The End of Party Democracy as We Know It? A Tribute to Peter Mair

References

• Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2010) The Lega Nord back in government, West European Politics, 33(6), pp. 1,318–1,340. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2010.508911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andeweg, R. B. (2003) Beyond representativeness? Trends in political representation, European Review, 11(2), pp. 147–161. doi: 10.1017/S1062798703000164
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, R. B. (2012) Peter Mair en de vertegenwoordigende democratie, Res Publica, 54(3), pp. 361–369.
   Google Scholar
• Avnon, D. (1995) Parties laws in democratic systems of government, Journal of Legislative Studies, 1(2), pp. 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. & Mair, P. (2001) Challenges to contemporary political parties, in: L. Diamond & R. Gunther (Eds) Political Parties and Democracy, pp. 327–343 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van (2003) Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van (2004) Political parties as public utilities, Party Politics, 10(6), pp. 701–722. doi: 10.1177/1354068804046914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van (2012) Constitutionalizing party democracy: the constitutive codification of political parties in post-war Europe, British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), pp. 187–212. doi: 10.1017/S0007123411000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van & Kopecký, P. (2007) The state and the parties: public funding, public regulation and rent-seeking in contemporary democracies, Party Politics, 13(2), pp. 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van & Kopecký, P. (2014) The cartel party and the state: party–state linkage in European democracies, Party Politics, 20(2), pp. 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van, Mair, P. & Poguntke, T. (2012) Going, going … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe, European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), pp. 24–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van, & Rashkova, E. R. (2012) Deterring new party entry? The impact of state regulation on the permeability of party systems, Party Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff, C. S. (2006) Political Competition and Contestability: A Study of Barriers to Entry in 21 Democracies, PhD Dissertation, European University Institute, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. (2011) The influence of political parties on policy coordination, Governance, 24(3), pp. 469–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casal Bértoa, F. & Spirova, M. (2013) Get a Subsidy or Perish! Public Funding and Party Survival in Eastern Europe, Working Paper Series on the Legal Regulation of Political Parties, No. 29.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M. & McAllister, I. (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. & Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds) (2000) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Detterbeck, K. (2005) Cartel parties in Western Europe?, Party Politics, 11(2), pp. 173–191. doi: 10.1177/1354068805049738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activities in the Modern State (London: Methuen).
   Google Scholar
• Everson, M. (2000) Beyond the Bundesverfassungsgericht: on the necessary cunning of constitutional reasoning, in: Z. Bankowski & A. Scott (Eds) The European Union and its Order: The Legal Theory of European Integration, pp. 99–112 (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. (2012) Representative democracy takes a 'deliberative turn'. Paper presented at the conference Responsive or Responsible? Parties, Democracy, and Global Markets, European University Institute, Florence, 26–28 September.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S. & Saunders, K. L. (2012) How the Tea Party and Occupy contribute to party polarization: a social identity perspective. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, 12–15 April.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmann, O. (2011) Political Parties and Electoral Strategy: The Development of Party Organization in East Asia (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R. & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy: American’s Beliefs about How Government Should Work (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).
   Google Scholar
• Issacharoff, S. (2007) Fragile democracies, Harvard Law Review, 120, pp. 1405–1467.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. (2002) The internal life of parties, in: K. R. Luther & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds) Political Challenges in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges, pp. 87–118 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (Eds) (1992) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960–1990 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (1993) The evolution of party organizations in Europe: the three faces of party organization, in: W. Crotty (Ed.) Political Parties in a Changing Age, special issue of the American Review of Politics, 14, pp. 593–617.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party, Party Politics, 1(1), pp. 5–28. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (2002) The ascendancy of the party in public office: party organizational change in 20th-century democracies, in: R. Gunther, J. R. Montero & J. J. Linz (Eds) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, pp. 113–135 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (2009) The cartel party thesis: a restatement, Perspectives on Politics, 7(4), pp. 753–766.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, O. (1966) The transformation of West European party systems, in: J. LaPalombara & M. Weiner (Eds) Political Parties and Political Development, pp. 177–200 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Koole, R. (1996) Cadre, catch-all or cartel? A comment on the notion of the cartel party, Party Politics, 2(4), pp. 507–523. doi: 10.1177/1354068896002004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, K. & Merkel, P. H. (Eds) (1988) When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Leibholz, G. (1958) Strukturprobleme der Modernen Demokratie (Karlsruhe: Müller).
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1975) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (1983) Adaptation and control: towards and understanding of party and party system change, in: H. Daalder & P. Mair (Eds) Western European Party Systems: Continuity & Change, pp. 405–429 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (1989) Continuity, change, and the vulnerability of party, West European Politics, 12(4), pp. 169–187. doi: 10.1080/01402388908424770
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (Ed.) (1990) The West European Party System (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (1995) Political parties, popular legitimacy and public privilege, West European Politics, 18(3), pp. 40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2006) Ruling the void: the hollowing of western democracy, New Left Review, 42, pp. 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009) Representative versus Responsible Government, MPIfG Working Paper 09/8 (Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies).
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2011a) Smaghi vs. the parties: representative government and institutional constraints. Paper prepared for the conference on Democracy in Straightjackets: Politics in an Age of Permanent Austerity, Munich, 23–26 March.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2011b) The Election in Context, in: M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds) How Ireland Voted 2011: The Full Story of Ireland’s Earthquake Election (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2011c) Preface to Hans Daalder, State Formation, Parties and Democracy: Studies in Comparative European Politics (Colchester: ECPR Press).
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1995) Democratic Governance (New York: The Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004) The populist zeitgeist, Government and Opposition, 39(4), pp. 542–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Piccio, D. R. (2012) Party Regulation in Europe: Country Reports, The Legal Regulation of Political Parties, Working Paper 18.
   Google Scholar
• Rob – Raad voor het openbaar bestuur (2010) Vertrouwen op democratie (The Hague).
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R. & Whitefield, S. (2012) The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2008) Making representations: modes and strategies of political parties, European Review, 16(3), pp. 271–286. doi: 10.1017/S1062798708000252
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. (2006) Party subsidies and the freezing of party competition: do cartel mechanisms work?, West European Politics, 29(4), pp. 619–639. doi: 10.1080/01402380600842148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. (2001) Parties are not what they once were, in: L. Diamond & R. Gunther (Eds) Political Parties and Democracy, pp. 67–89 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Selle, P. & Svåsand, L. (1991) Membership in party organizations and the problem of decline of parties, Comparative Political Studies, 23(4), pp. 459–477. doi: 10.1177/0010414091023004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. (2003) The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006) Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Tromp, B. (2003) De crisis der partijen en enkele voorstellen deze te overwinnen, in: F. Becker, M. Sie Dhian Ho, W. van Henneken & B. Tromp (Eds) Politieke partijen op drift. Het vierentwintigste jaarboek voor het democratisch socialisme (Amsterdam).
   Google Scholar
• Ware, A. (2011) Exceptionalism, political science and the comparative analysis of political parties, Government and Opposition, 46(4), pp. 411–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1948 [1918]) Politics as a vocation, in: H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, pp. 77–128 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P. (2011) Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world, Party Politics, 17(1), pp. 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks-Heeg, S., Blick, A. & Crone, S. (2012) How Democratic is the UK? The 2012 Audit, available at: http://democracy-uk-2012.democraticaudit.com (accessed 15 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Zaslove, A. (2008) Here to stay? Populism as a new party type, European Review, 16(3), pp. 319–336. doi: 10.1017/S1062798708000288
   Google Scholar