Polling ‘misses’ – can Q-methodology help? A case study of the Seanad referendum

References

• Addams, H., & Proops, J. L. (eds.). (2000). Social discourse and environmental policy: An application of Q methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Althaus, S. L. (1998). Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 545–558. doi: 10.2307/2585480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Of horseshoes and horse races: Experimental studies of the impact of poll results on electoral behavior. Political Communication, 11(4), 413–430. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1994.9963048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, G. (2016). Ireland and its referendums: Why we have them, what we do with them, how we conduct them. UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Research Paper No. 01/16.
   Google Scholar
• Beniger, J. R. (1992). The impact of polling on public opinion: Reconciling Foucault, Habermas, and Bourdieu. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4(3), 204–219. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/4.3.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J. (1999). The two faces of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1209–1230. doi: 10.2307/2991824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff, I., & Egbert, H. (2013). Social information and bandwagon behavior in voting: An economic experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 270–284. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. F. (2004). The illusion of public opinion: Fact and artifact in American public opinion polls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, C., & McCubbins, M. D. (2010). The blind leading the blind: Who gets polling information and does it improve decisions? The Journal of Politics, 72(02), 513–527. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990946
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, B. (1970). The government and politics of Ireland. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2011). The final Seanad election? In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland voted 2011: The Full Story of Ireland’s earthquake election (pp. 240–263). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K. (2013). How did the polls get it so wrong in the Seanad referendum? Blog Post. October 7. Retrieved from http://politicalreform.ie/2013/10/07/how-did-the-polls-get-it-so-wrong-and-how-did-i-clean-up-at-the-bookies/.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J. (2013). Kenny’s gamble will hinge on turnout. Irish Independent, September 2.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 634–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2008). Discursive representation. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 481–493. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517–551. doi: 10.1080/09640560701402075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1935). Design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Gael, F. (2010). New politics. Retrieved from http://cdn.thejournal.ie/media/2013/08/fine-gael-new-politics-march-2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2005). Parliament. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (pp. 211–237). London: Routledge with PSAI press.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. (2013). Public opinion polls do not always report public opinion. Blog post, April 29. Retrieved from http://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/public-opinion-polls-do-not-always-report-public-opinion/.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2014). Accuracy of vote expectation surveys in forecasting elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 204–232. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu008
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (1999). Effects of news slant and base rate information on perceived public opinion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 277–292. doi: 10.1177/107769909907600207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, R., & Maloney, J. (2013). Bandwagon effects in British elections, 1885–1910. Public Choice, 157(1–2), 73–90. doi: 10.1007/s11127-012-0027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2005). Polling politics, media, and election campaigns: Introduction. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 635–641. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivits, R., & Charles, M. B. (2015). Aviation planning policy in Australia: Identifying frames of reference to support public decision making. Journal of Air Transport Management, 47, 102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liston, V., & Chong, C. P. (2015). A comparative study of the effects of online Q-sorting applications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Science of Subjectivity conference, Ancona, Italy 2015.
   Google Scholar
• MacCarthaigh, M., & Martin, S. (2015). Bicameralism in the republic of Ireland: The Seanad abolition referendum. Irish Political Studies, 30(1), 121–131. doi:10.1080/07907184.2014.981534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. (2013). Seanad referendum in perspective. Blog post. Retrieved from http://politicalreform.ie/2013/10/11/seanad-referendum-in-perspective/.
   Google Scholar
• Mellon, J., & Prosser, C. (2017). Missing nonvoters and misweighted samples: Explaining the 2015 Great British polling miss. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(3), 661–687.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M. (2009). Political opinion polling in post-authoritarian Indonesia: Catalyst or obstacle to democratic consolidation? Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 165(1), 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C. (2016). The Seanad election: Second chamber, second chance. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland voted 2016: The election that nobody won (pp. 227–254). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Newport, F. (2004). Polling matters: Why leaders must listen to the wisdom of the people. New York, NY: Warner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A. J., & McFarland, K. (2011). Social theory and public opinion. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 87–107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. (2012). Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys/.
   Google Scholar
• Programme for Government 2011–2016. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/eng/Work_Of_The_Department/Programme_for_Government/Programme_for_Government_2011–2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Referendum Commission. (2013). Report on the referendums on the thirty-second amendment of the constitution (Abolition of Seanad Éireann) bill 2013 and thirty-third amendment of the constitution (Court of Appeal) bill 2013. Dublin: Referendum Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the working group on Seanad Reform. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.merrionstreet.ie/en/ImageLibrary/20150413SeanadReformFinal1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report on Seanad Reform: Seanad Eireann Committee on procedures and privileges sub-committee on Seanad reform. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/committees29thDáil/subcomonseanadreform/Report_on_Reform_of_the_Seanad.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, D., & Malhotra, M. (2014). Are public opinion polls self-fulfilling prophecies? Research & Politics, 1(2), 1–10. doi: 10.1177/2053168014547667
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, D. M., & Wolfers, J. (2011). Forecasting elections: Voter intentions versus expectations. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1884644 or http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884644.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2001). What are second chambers for? Parliamentary Affairs, 54, 442–458. doi: 10.1093/parlij/54.3.442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiawan, A. D., & Cuppen, E. (2013). Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia. Energy Policy, 61, 1188–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behaviour. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1965). Perspectives in psychology: XXIII. Definition of opinion, attitude and belief. The Psychological Record, 15(2), 281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Smith, P. (2010). Fictitious issues revisited: Political interest, knowledge and the generation of nonattitudes. Political Studies, 58(1), 66–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbott, A. D. (2010). The Q-block method of indexing Q typologies. Operant Subjectivity, 34(1), 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeten, M. J. (2001). Recasting intractable policy issues: The wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(3), 391–414. doi: 10.1002/pam.1000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerback, T., Koch, T., & Krämer, B. (2015). Thinking of others effects of implicit and explicit media cues on climate of opinion perceptions. Journalism & Mass Communication, 92(2), 421–443. doi: 10.1177/1077699015574481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar