Iris atrofusca genetic and phenotypic variation, the role of habitat-specific selection in this variation structuring, and conservation implications using quasi in situ guidelines

References

• Arafeh RMH, Sapir Y, Shmida A, Iraki N, Fragman O, Comes HP. 2002. Patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation in Iris haynei and I. atrofusca (Iris sect. Oncocyclus = the royal irises) along an ecogeographical gradient in Israel and the West Bank. Mol Ecol. 11:39–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avise JC, Hamrick JL. 1996. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Avishai M, Zohary D. 1980. Genetic affinities among the Oncocyclus irises. Bot Gaz. 141:107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JJ. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 12:13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 1:47–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamrick JL. 1983. The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations. In: Genetics and conservation. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings; p. 335–348.
   Google Scholar
• Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1996a. Conservation genetics of endemic plant species. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL, editors. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. New York: Chapman and Hall; p. 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1996b. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 351:1291–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedrick PW. 2001. Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol Evol. 16:629–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedrick PW, Miller PS. 1992. Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol Applic. 2:30–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufford KM, Mazer SJ. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter ML. 1996. Fundamentals of conservation biology. London: Blackwell Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston JA, Grise DJ, Donovan LA, Arnold ML. 2001. Environment-dependent performance and fitness of Iris brevicaulis, I. fulva (Iridaceae), and hybrids. Amer J Bot. 88:933–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin DA. 2000. The origin, expansion, and demise of plant species. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 70:3321–3323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybom H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol. 13:1143–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 6:288–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertoldi C, Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V. 2007. Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges. Biodiver Conserv. 16:4147–4163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir Y, Shmida A, Fragman O, Comes HP. 2002. Morphological variation of the Oncocyclus irises (Iris: Iridaceae) in the southern Levant. Bot J Linn Soc. 139:369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir Y, Shmida A, Ne'eman G. 2005. Pollination of the Oncocyclus irises (Iris: Iridaceae) by night-sheltering male bees. Plant Biol. 7:417–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaal BA, Leverich WJ, Rogstad SH. 1991. Comparison of methods for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology. In: Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; p. 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Shmida A, Pollak G. 2007. Red data book: endangered plants of Israel: Israel Nature and Parks Authority.
   Google Scholar
• StatSoft Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. www.statsoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Willard RW, Shaw JP, Dobson MC, Martin NH. 2011. Differential response of the homoploid hybrid species Iris nelsonii (Iridaceae) and its progenitors to abiotic habitat conditions. Amer J Bot. 98:1309–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M. 2010. Quasi in situ – a bridge between ex situ and in situ conservation of plants. Biodiver Conserv. 19:2441–2454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M, Sapir Y. 2007. Iris atrofusca of the northern Negev: population differences and creation of in situ gene banks. Research report. Beer Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
   Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M, Sapir Y. 2010. Application of complex conservation strategy to Iris atrofusca of the northern Negev, Israel. Biodiver Conserv. 19:3157–3169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407–4414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff DS. 2001. Populations, species and conservation genetics. In: Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Vol. 4. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wróblewska A, Brzosko E, Carnecka B, Nowosielski J. 2003. High level of genetic diversity in populations of Iris aphylla L. (Iridaceae), an endangered species in Poland. Bot J Linn Soc. 142:65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh FC, Rong-Cai Y, Boyle T. 1998. POPGENE version 1.31. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta, Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar