In C. Sadoff, T. Greiber, M. Smith, & G. Bergkamp (Eds.), Share: Managing water across boundaries (pp. 65–78). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gowers, A. (1989, May). Water war in the Middle East. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Gurun, K. (1994). Akintiya Kürek Cekmek: Bir Büyükelcinin Aniları. Istanbul: Milliyet Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. (2002). Water and conflict geographies of the Southeastern Anatolia project. Society & Natural Resources, 15(8), 743–759. doi:10.1080/08941920290069326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., & Alatout, S. (2010). Negotiating scales, forging states: Comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River basins. Political Geography, 29(3), 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, A. S. (2014). The Islamic State: From al-Qaeda affiliate to Caliphate. Middle East Policy, 21(4), 69–83. doi:10.1111/mepo.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillel, D. (1995). Rivers of Eden: The struggle for water and the quest for peace in the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntjens, P., Yasuda, Y., Swain, A., De Man, R., Magsig, B., & Islam, S. (2016). The multi-track water diplomacy framework: A legal and political economy analysis for advancing cooperation over shared waters (1st ed.). The Hague: The Hague Institute for Global Justice.
   Google Scholar
• ILA Helsinki Rules. (1966). Helsinki rules on the uses of the waters of international rivers. London: International Law Association. Retrieved from http://www.thehinducentre.com/multimedia/archive/03021/The_Helsinki_Rules_3021443a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jagerskög, A. (2003). Why states cooperate over shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan River basin. Linkoping: Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Kavvas, M. L., Chen, Z. Q., Anderson, M. L., Ohara, N., Yoon, J. Y., & Xiang, F. (2011). A study of water balances over the Tigris-Euphrates watershed. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36(5–6), 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, I. (1998). The Euphrates-Tigris basin: An overview and opportunities for cooperation under international law. University of Arizona Arid Lands Newsletter, 44. Retrieved from https://cals.arizona.edu/OALS/ALN/aln44/kaya.html
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A. (2002). Building a regime for the waters of the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A. (2008). The role of epistemic communities in offering new cooperation frameworks in the Euphrates-Tigris rivers system. Journal of International Affairs, 61(2), 183–198. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24358118
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A. (2014). An analysis of Turkey’s water diplomacy and its evolving position vis-à-vis international water law. Water International, 40(1), 153–167. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.978971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A., & Gursoy, S. I. (2015). Water–energy–food nexus in a transboundary context: The Euphrates-Tigris river basin as a case study. Water International, 40(5-6), 824–838. doi:10.1080/02508060.2015.1078577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A., & Scheumann, W. (2013). Evolution of transboundary politics in the Euphrates-Tigris river system: New perspectives and political challenges. Global Governance, 19, 279–307. doi:10.5555/1075-2846-19.2.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A., & Unver, I. O. (2000). An institutional framework for facilitating cooperation. International Negotiation, 5(2), 311–330. doi:10.1163/15718060020848785
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, A., Klaphake, A., Kramer, A., Scheumann, W., & Carius, A. (2005). Cooperation on Turkey’s transboundary waters ( F+E Project No. 903 19 226). Berlin: German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, A., & Tiroch, K. (2012). The waters of the Euphrates and Tigris: An international law perspective. In A. von Bogdandy & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), Max Planck UNYB 16 (pp. 329–394). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kliot, N. (1994). Water resources and conflict in the Middle East. NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kolars, J. F. (1994). Problems of international river management: The case of the Euphrates. In A. K. Biswas (Ed.), International waters of the Middle East - from Euphrates-Tigris to Nile (pp. 44–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolars, J. F., & Mitchell, W. A. (1991). The Euphrates river and the Southeast Anatolia development project. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law No. 14 of 1990, Ratifying the joint minutes concerning the provisional division of the waters of the Euphrates River. Retrieved from https://www.informea.org/en/legislation/law-no-14-1990-ratifying-joint-minutes-concerning-provisional-division-waters-euphrates
   Google Scholar
• LeMarquand, D. G. (1977). International rivers: The politics of cooperation. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia and the Waterloo Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, F. M., & Erickson, J. E. (1999). The Euphrates triangle: Security implications of the Southeastern Anatolia project. Washington, DC: National Defence University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, M. (1993). Water and power. Oxford: OUP.10.1017/CBO9780511598708
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. C. (1991). The evolution of the law of transboundary rivers. The conference on transboundary waters in the Middle East: Prospects for regional cooperation, Ankara: Bilkent University.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. C. (2007). The law of international watercourses (2nd ed.). NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, K. (1991). The South-East Anatolia Project (GAP) and its effect on water supply and management in Iraq. London: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Meliczek, H. (1987). Land settlement in the Euphrates basin of Syria, land reform: Land settlement and cooperatives. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Memorandum of Understanding Between the Ministry of the Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Turkey and the Ministry of Water Resources of the Republic of Iraq on Water. (2009a). on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic for the Construction of a Joint Dam on the Orontes River Under the Name ‘Friendship Dam’. (2009b). on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic in the Field of Efficient Utilization of Water Resources and Coping with Drought; Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic in the Field of Remediation of Water Quality. (2009c). on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Mirumachi, N., & Allan, J. A. (2007). Revisiting transboundary water governance: Power, conflict, cooperation and the political economy. CAIWA conference paper. Retrieved from http://www.newater.uni-osnabrueck.de/caiwa/data/papers%20session/F3/CAIWA-FullPaper-MirumachiAllan25Oct07submitted2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C. (1990, March 10). Middle East faces major water woes. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Naff, T., & Matson, R. C. (1984). Water in the Middle East: Conflict or cooperation? Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nippon Koei & Yüksel Proje. (1989). Vols. I-IV, Southeastern Anatolia project master plan study. Tokyo and Ankara: State Planning Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Protocol on Matters Pertaining to Economic Cooperation Between the Republic of Turkey and the Syrian Arab Republic, United Nations Treaty Series 87/12171, 17/7/1987.
   Google Scholar
• Rende, M. (2002). The looming global water shortage and Turkey’s water management in a transboundary context. Paper presented at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 48th Annual Session, Istanbul, November 16–19 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A., & Waterbury, J. (1990). A political economy of the Middle East. Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Hall, A. (2003). Effective water governance ( TEC Background Paper No. 7). Stockholm: Global Water Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Lydon, P. (Eds.). (1994). Water in the Arab world: Perspectives and prognoses. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saatci, A. (2015). Iraq-Turkey track. Blue peace in the Middle East high level forum, University of Geneva, October 8-9 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoff, C., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4(5), 389–403. doi:10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00035-1
   Google Scholar
• Sadoff, C., & Grey, D. (2005). Cooperation on international rivers: Continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International, 30(4), 420–427. doi:10.1080/02508060508691886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman, S. M. A. (2003). From Marrakech through The Hague to Kyoto: Has the global debate on water reached a dead end? Part one and two. Water International, 28(4), 491–500, 501-511. doi 10.1080/02508060308691726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayan, R. C., & Kibaroglu, A. (2016). Understanding water-society nexus: Insights from Turkey's small-scale hydropower policy. Water Policy, 18(5), 1286–1301. doi:10.2166/wp.2016.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheumann, W. (1998). Conflicts on the Euphrates: An analysis of water and non-water issues. In W. Scheumann & M. Schiffler (Eds.), Water in the Middle East (pp. 31–45). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-03731-7
   Google Scholar
• Scheumann, W. (2003). The Euphrates issue in Turkish-Syrian relations. In G. H. Brauch, P. H. Liotta, S. Marquina, P. F. Rogers, & M. El-Sayed Selim (Eds.), Security and environment in the mediterranean: Conceptualising security and environmental conflicts (pp. 745–760). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, J. R. (1991). Water wars. Foreign Policy, 82(82), 17–36. Retrieved from http://www.ciesin.org/docs/006-304/006-304.html10.2307/1148639
   Google Scholar
• Starr, J. R., & Stoll, D. C. (1987). US Foreign policy on water resources in the Middle East. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• SUENa. (2016). Retrieved from https://suen.gov.tr/en/2016/08/19/turkiye-ile-irak-arasinda-teknik-uzmanlar-toplantisi/
   Google Scholar
• SUENb. (2017). Retrieved from https://suen.gov.tr/en/2017/03/31/irakli-uzmanlar-su-ve-atiksu-egitimi-icin-suende/
   Google Scholar
• Suhardiman, D., & Giordano, M. (2012). Process-focused analysis in transboundary water governance research. International Environmental Agreements-Politics, Law and Economics, 12(3), 299–308. doi:10.1007/s10784-012-9176-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice, V. L. (2016). Water management and water challenges in Iraq. Retrieved from https://water.fanack.com/iraq/water-management-and-water-challenges-in-iraq/
   Google Scholar
• Tignino, M. (2010). Water, international peace and security. International Review of the Red Cross, 92(879), 647–674. doi:10.1017/S181638311000055X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigrek, S., & Kibaroglu, A. (2011). Strategic role of water resources for Turkey. In A. Kibaroglu, W. Scheumann, & Annika Kramer (Eds.), Turkey’s water policy (pp. 27–42). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tortajada, C. (2000). Evaluation of actual impacts of the Atatürk dam. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 16(4), 453–464. doi:10.1080/07900620020003638
   Google Scholar
• Trondalen, J. M. (2008). Water and peace for the people – Proposed solutions to water disputes in the Middle East. Paris: UNESCO International Hydrological Programme (IHP).
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (1996). Water issues between Turkey, Syria and Iraq. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs. Retrieved from http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/WATER-ISSUES-BETWEEN-TURKEY-SYRIA-AND-IRAQ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN Watercourses Convention. (1997). Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. Retrieved from http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_3_1997.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2004). Water governance for poverty reduction. Key issues and the UNDP response to the Millennium Development Goals. Water Governance Programme Bureau for Development Policy. New York, NY: UNDP. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/aplaws/publication/en/publications/environment-energy/www-ee-library/water-governance/water-governance-for-poverty-reduction/UNDP_Water%20Governance%20for%20Poverty%20Reduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN-ESCWA & BGR. (2013). Inventory of shared water resources in Western Asia. 10th session of the committee on water resources, ESCWA, Beirut, March 21 2013. Retrieved from https://waterinventory.org/
   Google Scholar
• Unver, I. H. O. (1997). Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP). International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 453–484. doi:10.1080/07900629749575
   Google Scholar
• USAID. (2010). Advancing the blue revolution initiative ( Final Report: May 2007-November 2010). Retrieved from http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pdact101.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Venturia, L. A., & Capozzolib, C. R. (2017). Changes in the water quantity and quality of the Euphrates river are associated with natural aspects of the landscape. Water Policy, 19(2), 233–256. doi:10.2166/wp.2017.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwanath, A. (2015). The water wars waged by the Islamic state. Retrieved from https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/water-wars-waged-islamic-state
   Google Scholar
• Von Lossow, T. (2016). Water as Weapon: IS on the Euphrates and Tigris. German Institute for International and Security Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2016C03_lsw.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wakil, M. (1993). Analysis of future water needs for different sectors in Syria. Water International, 18(1), 18–22. doi:10.1080/02508069308686144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271–288. Retrieved from http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/volume1/v1issue2/32-a1-2-6/file
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (2012). The struggle over Turkey’s Ilısu Dam: Domestic and international security linkages. International Environmental Agreements-Politics, Law and Economics, 12(3), 231–250. doi:10.1007/s10784-012-9178-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waslekar, S. (2017). Wars will not be fought over water – our thirst could pave the way to peace. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/19/water-wars-infrastructure-isis-peace
   Google Scholar
• Waterbury, J. (1999). Dynamics of basin-wide cooperation in the utilisation of the Euphrates. Paper presented at the conference on the economic development of Syria; problems, progress, and prospects, Damascus, Syria.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T. (1999). Criteria for equitable allocations: The heart of international water conflict. Natural Resources Forum, 23(1), 3–30. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.1999.tb00235.x
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T. (Ed.). (2002). Conflict prevention and resolution in water systems. The Management of Water series, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T., Kramer, A., Carius, A., & Dabelko, G. D. (2005). Managing water conflict and cooperation, state of the world 2005: Redefining global security. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P. (2013). Sovereignty revisited –examining the rules of international law that govern transboundary water resources with a focus on upstream/downstream state practice– possible lessons learned for the Euphrates-Tigris. In A. Kibaroglu, A. Kirschner, S. Mehring, & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), Water law and cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris region (pp. 373–401). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004258358
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., Kibaroglu, A., & Ahmad, Y. (2014). Supporting coordination and cooperation in the Euphrates and Tigris region, Political Economy and Governance Analysis (PEGA) project. Stockholm: Stockholm International Water Institute, on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin, E., & Tigrek, S. (2015). Hydropower production without sacrificing environment: A case study of Ilisu Dam and Hasankeyf. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(2), 1–20. doi:10.1080/07900627.2015.1031210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucel, I., Guventurk, A., & Sen, O. L. (2014). Climate change impacts of snowmelt runoff for mountainous transboundary basins in eastern Turkey. International Journal of Climatology, 35(2), 215–228. doi:10.1002/joc.3974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements- Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 297–316. doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony a framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. doi:10.2166/wp.2006.054
   Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., Cascão, A. E., Warner, J., Mirumachi, N., Matthews, N., Menga, F., & Farnum, R. (2017). Transboundary water interaction III: Contest and compliance. International Environmental Agreements-Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 271–294. doi:10.1007/s10784-016-9325-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar