Nature as a Subject of Rights? National Discourses on Ecuador’s Constitutional Rights of Nature

References

• Acción Ecologica, 2012, ‘Derechos para la naturaleza: 20 tesis iconoclastas’, http://www.accionecologica.org/naturaleza-con-derechos/articulos.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, A., 2011, Los Derechos de la Naturaleza: Una lectura sobre el derecho a la existencia, in A. Acosta and E. Martinez eds, La Naturaleza con Derechos: De la filosofía a la política, Quito: Abya-Yala, pp.317–367.
   Google Scholar
• Akchurin, M., 2015, ‘Constructing the rights of nature: Constitutional reform, mobilization, and environmental protection in Ecuador’, Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 937–968. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, P. and J. Z. Hopp, 2015, Ecuador: changing biosafety frames and new political forces in Correa's government, in B. Bull and M. Aguilar-Støen, ed, Environmental Politics in Latin America: Elite Dynamics, the Left Tide and Sustainable Development, London: Routledge, pp. 92–109.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila, R. S., 2011, El derecho de la naturaleza: fundamentos, in A. Acosta and E. Martínez eds, La Naturaleza con Derechos: De la filosofía a la política, Quito: Abya Yala, pp.173–238.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., 2012, Extractive industries, socio-environmental conflicts and political economic transformations in Andean America, in A. Bebbington, ed, Social Conflict, Economic Development and Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America, London: Routledge, pp. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Conaghan, C. M., 2011, Ecuador: Rafael correa and the citizens’ revolution, in S. Levitsky and K. M. Roberts eds, The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, pp.260–282.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, Rafael, 2006, Correa asume Presidencia tras insulante discurso en Zumbahau', El Telégrafo, January 14, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, J. and I. Crabtree-Condor, 2012, The politics of extractive industries in the Central Andes, in A. Bebbington, ed, Social Conflict, Economic Development and Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America, London: Routledge, pp. 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cubillo-Guevara, A. P. and A. L. Hidalgo-Capitán, 2015, ‘El Buen Vivir Como Alternativa al Desarrollo’, Perspectiva Socioecónomica, Vol. 2, pp. 5–27. doi: 10.21892/24627593.223
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., 2000, Green Political Thought, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L., 1996, Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., 2013, The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (3rd ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El Universo, 2008, ‘Alberto Acosta renuncia como presidente de la Asamblea’, https://www.eluniverso.com/2008/06/23/0001/8/B0D42E7B645B450BB8CC4DCD285C45EA.html.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, C., 2015, ‘Interpretive affinities: The constitutionalization of rights of nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2003, Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis of Social Research, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2010, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2016, A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer, Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (eds 3rd ed), London: Sage, pp.86–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fundación Pachamama, 2010, ‘Reconocimiento de los derechos de la naturaleza en la constitución ecuatoriana’, https://therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Espanol/Fundacion_Pachamama_Experiencia_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E., 2009, El mandato ecológico: Derechos de la Naturaleza y políticas ambientales en la nueva Constitución, Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, I., 2010, Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (3rd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IMF, 2017, ‘Ecuador. World Economic Outlook Database’, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/02/weodata/weoselser.aspx?c=248&t=1.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. and L. Phillips, 2002, Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, C. M. and P. L. Martin, 2017, ‘Can rights of nature make development more sustainable? Why some Ecuadorian lawsuits succeed and others fail’, World Development, Vol. 92, pp. 130–142. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzé, L. J. and P. V. Calzadilla, 2017, ‘Somewhere between rhetoric and reality: Environmental constitutionalism and the rights of nature in Ecuador’, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 401–433. doi: 10.1017/S2047102517000061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe, 2014, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lalander, R., 2014, ‘The Ecuadorian resource dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or development?’, Critical Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 4-5, pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalander, R. and J. Cuestas-Caza, 2017, Sumak Kawsay y Buen-Vivir en Ecuador, in A. D. V. Delgado, ed, Conocimientos ancestrales y procesos de desarrollo: Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador, Loja: Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, pp. 30–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lalander, R. and M. Merimaa, 2018, ‘The discursive paradox of environmental conflict: Between ecologism and economism in Ecuador’, Forum for Development Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 485–511. doi: 10.1080/08039410.2018.1427622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrea, C. and L. Warnars, 2009, ‘Ecuador's Yasuní-ITT Initiative: Avoiding emissions by keeping petroleum underground’, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Quang, M. and T. Vercoutère, 2013, Ecosocialismo y Buen Vivir: Diálogo entre dos alternativas al capitalismo, Quito: Editorial IAEN.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. L., 2016, Ecuador's Environmental Revolutions:. Ecoimperialists, Ecodependents, and Ecoresisters, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, M., 2009, Los Derechos de la Naturaleza en la nueva Constitución ecuatoriana, in A. Acosta and E. Martinez eds, Derechos de la Naturaleza: El futuro es ahora, Quito: Abya-Yala, pp.51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio del Ambiente, no date, ‘Los delitos ambientals en el nuevo código orgánico integral penal ecuatoriano’, http://sib.ambiente.gob.ec/file/TVS/6.-Raúl20Guaña-20Delitos20Ambientales20Código%20Penal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. and T. Velásquez, 2012, Sovereignty negotiated: anti-mining movements, the state and multinational mining companies under Correa's ‘21st Century Socialism’, in A. Bebbington, ed, Social Conflict, Economic Development and Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America, London: Routledge, pp. 112–133.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., 2001, Mening, materialitet, makt: En innføring i diskursanalyse, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Novo, C. M., 2014, ‘Managing diversity in postneoliberal Ecuador’, The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 103–125. doi: 10.1111/jlca.12062
   Google Scholar
• Payne, A. and N. Phillips, 2010, Development, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A., 2011, ‘Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador’, Geoforum, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• República del Ecuador, 2008, Constitución Política del Ecuador, Montecristi: Asamblea Nacional Constituyente.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Parga, J., 2014, Alternativas virtuales vs. cambios reales, Quito: Centro Andino de Acción Popular -CAAP-.
   Google Scholar
• Senplades, 2013a, National Plan for Good Living. Summarized Version, Quito: Senplades.
   Google Scholar
• Senplades, 2013b, Plan Nacional de Desarrollo / Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2013–2017, Quito: Senplades.
   Google Scholar
• Senplades, 2017, Toda una Vida: Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2017–2021, Quito: Senplades.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D., 2010, Doing Qualitative Research (3rd ed), London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., D. Horwarth and A. Norval, 2000, Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanasescu, M., 2013, ‘The rights of nature in Ecuador: The making of an idea’, International Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 70, No. 6, pp. 846–861. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank, 2016, ‘Data: Ecuador’, http://data.worldbank.org/country/ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• UN World Commission on Environment and Development, 1991, Our common future.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2017, ‘Ecuador: Analysis’, https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm?iso=ECU.
   Google Scholar
• Villalba-Eguiluz, C. U. and I. Etxano, 2017, ‘Buen Vivir vs development (II): The limits of (Neo-) extractivism’, Ecological Economics, Vol. 138, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar