NGOs, Partnership and Accountability – A Case Study of ActionAid and its Local NGO Partners in Nigeria

References

• ActionAid, 2010, ‘Action on rights: Human rights-based approach resources book’, https://hive.actionaid.org/Field_Staff_Programming_Forum/default.aspx (accessed on 27 August 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Baaz, M., 2005, The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, N. and D. Hulme, 2012, ‘The role of NGOs and civil society in development and poverty reduction’, BWPI Working Paper 171.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, N. and D. Hulme, 2014, ‘New development alternatives or business as usual with a new face? The transformative potential of new actors and alliances in development’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 181–195, doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.868997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. J., S. Hickey and D. Mitlin, 2007, Can NGOs Make a Difference: The Challenge of Development Alternatives, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• BOND, 2015, Fast Forward: The Changing Role of UK INGOs, London: INTRAC.
   Google Scholar
• BOND, 2016, ‘Leaving no one behind: Putting marginalised people at the forefront of the sustainable development goals’, Group Working Paper, https://www.bond.org.uk/sites/default/files/resource-documents/leaving-no-one-behind-0516.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, A. S., 2007, ‘A rights-based approach to accountability: An exploration of RBA theory as a mechanism of downward accountability in development and humanitarian NGOs’, Masters in City Planning Thesis, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, V. M., E. Harris-Curtis, L. Padrao and M. Tanner, 2004, Autonomy or Dependence: Case Studies of North-South NGO Partnerships, Oxford: INTRAC.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. M., 2002, Partnership for International Development: Rhetoric or Results?, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P., 1988, ‘Relations between Southern and Northern NGOs in the context of sustainability, participation and partnership in development’, Discussion paper prepared by ICVA's Working Group on Development Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Crack, A., 2013, ‘INGO accountability deficits: The imperatives for further reform’, Globalizations, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 293–308, doi:10.1080/14747731.2013.786253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, G. and B. Andreassen, 2015, ‘Human rights and development: Putting power and politics at the centre’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 662–690, doi:10.1353/hrq.2015.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, E. and E. Harrison, 1998, Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J., 2003, ‘The paradox of sustainability: Reflections on NGOs in Bangladesh’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 590, No. 1, pp. 227–242, doi:10.1177/0002716203257067.
   Google Scholar
• Eade, D., 2006, Preface to Development, NGOs and Civil Society, Selected Essays from Development in Practice (Edited), Oxford: Oxfam GB.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., 2006, Towards a reflective accountability in NGOs, in A. Ebrahim and E. Weisband, eds, Forging Global Accountabilities: Participation, Pluralism and Public Ethics, London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–224.
   Google Scholar
• Elbers, W., 2012, ‘The partnership paradox: The principles and practice in north-south NGO relations’, A PhD thesis submitted to de Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Elbers, W. and L. Schulpen, 2013, ‘Corridors of power: The institutional design of north-south NGO partnerships’, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 48–67, doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9332-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., 2003, ‘The rise of rights: Rights-based approaches to international development’, IDS Policy Briefing, Issue 17.
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., ed, 2006, Relationships for Aid, London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, A., 2000, ‘Introduction: Beyond partnership: Getting real about NGO relationships in the aid chain’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 1–13, doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31003001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, A., 2015, ‘International non-governmental organisations and aid: No longer a case of levelling the partner playing field’, State of Civil Society Report: Guest Essay.
   Google Scholar
• Gready, P., 2008, ‘Rights-based approaches to development: What is the value-added?’, Development in Practice, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 735–747, doi:10.1080/09614520802386454.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D., 2015, ‘Fit for the future? Development trends and the role of international NGOs’, www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/INGO-futures-Green-v5-April-2015-edited.docx (accessed on 18 October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K., 2000, ‘Constructing an NGO sector in transnational contexts: The reach of NGO-donor partnership in Post-Soviet Georgia’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 48–56, doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31003005.x.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., 2000, Working together: The principles and practices of cooperation and partnership, in D. Robinson, T. R. Hewitt and J. Harriss, eds, Managing Development: Understanding Inter-organisational Relationships, London: Sage, pp. 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Curtis, E., O. Marleyn and O. Bakewell, 2005, ‘The implications for northern NGOs for adopting the rights-based approaches’, Occasional Paper Series No.41, INTRAC.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2007, ‘African NGOs: The new compradors?’, Development and Change, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1095–1110, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00447.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. and J. Pearce, 2002, Civil Society and Development: A Critical Exploration, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyer, H., 1994, ‘Reflection on partnership and accompaniment’, Institutional Development, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kilby, P., 2006, ‘Accountability for empowerment: Dilemmas facing non-governmental organisations’, World Development, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 951–963, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindornay, S., J. Ron and C. Carpenter, 2012, ‘Rights-based approaches to development: Implications for NGOs’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 472–506, doi:10.1353/hrq.2012.0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, B., 2012, ‘Diaspora and development? London-based Nigeria organisation and the transnational politics of socio-economic status and gender’, Development Policy Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 149–167, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2012.00569.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungman, C., 2004, Applying a Rights-based Approach to Development: Concepts and Principles, in Britha Mikkelsen’s Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide to Practitioners, New Delhi: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, I., 2009, ‘The rights-based approach to adult education: Implications for NGO–government partnerships in Southern Tanzania’, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 263–279, doi:10.1080/03057920902750517.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, B., 1991, Canadian NGOs and the politics of participation, in J. Swift and B. Tomlinson, eds, Conflicts of Interest, Toronto: Between the Lines, pp. 161–211.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, K., 2004, ‘The end of blind faith? Civil society and the challenge of accountability, legitimacy and transparency’, Accountability Forum, Vol. 2, pp. 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Offenheiser, C. and S. Holcombe, 2003, ‘Challenges and opportunities in implementing a rights-based approach to development: An Oxfam America perspective’, Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 268–301, doi:10.1177/0899764003032002006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawoore, B., 2017, ‘The implications of the rights-based approach on NGOs’ funding’, Development in Practice, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 515–527, doi:10.1080/09614524.2017.1307943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005, Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: A Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Comprising of OECD/DAC and Partner Countries: OECD Paper, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2008, Accra Agenda for Action, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2011, Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Postma, W., 1994, ‘NGO partnership and institutional development: Making it real, making it intentional’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 543–553.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, L. A. and S. Ponte, 2014, ‘New actors and alliances in development’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1–21, doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.868979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., 2010, ‘Corruption, NGOs and development in Nigeria’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 243–258, doi:10.1080/01436591003711975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szporluk, M., 2009, ‘A framework for understanding 1 g accountability of international NGOs and global good governance’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 339–361, doi:10.2979/gls.2009.16.1.339.
   Google Scholar
• Tandon, R., 1990, Partnership in social development evaluation: A thematic paper, in D. Marsden and P. Oakley, eds, Evaluating Social Development Projects, Oxford: Oxfam, pp. 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 1997, New Partnership Initiative (NPI) Resource Guide: A Strategic Guide to Development Partnering: Report of the NPI Learning Team, Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ushie, V., 2012, ‘Political decentralisation and natural resources governance in Nigeria’, Research report, The North-South Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vakil, A., 1997, ‘Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs’, World Development, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 2057–2070, doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00098-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Brabant, K., 2016, ‘Five ways to make aid locally sourced, global development professional network’, The Guardian, Tuesday, 1 March.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., L. Bornstein and J. Chapman, 2006, The Aid Chain: Coercion and Commitment in Development NGOs, Rugby: Intermediate Technology Development Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T. and J. Chapman, 2003, ‘Some realities behind the rhetoric of downward accountability’, Working paper presented at INTRAC 5th Evaluation Conference, Holland, 1st April 2003.
   Google Scholar
• William, A. and J. Taylor, 2013, ‘Resolving accountability ambiguity in the non-profit sector’, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 24, No. 1, doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9266-0.
   Google Scholar