1927–2017: Ferenczi and the interpersonal school of psychoanalysis, the debate continues

References

• Antonelli, G. (1997). Il mare di Ferenczi. La storia, il pensiero, la tecnica di un maestro della psicoanalisi [Ferenczi's sea. The history, the thought, the technique of a master of psychoanalysis]. Rome: Di Renzo Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault. Therapeutic aspects of regression. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995a). What angel would hear me: The erotics of transference. In: Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference (pp. 143–174). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995b). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In: Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference (pp. 27–48). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. (1999). Sándor Ferenczi today: Reviving the broken dialectic. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 303–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bleichmar, H. (1999). Stati molteplici dell’inconscio (il non costituito, il rimosso, la Untergang freudiana) e loro conseguenze per il trattamento analitico. [Multiple states of the unconscious (the unconstituted, the repressed, the Freudian Untergang) and their consequences for analytic treatment]. In F. Borgogno (ed.), La partecipazione affettiva dell’analista. Il contributo di Sándor Ferenczi al pensiero psicoanalitico contemporaneo [The affective participation of the analyst. Contribution of Sándor Ferenczi to contemporary psychoanalytic thought] (pp. 40–56). Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, H.P. (2004). Il “poppante saggio” e l’ “analista selvaggio” [The “wise baby” and the “wild analyst”] (pp. 95–114). In F. Borgogno (Ed.), Ferenczi oggi. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Bonomi, C., & Borgogno, F. (2001). La catastrofe e i suoi simboli. Il contributo di Sándor Ferenczi alla teoria psicoanalitica del trauma [The catastrophe and its symbols. Sándor Ferenczi's contribution to the psychoanalytic theory of trauma]. Turin: UTET Libreria.
   Google Scholar
• Borgogno, F. (1999). Psychoanalysis as a journey. London: Open Gate Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2000). Sullivan revisited. Life and Work. Harry Stack Sullivan’s relevance for contemporary psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Trento: Tangram Edizioni Scientifiche, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Conci, M., Dazzi, S., & Mantovani, M.L. (1997). La tradizione interpersonale in psichiatria, psicoterapia e psicoanalisi [The interpersonal tradition in psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychoanalysis]. Rome: Erre Emme.
   Google Scholar
• Cremerius, J. (1991). Limiti e possibilità della tecnica psicoanalitica [Limits and possibilities of the psychoanalytic technique]. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1922). Freud’s group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Progress in individual psychology. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (Chap. XLIII). London: Hogarth Press, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1928). The adaptation of the family to the child. In M. Balint (ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 61–76). London: Karnac, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In M. Balint (ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 102–107). London: Karnac, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child analysis in the analysis of adults. In M. Balint (ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 126–142). London: Karnac, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1932a). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child (1932). In M. Balint (ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1932b). The clinical diary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Gaburri, E., & Ambrosiano, L. (2003). Ululare con i lupi: Conformismo e rêverie [Howling with wolves. Conformity and rêverie]. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Haynal, A. (1999). Il controtransfert nell’opera di Ferenczi [The countertransference in the work of Ferenczi]. In F. Borgogno (ed.), La partecipazione affettiva dell’analista. Il contributo di Sándor Ferenczi al pensiero psicoanalitico contemporaneo [The affective participation of the analyst. Contribution of Sándor Ferenczi to contemporary psychoanalytic thought] (pp. 23–39). Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G.W. (1807). The phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E.A. (1972). The fallacy of understanding. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E.A. (1980). More different than alike. Speculations on the uniqueness of the psychoanalytic experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 16, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, E.A. (1983). The ambiguity of change. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E.A. (1994). Beyond countertransference – aspects of the analyst’s desire. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 30, 691–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Cabré, L. (2004). “Nec ioco quidem mentiretur!”: Intuizioni di Ferenczi sulla natura e sulla funzione terapeutica dell’interpretazione psicoanalitica [Ferenczi's insights into the nature and therapeutic function of psychoanalytic interpretation]. In Ferenczi oggi (pp. 225–237). Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Sarno, L. (1999). Dalla “confusione delle lingue” al “senso comune”: Ferenczi, Bion e la questione della fondazione originaria della relazione analitica. [From “confusion of the tongues” to “common sense”: Ferenczi, Bion and the question of the original foundation of the analytic relationship]. In F. Borgogno (ed.), La partecipazione affettiva dell’analista. Il contributo di Sándor Ferenczi al pensiero psicoanalitico contemporaneo [The affective participation of the analyst. Contribution of Sándor Ferenczi to contemporary psychoanalytic thought] (pp. 307–315). Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Sarno, L. (2004). La relazionalità traumatica: dal trauma infantile alla teoria traumatica della conoscenza [Traumatic relationality: from childhood trauma to the traumatic theory of knowledge]. In Borgogno F. (ed.), Ferenczi oggi (pp. 115–133). Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, J.H. (2007). Personal agency and the possession of memory. In Memory: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 299–317). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, J.H. (2011). The importance of having an “agency” on the other. The repair of agency and the analyst’s personal influence. In F. Borgogno (ed.), La signorina che faceva hara-kiri e altri scritti [The girl who committed hara-kiri and other clinical and historical essays] (pp. 105–116). London: Karnac, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, J.H., & Pollock, L. (1997). The poisoning of desire. The destruction of agency and the recovery of psychic integrity in sexual abuse. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33, 573–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott D.W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. studies in the theory of emotional development. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar