Better Safe than Sorry? Indigenous Peoples, Carbon Cowboys and the Governance of REDD in the Amazon

References

• Aguilar-Støen, Mariel, 2015, ‘Global forest conservation initiatives as spaces for participation in Colombia and Costa Rica’, Geoforum, Vol. 61, pp. 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Støen, M. and C. Hirsch, 2015, ‘REDD+ and forest governance in Latin America: The role of science-policy networks’, in B. Bull and M. Aguilar-Støen, eds, Environmental Politics in Latin America. Elite Dynamics, the Left Tide and Sustainable Development, London: Routledge, pp. 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Støen, M., 2016, ‘Beyond transnational corporations, food and biofuels: The role of extractivism and agribusiness in land grabbing in Central America’, Forum for Development Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1–21. doi: 10.1080/08039410.2016.1144381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Støen, M., F. Toni and C. Hirsch, 2015, ‘Latin American approaches to “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation REDD”’, in F. de Castro, B. Hoogenbom, and M. Baud, eds, Environmental Governance in Latin America. Conflicts, Projects and Possibilities, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 205–233.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., A. Carrasquilla and J. J. Echavarria, 2005, Decentralization in Colombia, in A. Alesina, ed, Institutional Reforms: The Case of Colombia, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvardo, Leonardo J., 2007, ‘Prospects and challenges in the implementation of indigenous peoples’ human rights in international law: Lessons from the case of Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua’, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 24, pp. 609–644.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M. D., 2003, ‘Forests in the time of violence’, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, Vol. 16, No. 3–4, pp. 47–68. doi: 10.1300/J091v16n03_03
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, Anthony, 1996, ‘Organizations and intensifications: Campesino federations, rural livelihoods and agricultural technology in the Andes and Amazonia’, World Development, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 1161–1177. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., M. Betsill, J. Gupta, N. Kanie, L. Lebel, D. Liverman, H. Schroeder and B. Siebenhuener, 2009, Earth System Governance: People, Places and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project Earth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20, Bonn, IHDP (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bumpus, A. G. and D. Liverman, 2011, ‘Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reduction and sustainable development’, in R. Peet, P. Robbins and M. J. Watts, eds, Global Political Ecology, New York: Routledge, pp. 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• COICA, 2012, Consolidation of Indigenous Territories: Condition and Indicator concerning REDD+. Holistic Management Alternative for Territories as a Source of life (or ‘Indigenous Amazonian REDD+’).
   Google Scholar
• Colombia, 2011, ‘Colombia’s Readiness Preparation Proposal for REDD+ (R-PP)’.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E. and H. Schroeder, 2011, ‘Governing and implementing REDD+’, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J. and M. Leach, 2003, Science Society and Power: Environmental Knowledge and Policy in West Africa and the Caribbean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980, ‘Two lectures’, in C. Gordon, ed, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, New York: Pantheon, 78–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Charles R., 1994, ‘Between Che Guevara and the Pachamama: Mestizos, Indians and Identity Politics in the Anti-quincentenary Campaign’, Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 9–39. doi: 10.1177/0308275X9401400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, Charles R., 1996, Resistance and Contradiction: Miskitu Indians and the Nicaraguan State, 1894–1987, Standford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, Garrett, 1968, ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science, Vol. 162, No. 3859, pp. 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., 2007, ‘Beware the carbon offsetting cowboys’, Financial Times, 26 April.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1990, Fifth Branch. Science Advisers and Policymakers, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Wil, Dennis del Castillo Torres and Ángel Salazar, 2014, ‘Carbon cowboys in Peru and the prospects of local REDD governance’, Portes: Revista Mexicana de Estudios Sobre la Cuenca del Pacifico, Vol. 8, No. 16, pp. 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Billon, Philippe, 2001, ‘The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts’, Political Geography, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 561–584. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray, 2005, ‘Beyond “The State” and failed schemes’, American Anthropologist, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 383–394. doi: 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, Larry, 2012, ‘Financialization, commodification and carbon: The contradictions of neoliberal climate policy’, Socialist Register, Vol. 48, pp. 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Offen, Karl H., 2003, ‘The territorial turn: Making black territories in Pacific Colombia’, Journal of Latin American Geography, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 43–73. doi: 10.1353/lag.2004.0010
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor, 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner and James Walker, 1994, Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., P. Robbins, and M. Watts, 2011, ‘Global nature’, in R. Peet, P. Robbins and M. Watts, eds, Global Political Ecology, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, John and B. Guy Peters, 2000, Governance, Politics, and the State, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Heike, 2010, ‘Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 317–332. doi: 10.1007/s10784-010-9138-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 1998, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Aradhana and Akhil Gupta, 2006, ‘Introduction: Rethinking theories of the state in an age of globalization’, in A. Sharma and A. Gupta, eds, The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sieder, Rachel, 2002, Multiculturalism in Latin America, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stahler-Sholk, Richard, 2007, ‘Resisting Neoliberal Homogenization: The Zapatista Autonomy Movement’, Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 48–63. doi: 10.1177/0094582X06298747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cott, Donna Lee, 2000, The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America, Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Pre.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cott, Donna Lee, 2005, From Movements to Parties in Latin America: The Evolution of Ethnic Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, E., 2014, Interview (Vasquez is the president of COICA).
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. H., 1992, Privatisation as a Conservation Policy, South Melbourne: Cent. Int. Res. Commun. Inf. Technol. (CIRCIT).
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, Deborah J., 1999, ‘Democracy, indigenous movements, and postliberal challenge in Latin America’, World Politics, Vol. 52, No. 01, pp. 76–104. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100020037
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, Deborah J., 2005, Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar