Is three a crowd? River basin institutions and the governance of the Mekong River

References

• Bakker, K. (1999). The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography, 18(2), 209–232. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(98)00085-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’ to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biba, S. (2018). China’s ‘old’ and ‘new’ Mekong River politics: The Lancang-Mekong cooperation from a comparative benefit-sharing perspective. Water International, 43(5), 622–641. doi:10.1080/02508060.2018.1474610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CMoFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs). (2015a, November 17). Wang Yi elaborates on five priorities and three important supports in Lancang-Mekong River cooperation. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• CMoFA. (2015b, November 12). First foreign ministers’ meeting on Lancang-Mekong River cooperation held Lancang-Mekong River cooperation mechanism officially. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• CMoFA. (2016a, March 17). Five features of Lancang-Mekong River cooperation. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• CMoFA. (2016b, September 11). Deepen production capacity cooperation, achieve common development: Speech of vice foreign minister Liu Zhenmin at the 2nd session of the 21st century Maritime Silk Road and Promoting International Production Capacity and Equipment Manufacturing Cooperation Forum, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• CMoFA. (2016c, September 8). Li Keqiang attends 19th China-ASEAN summit, emphasizing to build up confidence, and forge ahead to push China-ASEAN relations for more comprehensive and in-depth development. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• CMoFA. (2017, March 10). Foreign ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang’s regular press conference on March 10, 2017. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (2011). Promoting and contesting hydropower development: Actors and narratives in the Lower Mekong Basin’s hydropolitical constellation (PhD dissertation). University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, J. G. (1993). The nature of co-operation. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crow-Miller, B. (2015). Discourse of deflection: The politics of framing China’s South-North Water Transfer Project. Water Alternatives, 8(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano, L., Duncan, J., Dinar, S., Stahl, K., Strzepek, K. M., & Wolf, A. T. (2012). Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. Journal of Peace Research, 49(1), 193–209. doi:10.1177/0022343311427416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore, J., & Lazarus, K. (2009). De-marginalising the Mekong River Commission. In F. Molle, T. Foran, & M. Kakonen (Eds.), Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance (pp. 357–382). London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, A., Cascão, A. E., Hansson, S., Jӓgerskog, A., Swain, A., & Ӧjendal, J. (2015). Transboundary water management and the climate change debate. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). (2011). Mekong Basin. Rome: Aquastat.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Translated from the French by A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K. (2004). Strengthening river basin institutions: The global environment facility and the Danube River Basin. Water Resources Research, 40(8). doi:10.1029/2003WR002936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GMS (Greater Mekong Subregion). (2015). GMS countries renew efforts to boost investments in natural assets. Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• GMS. (2017). Mekong-ROK Cooperation Fund. GMS logistics database [online]. Retrieved from http://www.logisticsgms.com/mekong-korea.php
   Google Scholar
• GMS. (2019). The Greater Mekong Subregion Retrieved from https://greatermekong.org/about
   Google Scholar
• Grumbine, R. E. (2018). Using transboundary environmental security to manage the Mekong River: China and South-East Asian countries. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(5), 792–811. doi:10.1080/07900627.2017.1348938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangsheng, L. (2016). China seeks to improve Mekong sub-regional cooperation: Causes and policies (Policy report). Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Haefner, A. (2013). Regional environmental security: Cooperation and challenges in the Mekong subregion. Global Change Peace and Security, 25(1), 27–41. doi:10.1080/14781158.2013.758099
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, S., Hellberg, S., & Ӧjendal, J. (Eds.). (2012). Politics and development in a transboundary watershed: The case of the Lower Mekong Basin (pp. 1–19). Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. (2016). The shifting regional geopolitics of Mekong dams. Political Geography, 51, 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S., & Pitakdumrongkit, K. (2019, January 30). Can ASEAN play a greater role in the Mekong Subregion? The Diplomat.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis: As theory and method. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jӓgerskog, A. (2002). The sanctioned discourse: A crucial factor for understanding water policy in the Jordan River Basin (Occasional Paper No.41). Department for Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kittikhouna, A., & Staublib, D. M. (2018). Water diplomacy and conflict management in the Mekong: From rivalries to cooperation. Journal of Hydrology, 567, 644–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffey, M., & Weldes, J. (2004). Methodological reflections on discourse analysis. Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2013, June 26–28). Actor-centred approaches of policy change discursive agency: Towards an actor-centred analysis of political discourses. Paper prepared for the 1st International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP 2013), France.
   Google Scholar
• LMC (Lancang Mekong Cooperation Mechanism). (2015, November 12). Joint press communiqué of the first Lancang-Mekong Cooperation foreign ministers’ meeting. Yunnan, China: LMC.
   Google Scholar
• LMC. (2016a, December 23). Joint press communiqué of the second Lancang Mekong Cooperation foreign ministers’ meeting, Siem Reap, Cambodia. PRC: Lancang Mekong Cooperation Mechanism.
   Google Scholar
• LMC. (2016b, March 23). Sanya declaration of the first Lancang Mekong Cooperation leaders’ meeting: For a community of shared future of peace and prosperity among Lancang Mekong countries. Sanya, PRC: Lancang Mekong Cooperation Mechanism.
   Google Scholar
• LMC. (2017). A brief introduction of Lancang Mekong Cooperation. Retrieved from http://www.lmcchina.org/eng/gylmhz_1/jj/t1519110.htm
   Google Scholar
• LMI (Lower Mekong Initative). (n.d.). Lower Mekong initiative Retrieved from https://www.lowermekong.org/
   Google Scholar
• LMoFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs). (2014) Govt reiterates stance on Don Sahong Dam project. Vientiane, Laos People’s Democratic Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, W. (2004). Content analysis and its place in the (methodological) scheme of things. Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, D. (2012). The dragon upstream: China’s role in the Lancang-Mekong development. In J. Ӧjendal, S. Hansson, & S. Hellberg (Eds.), Politics and development in a transboundary watershed: The case of the Lower Mekong Basin (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MEA (Minister of External Affairs). (2017, March). About Mekong-Ganga cooperation. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• MFA (Minister of Foreign Affairs). (2014). The Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy (ACMECS). Bangkok: Kingdom of Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, C., & Allouche, J. (2016). Watershed or powershed? Critical hydropolitics, China and the ‘Lancang-Mekong cooperation framework’. International Spectator, 51(3), 100–117. doi:10.1080/03932729.2016.1209385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirumachi, N. (2015). Transboundary water politics in the developing world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. M., & Zawahri, N. A. (2015). The effectiveness of treaty design in addressing water disputes. Journal of Peace Research, 52(2), 187–200. doi:10.1177/0022343314559623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoEM (Ministry of Energy and Mines). (2015). Don Sahong made simple: Questions and answers about the Don Sahong hydropower project. Vientiane, Laos People’s Democratic Republic.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA (Minister of Foreign Affairs). (2019). Japan-Mekong cooperation. Tokyo: Government of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• MoFAIC (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Communication). (2016, December 23). Joint press communiqué of the second Lancang-Mekong Cooperation (LMC) foreign ministers’ meeting, Siem Reap, Kingdom of Cambodia. Phnom Penh: MoFAIC.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, F. (2008). Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: Insights from the water sector. Water Alternatives, 1(1), 131–156.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, F., Foran, T., & Floch, P. (2009). Introduction: Changing waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Historical background and context. In F. Molle, T. Foran, & M. Kakonen (Eds.), Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance (pp. 1–19). London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• MRC (Mekong River Commission). (1995, April 5). Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin. Vientiane, Laos: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC (Mekong River Commission). (2005). Mekong Basin. Vientiane, Laos: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2011). Integrated water resources management-based basin development strategy. Vientiane, Laos: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016a). Integrated water resources management-based basin development strategy 2016–2020 for the Lower Mekong Basin. Vientiane, Laos: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016b). Lancang-Mekong Cooperation: MRC welcomes the new initiative for regional cooperation by six countries in the Mekong River Basin. Vientiane, Laos: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016c, August 31). Joint development partner statement on the occasion of the informal development partners meeting, Phnom Penh. Cambodia: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016d, July 27–28). Summary of minutes of the forty-fourth meeting of the MRC joint committee, Mekong River Commission. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016e, November 23). Summary of minutes of the twenty-third meeting of the MRC council (session 1). Pakse, Laos: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016f, January 13). Joint development partner statement, 22nd meeting of the MRC council, Phnom Penh. Cambodia: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016g, January 13). Statement by H.E. Mme. Monemany Nhoybouakong, 22nd meeting of the MRC council, Phnom Penh. Cambodia: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (2016h, January 13). Statement by H.E. Mr. Chu Pham Ngoc Hein. 22nd meeting of the MRC council, Phnom Penh. Cambodia: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MRC. (n.d.). Mekong River Commission for sustainable development Retrieved from http://www.mrcmekong.org/about-mrc/
   Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ӧjendal, J., & Jenson, K. M. (2012). Politics and development of the Mekong River Basin: Transboundary dilemmas and participatory ambitions. In J. Ӧjendal, S. Hansson, & S. Hellberg (Eds.), Politics and development in a transboundary watershed: The case of the Lower Mekong Basin (pp. 195–206). Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2003). Discourse or institution? Institutional theory and the challenge of critical discourse analysis. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 220–231). Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Public Relations Department. (2016a, November 15). Royal initiatives of King Bhumibol guiding water resource management. Bangkok: Kingdom of Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Public Relations Department. (2016b, March 25). Thailand proposes early harvest projects under the Mekong-Lancang cooperation framework Kingdom of Thailand. Bangkok, Kingdom of Thailand: Public Relations Dept.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen, T. A., Koponen, J., Lauri, H., & Kummu, M. (2012). Downstream hydrological impacts of hydropower development in the Upper Mekong Basin. Water Resources Management, 26, 3495–3513. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räsänen, T. A., Someth, P., Lauri, H., Koponen, J., Sarkkula, J., & Kummu, M. (2017). Observed river discharge changes due to hydropower operations in the Upper Mekong Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 545, 28–41. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4, 389–403. doi:10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00035-1
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2006, August 31–September 3). Give peace a chance: Reconciling four (not three) ‘new institutionalisms’. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A. M. (2011). International relations, principle theories. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (p. 129). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, M., Wester, P., & Molle, F. (2005). Managing river basins: An institutional perspective. In M. Svendsen (Ed.), Irrigation and river basin management: Options for governance and institutions. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, A. (2012). Politics or development: Sharing of international rivers in the south. In J. Ӧjendal, S. Hansson, & S. Hellberg (Eds.), Politics and development in a transboundary watershed: The case of the Lower Mekong Basin (pp. 19–36). Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, F., Siciliano, G., & Nordensvard, J. (2018). China’s dam-builders: Their role in transboundary river management in South-East Asia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(5), 1–25. doi:10.1080/07900627.2017.1329138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. (2019). Emerging costs of China’s belt and road strategy for transboundary water in South and Southeast Asia. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 3(2), 81–92. doi:10.1007/s42108-019-00017-9
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60. doi:10.2166/wp.2003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Yoffe, S., Fiske, G., Giordano, M., Larson, K., Stahl, K., & Wolf, A. T. (2003). Geography of international water conflict and cooperation: Data sets and applications. Water Resources Research, 40(5), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: The influence of ‘soft’ power. International Environmental Agreements, 11(2), 159–178. doi:10.1007/s10784-010-9134-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. doi:10.2166/wp.2006.054
   Google Scholar