In search of the Human: The trauma of modernity and the “instrumental reason” of the persecutors

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). New York: Zone Books, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1994). Essays in understanding: 1930–1954 (J. Kohn, Ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. (1988). Race, nation, class: Ambiguous identities (C. Turner, Trans.). London: Verso, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, E. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press (in association with Basil Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1936). The storyteller. In McKeon, M. (ed.), Theory of the novel: A historical approach (pp. 77–93). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bohleber, W. (2010). Destructiveness, intersubjectivity and trauma: The identity crisis of modern psychoanalysis. London: Karner.
   Google Scholar
• Calasso, R. (1991). I quarantanove gradini [The forty-nine steps]. Milano: Adelphi.
   Google Scholar
• Canetti, E. (1975). The conscience of words; and, Earwitness (J. Neugroschel, Trans.). London: Picador, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Egidi Morpurgo, V. (2008). Ethics of responsibility and psychoanalysis after Auschwitz. Italian Psychoanalytic Annual, 2, 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, R. (2004). A failed parricide: Hegel and the young Marx (P.D. Thomas and N. Iannelli Popham, Trans.). Leiden: Koninlijke Bill, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1961). History of madness (J. Murphy and J. Khalfa, Trans.). New York: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Friedländer, S. (ed.). (1992). Probing the limits of representation: Nazism and the “final solution.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (1944). Dialectic of enlightenment (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• La Capra, D. (1992). Representing the holocaust: Reflections on the historians’ debate. In S. Friedländer (ed.), Probing the limits of representation: Nazism and the “final solution” (pp. 108–127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laub, D. (1992). An event without a witness: Truth, testimony, and survival. In S. Felman and D. Laub (eds.), Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history (pp. 75–92). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littell, J. (2006). The kindly ones (C. Mandell, Trans.). London: Chatto & Windus, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.F. (1983). The differend: Phrases in dispute (G. Van Den Abbeele, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Maj, B. (2010). “Was aber schön ist, selig scheint es in ihm selbst.” Intermittenza delle immagini e “Unverletzlichkeit” [“What is beautiful appears blessed in itself”. Intermittency of the images and “inviolability”]. Engramma. La tradizione classica della memoria occidentale, 84. Retrieved May 26, 2018, from http://www.engramma.it/eOS/index.php?id_articolo=1857.
   Google Scholar
• Migliorino, F. (2014). Un animale in più: Efferati, inumani, mostruosi nelle maglie del diritto [One more animal: Brutal, inhuman, monstrous in the meshes of the law]. In A. Cernigliaro (ed.), Diritto e controllo sociale: Persone e status nelle prassi giuridiche [Law and social control: Persons and status in legal practices] (pp. 1–22). Torino: Giappichelli.
   Google Scholar
• Mucci, C. (2013). Beyond individual and collective trauma: Intergenerational transmission, psychoanalytic treatment, and the dynamics of forgiveness. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, U. (2016). Expropriated death: Alienation and nullification in Adorno’s Minima Moralia. In R. Crawford and E.M. Voigt (eds.), Adorno and the concept of genocide (pp. 84–99). Leiden: Brill-Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (2000). Memory, history, forgetting (K. Blamey and D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University Press of Chicago, 2004.
   Google Scholar