77
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Supervisees’ paradoxical need for knowledge

Pages 224-233 | Received 14 Nov 2017, Accepted 19 Nov 2018, Published online: 21 Dec 2018

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1975). Belief truth and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.
  • Bass, A. (2014) Supervision and analysis at a crossroad: The development of the analytic therapist: Discussion of papers by Joan Sarnat and Emanuel Berman. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 540–548.
  • Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2003). The relational turn in psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39, 379–409.
  • Berger, S.L., Kouzarides, T., Shiekhattar, R., & Shilatifard, A. (2009). An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes & Development, 23, 781– 793.
  • Bion, W. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Heinemann.
  • Blatt, S.J. (2013). The patient’s contribution to the therapeutic process. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 139–166.
  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Boston Change Process Study Group. (2010). Change in psychotherapy: A unifying paradigm. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Brakel, L.A. (2008). Knowledge and belief: Psychoanalytic evidence in support of a radical epistemic view. America Imago, 65, 427–471.
  • Bromberg, P. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  • Brown, L.J., & Miller, M. (2002). The triadic intersubjective matrix in supervision: The use of disclosure to work through painful affects. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 811–823.
  • Casement, P. (1985). Learning from the patient. New York: Guilford.
  • Chessick, R.D. (2008). The cultural ambiance of contemporary psychoanalysis: A view from Heidegger’s Study of Hölderlin’s Hymn, “The ister”. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 36, 495–515.
  • Chused, J. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 615–639.
  • Colman, W. (2004). Consciousness, the self and the isness business. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 21, 83–102.
  • Crastnopol, M. (2015). Micro-trauma: A psychoanalytic understanding of cumulative psychic injury. New York: Routledge.
  • Davis, D.R. (2015). Moments of meeting: A self psychological approach. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 10, 69–79.
  • Divino, C., & Moore, M.S. (2010). Integrating neurobiological findings into psychodynamic psychotherapy training and practice. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 337–355.
  • Fonagy, P., Bateman, A., & Luyten, P. (2012). Introduction and overview. In A. Bateman and P. Fonagy (eds.), Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice (pp. 45–73). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Fosha, D. (2005). Emotion, true self, true other, core state: Toward a clinical theory of affective change process. Psychoanalytic Review, 92, 513–551.
  • Fosshage, J.L. (1998). Self psychology and its contributions to psychoanalysis: An overview. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 5, 1–17.
  • Fosshage, J.L. (2012). A close tracking of therapeutic action in the clinical exchange. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 9, 20–30.
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 355–366.
  • Gabbard, G.O. (2006). Enactment contratransferencial e violação de fronteiras [Countertransferential enactment and crossing borders]. In J. Zaslavsky and M.J.P. Santos (eds.), Contratransférencia: Teoria e prética clinicas [Countertransference: Theory and practice] (pp. 236–243). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
  • Galatzer-Levy, R.M. (2004). Chaotic possibilities. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 419–441.
  • Gallese, V. (2006). Mirror neurons and intentional attunement: Commentary on Olds. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54, 47–57.
  • Gentile, K. (2016). Generating subjectivity through the creation of time. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33, 264–283.
  • Gilbert, R. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gilmore, K. (2002). Diagnosis, dynamics, and development: Considerations in the psychoanalytic assessment of children with AD/HD. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22, 372–390.
  • Goldman, A. (1976). Discrimination and perceptual knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 73, 771–791.
  • Greenberg, J. (2012). Commentary on José Bleger’s theory and practice in psychoanalysis: Psychoanalytic praxis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93, 1005–1016.
  • Harnischfeger, J. (2017). Helpful thoughts – Some reflections on the psychodynamic treatment of traumatized refugees. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 14, 22–34.
  • Hirsch, I. (1998). The concept of enactment and theoretical convergence. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67, 78–100.
  • Hoffman, I.Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in psychoanalytic process: A dialectical-constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  • Holzman, P. (1998). Psychoanalysis and psychopathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Jones, B. (2011). The reality-sampling deficit and ADHD: Indication for an active technique. Journal of Infant, Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 10, 73–86.
  • Jones, S., & Bunston, W. (2012). The “original couple”: Enabling mothers and infants to think about what destroys as well as engenders love, when there has been intimate partner violence. Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 2, 215–232.
  • King, A. (2011). Touch as relational affirmation. Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis, 5, 108–124.
  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lachman, F.M. (2015). Paul and I like to read good literature. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 10, 142–147.
  • Levine, H., & Friedman, R.J. (2000). Intersubjectivity and interaction in the analytic relationship: A mainstream view. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 69, 63–92.
  • Lewis, D.K. (1983). Mad pain and Martian pain. In D. Lewis (ed.) Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1, pp. 122–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 576–617.
  • Maroda, K.J. (1998). Enactment: When the patient’s and analyst’s pasts converge. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 517–535.
  • Mayes, L.C. & Cohen, D.J. (1996). Children’s developing theory of mind. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44, 117–142.
  • Mitchell, S.A. (1998). The analyst’s knowledge and authority. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXVII, 1–31.
  • Mollon, P. (1989). Anxiety, supervision and a space for thinking: Some narcissistic perils for clinical psychologists in learning psychotherapy. British Journal Medical Psychology, 62, 113–122.
  • Moore, B.E., & Fine, B.D. (1990). Psychoanalytic terms and concepts. New Haven, CT: American Psychoanalytic Association & Yale University Press.
  • Newirth, J. (2015). Psychoanalysis’ past, present, and future: Sherlock Holmes, Sir Lancelot, and the Wizard of Oz. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32, 307–320.
  • Ogden, T.H. (2005). On psychoanalytic supervision. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86, 1265–1280.
  • Ornstein, P.H. (2011). The centrality of empathy in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 31, 437–447.
  • O’Shaughnessy, E. (1994). What is a clinical fact? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 939–947.
  • Piha, H. (2005). Intuition. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53, 23–49.
  • Poland, W. (2006). The analyst’s fears. American Imago, 63, 201–17.
  • Poland, W.S. (2009). The patient’s empathy. American Imago, 66, 495–499.
  • Riggs, A.D., Russo, V.E., & Martienssen, R.A. (1996). Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor.
  • Schafer, R. (1959). Generative empathy in the treatment situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 28, 342–373.
  • Searles, H. (1949). Concerning transference and countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2017; 27, 192–210.
  • Shabad, P. (2010). Everyone must get a turn: From omnipotence to respect for otherness: Reply to commentary. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 733–737.
  • Shulman, L.S. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Paper presented at the Math Science Partnerships Workshop, February 6–8, 2005, hosted by National Research Council Center for Education, Irvine, California.
  • Slade, A. (2002). Keeping the baby in mind: A critical factor in perinatal mental health. Zero to Three, 22, 610–616.
  • Stern, D. (2000). The relevance of empirical infant research to psychoanalytic theory and practice. In J. Sandler, A.M. Sandler, and R. Davies (eds.), Clinical and observational psychoanalytic research: Roots of a controversy André Green and Daniel Stern (p. 89–102). London: Karnac.
  • Stolorow, R.D. (2014) Undergoing the situation: Emotional dwelling is more than empathic understanding. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 9, 80–83.
  • Stolorow, R. Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  • Sucharov, M.S. (2002). Representation and the intrapsychic. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22, 686–707.
  • Symington, N. (1983). The analyst’s act of freedom as agent of therapeutic change. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 10, 283–291.
  • Wachtel, P.L. (2010). Beyond ‘ESTs’: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27, 251–272.
  • Watkins, E. (2016) Psychoanalytic supervision in the new millennium: On pressing needs and impressing possibilities. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 25, 50–67.
  • Wellman, H. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/A Bradford Book.
  • Winnicott, D.W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. International Psycho-Analytic Library no. 64. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
  • Wolstein, B. (1997). A proposal to enlarge the individual model of psychoanalytic supervision. In M.H. Rock (ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 239–257). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
  • Zachrisson, A. (2011). Dynamics of psychoanalytic supervision: A heuristic model. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 943–961.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.