Use of oscillometric devices in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of three devices and invasive blood pressure measurement

References

• James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson T, Lip GY. Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: goodbye mercury? J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20:638–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollias A, Stergiou GS. Automated measurement of office, home and ambulatory blood pressure in atrial fibrillation. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;41:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Atkins N, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure monitors: a critical review of its application and rationale for revision. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15:39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAMI. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Destounis A, et al. Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30:2074–2082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel J, Abraham S, Messineo FC. Screening for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation while monitoring the blood pressure at home: trial of regular versus irregular pulse for prevention of stroke (TRIPPS 2.0). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1598–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, et al. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topouchian JA, El Assaad MA, Orobinskaia LV, et al. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT). Blood Press Monit. 2006;11:165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio A, et al. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12:233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L. Overview of agreement statistics for medical devices. J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18:126–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagonas N, Schmidt S, Eysel J, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2013;62:579–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Karpettas N. Does atrial fibrillation affect the automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement? Hypertension. 2013;62:e37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpert BS, Quinn DE, Friedman BA. A review of the latest guidelines for NIBP device validation. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Song C, Guo L, et al. Quality control and validation of oscillometric blood pressure measurements taken during an epidemiological investigation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1891.
   Google Scholar
• Graves JW, Nash C, Burger K, et al. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:823–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Chien PF. Evaluation of a clinical test. I: assessment of reliability. BJOG. 2001;108:562–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picone DS, Schultz MG, Otahal P, et al. Accuracy of Cuff-Measured Blood Pressure: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:572–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White WB, Lund-Johansen P, McCabe EJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Accutracker II ambulatory blood pressure monitor: assessment of performance in two countries and comparison with sphygmomanometry and intra-arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise. J Hypertens. 1989;7:967–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White WB, Lund-Johansen P, Omvik P. Assessment of four ambulatory blood pressure monitors and measurements by clinicians versus intraarterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar