“Being myself as the analyst I have become:” An interview with Jay B. Frankel

References

• Altman, N., Briggs, R., Frankel, J., Gensler, D., & Pantone, P. (2002). Relational child psychotherapy. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L.E., & Harris, A.E. (1993). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Berne, E. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, B.W. (2018). Ferenczi’s patients and their contribution to his legacy. In A. Dimitrijević, G. Cassullo, and J. Frankel (eds.), Ferenczi’s influence on contemporary psychoanalytic traditions (pp. 85–97). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chused, J. (1982). The role of analytic neutrality in the use of the child analyst as a new object. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 30, 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci, M. (2019). Freud, Sullivan, Mitchell, Bion and the multiple voices of international psychoanalysis. New York: International Psychoanalytic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijević, A. (2021). “At my core, I am a psychoanalyst, but … ”: An interview with Michael B. Buchholz. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 30, 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijević, A. (in press). “Born in the middle of psychoanalysis.” An interview with Judith Dupont. American Journal of Psychoanalysis.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijević, A., Cassullo, G., & Frankel, J. (eds.) (2018). Ferenczi’s influence on contemporary psychoanalytic traditions. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, J. (1988). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, ed.; M. Balint and N.Z. Jackson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. (2005). The telescoping of generations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (M. Balint, ed.; E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 102–107). New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1930). The principle of relaxation and neocatharsis. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (M. Balint, ed.; E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 108–125). New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child-analysis in the analysis of adults. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (M. Balint, ed.; E. Mosbacher et al., Trans.) (pp. 126–142). New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J.B. (1998). Are interpersonal and relational psychoanalysis the same? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34, 485–500.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. (2002). Exploring Ferenczi’s concept of identification with the aggressor: Its role in trauma, everyday life, and the therapeutic relationship. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 101–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. (2011). The analytic state of consciousness as a form of play and a foundational transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 1411–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. (2015). The persistent sense of being bad: The moral dimension of identification with the aggressor. In A. Harris and S. Kuchuck (eds.), The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi (pp. 224–242). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. (2020). Silence is golden (usually). In A. Dimitrijevic and M.B. Buchholz (eds.), Silence and silencing in psychoanalysis (pp. 157–170). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. (2022). Traumatic aloneness in children with narcissistically preoccupied parents. In A. Dimitrijevic and M.B. Buchholz (eds.), From the abyss of loneliness to the bliss of solitude. Cultural, social and psychoanalytic perspectives (pp. 279–293). Bicester, UK: Phoenix Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and analysis of the ego. SE 18: 65–143.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J.R., & Mitchell, S.A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guntrip, H. (1975). My experience of analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott (How complete a result does psycho-analytic therapy achieve?). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 2, 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo ludens. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (1981). Prisoners of childhood: The drama of the gifted child and the search for the true self. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.A. (1986). The wings of Icarus: Illusion and the problem of narcissism. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22, 107–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T.H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R.S. (1988). Lay analysis: Life inside the controversy. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D.W. (1945). Primitive emotional development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26, 137–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D.W. (1954). Withdrawal and regression. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis (pp. 255–261). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D.W. (1960). The theory of the parent–child relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 585–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstein, B. (1981) Psychology of the self and immediate experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 17, 136–143.
   Google Scholar