Global vernetzte Psychoanalyse. Die International Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies (IFPS) zwischen 1960 und 1980 [A globally connected psychoanalysis. The International Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies (IFPS) between 1960 and 1980]

References

• Barnett, J. (1965). Cognitive disturbances in the obsessive neurosis. Paper given at the IInd IFPS Forum, 1965, Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeyer, F. (1971). Zur Geschichte der Psychoanalyse in Deutschland [On the history of psychoanalysis in Germany]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin, 17, 203–240
   Google Scholar
• Beese, F. (1971). Bericht über das II. Workshop des Internationalen Psychoanalytischen Forums in Madrid 1970 [Report on the IInd Workshop of the International Psychoanalytic Forum in Madrid 1970]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin, 17, 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti, G. (1987). Psychotherapy of schizophrenia. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brundke, A. (2008). Vom “überzeugtem” Nationalsozialisten zum Psychoanalytiker – Anton Schelkopfs “Entnazifizierung” und seine Karriere am Institut [From “convinced” Nazi to psychoanalyst – Anton Schelkopf’s “de-Nazification” and his career at the institute]. In T. Bauriedl and A. Brundke (Eds.), Psychoanalyse in München – Eine Spurensuche [Psychoanalysis in Munich – A historical research] (pp. 343–359). Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, I. (1966). Die psychoanalytische Situation als mikrosoziales Modell [The psychoanalytic situation as micro-social model]. Fortschritte der Psychoanalyse, 2, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Chrzanowski, G. (1964). The impact of interpersonal conceptions on psychoanalytic technique. Forstschritte der Psychoanalyse, 1, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Chrzanowski, G. (1975). Psychoanalysis: Ideology and practitioners. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 11, 492–499.
   Google Scholar
• Chrzanowski, G. (1977). Interpersonal approach to psychoanalysis. Contemporary view of H.S. Sullivan. New York: Gardner Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2003). Review of the book by J.A. Goggin and E. Brockman Goggin “Death of a ‘Jewish Science’. Psychoanalysis in the Third Reich”, Perdue University Press, 2003. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 12, 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2012). Sullivan revisited – Life and work (2nd ed.) Trento: Tangram. Original Italian edition, 2000, German edition, 2005, and Spanish edition, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2018). Marco Conci interviews Michael Ermann. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 27, 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2019). Freud, Sullivan, Mitchell, Bion, and the multiple voices of international psychoanalysis. New York: International Psychoanalytic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2021). Psicologia dell’Io. Una prospettiva europea [Ego psychology. A European perspective]. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 55, 425–466.
   Google Scholar
• Ermann, M. (2009). Michael Ermann interviews Carola Mann. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 18, 250–253.
   Google Scholar
• Feiner, A. (1975). The dilemma of integrity. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 11, 500–509.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1977). Das psychoanalytische Bild vom Menschen und seine gesellschaftliche Standortbedingtheit [The psychoanalytic image of man and its social conditionment. Weiterentwicklung der Psychoanalyse und ihre Anwendungen, 5, 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E., & Maccoby, M. (1970). Social character in a Mexican village: A socio-psychoanalytic study. New York: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Heigl, F. (1969). Tagungsbericht Psychosomatische Medizin und psychoanalytische Behandlungsmethoden [Conference report psychosomatic medicine and psychoanalytic treatment methods]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin, 15, 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Heigl, F. (1973). Indikation and Prognose in Psychoanalyse und Psychotherapie [Indication and prognosis in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy]. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Katwan, G. (1978). Bericht über das VI. Internationale Forum der Psychoanalye in Berlin vom 17.-21. August [Report on the VIth International Forum of Psychoanalysis in Berlin, 17-21 August 1977]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse, 24, 258–297.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, L. (1998). “Umsonst war’s nicht”. Bericht einer betroffenen Zeitzeugin [“It was not useless”. Report of an involved witness]. In L. Hermanns (ed.), Psychoanalyse in Selbstdarstellungen [Psychoanalysis in autobiography] (Vol. IV, pp. 165–230). Tübingen: Edition Diskord.
   Google Scholar
• Lionells, M., Fiscalini, J., Mann, C.H., & Stern, D.B. (1995). Handbook of interpersonal psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockot, R. (1985). Erinnern und Durcharbeiten [Remembering and working-through]. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Lockot, R. (1994). Die Reinigung der Psychoanalyse. Die DPG im Spiegel von Dokumenten und Zeitzeugen [The purification of psychoanaysis. The DPG in the mirror of documents and eye-witnesses]. Tübingen: Edition Diskord.
   Google Scholar
• Lothane, H.Z. (2003). Power politics and psychoanalysis: An introduction. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 12, 85–97.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, N.(1999). Psychoanalytic case formulation. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelkopf, A. (1977). Analytische und irrationale Aspekte politischer Verführung und Verführbarkeit [Analytic and irrational aspects of political seduction and proneness to being seduced]. Weiterentwicklung der Psychoanalyse und ihre Anwendungen, 5, 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, R. (1975). Survival of psychoanalysis in Nazi Germany. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 11, 479–491.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, R. (1985). Survival, psychoanalysis, and the Third Reich. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 13, 521–536.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallerstein, R.S. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69, 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar