References
- Baranger, M. & Baranger, W. (1961–1962). La situación analítica como campo dinámico [The analytic situation as a dynamic field]. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 4, 3–54.
- Bezoari, M., & Ferro, A. (1989). Listening, interpretations and transformative functions in the analytical dialogue. Rivista di Psychoanalisi, 35, 1014–1050.
- Bezoari, M. & Ferro, A. (1991). A journey through the bipersonal field of analysis. From roleplaying to transformations in the couple. Rivista di Psychoanalisi, 37, 4–46.
- Bezoari, A., & Ferro, A. (1992). From a play between “parts” to transformations in the couple. Psychoanalysis in a bipersonal field. In A. Nissim Momigliano and A. Robutti (eds.), Shared experience: The psychoanalytic dialogue (pp. 246–270). London: Karnac.
- Borgogno, F. (2018). Come ho inteso e via via appreso negli anni 1975–1995 la “relazione analitica”: un piccolo “amarcord” sulla psicoanalisi milanese e torinese [How I understood and gradually learned in the years 1975–1995 about the “analytical relationship”: a small “amarcord” on psychoanalysis in Milan and Turin]. Rivista di Psychoanalisi, 64, 813–830.
- Corrao F. (1986). Il concetto di campo come modello teorico [The concept of field as a theoretical model]. In Orme [Footprints], vol. II. Milan, Cortina, 1998.
- Corrao F. (1987). L'interpretazione psicoanalitica come fondazione di un campo ermeneutico e dei suoi funtori [Psychoanalytic interpretation as the foundation of a hermeneutic field and its functors]. In Orme [Footprints]. Milan: Cortina, 1998.
- Junkers, G. (2013). The empty couch: The taboo of ageing and retirement in psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
- Pirandello, L. (1937). The mountain giants. London: Absolute Classics, 1993.