Navigating the Intimate Unknown: Vulnerability as an Affective Relation

References

• Ahäll, L. (2018). Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergoffen, D. B. (2009). Exploiting the dignity of the vulnerable body: Rape as a weapon of war. Philosophical Papers, 38(3), 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouge, R. (2007). Deleuze’s way assays in transverse ethics and aesthetics. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, S. (2016). Bouncing back: Vulnerability and resistance in times of resiliance. In J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, & L. Sabsay (Eds.), Vulnerability in resistance (pp. 52–75). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2009). The new empiricism. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A. (2016). All of us are vulnerable, but some are more vulnerable than others: The political ambiguity of vulnerability studies, an ambivalent critique. Critical Horizons, 17(2), 260–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in philosophy. M. Joughin, Trans.. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004). Desert Islands and Other Texts, 1953–1974. D. Lapoujade, Trans.. Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Series. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. B. Massumi, Trans.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrarese, E. (2016a). Vulnerability: A concept with which to undo the world as it is? Critical Horizons, 17(2), 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarese, E. (2016b). The vulnerable and the political: On the seeming impossibility of thinking vulnerability and the political together and its consequences. Critical Horizons, 17(2), 224–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 8–40.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. A. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60(2009), 251–275.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, E. C. (2014). The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822393047.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1999). Becomings. Explorations in time, memory, and future. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmaster, B. (2006). What does vulnerability mean. Hastings Center Report, 36(2), 38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labour: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (2019). Learning from my daughter: The value and care of disabled minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, M., & Juvonen, T. (2018). Introduction: Thinking with and through affective inequalities. In T. Juvonen & M. Kolehmainen (Eds.), Affective inequalities in intimate relationships (pp. 1–15). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2011). Affect in the key of politics. Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, 8(1), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, E. (2017). Mood, method and affect: Current shifts in feminist theory. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 1(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2005). Blush faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puig De La Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozmarin, M. (2017). Vulnerable futures, transformative pasts: On vulnerability, temporality, and ethics. Oxford: Peter Lang, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. (2010). The politics of affect spinoza in the work of Negri and Deleuze. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(4), 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. (A. Frank, Ed.). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfert, R. (2012). Beyond personal feelings and collective emotions: Toward a theory of social affect. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(6), 27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. (2010). Desiring recognition, accumulating affect. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect reader (pp. 269–285). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wettergren, Å., & Hanna, W. (2014). Who is a refugee? Political subjectivity and the categorisation of Somali asylum seekers in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(4), 566–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar