Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample – comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2

References

• Nicholls TL, Brink J, Greaves C, et al. Forensic psychiatric inpatients and aggression: an exploration of incidence, prevalence, severity, and interventions by gender. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand S, Belfrage H. Comparison of HCR-20 scores in violent mentally disordered men and women: gender differences and similarities. Psychol Crime Law. 2001;7:71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selenius H, Leppänen Östman S, Strand S. Self-harm as a risk factor for inpatient aggression among women admitted to forensic psychiatric care. Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70:554–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffern M, Mayer MM, Martin T. A preliminary investigation into patterns of aggression in an Australian forensic psychiatric hospital. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2003;14:67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ose SO, Lilleeng S, Pettersen I, et al. Risk of violence among patients in psychiatric treatment: results from a national census. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel V, Lancel M. Gender differences in the assessment and manifestation of psychopathy: results from a multicenter study in forensic psychiatric patients. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2016;15:97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adshead G. Damage: trauma and violence in a sample of women referred to a forensic service. Behav Sci Law. 1994;12:235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens G, Picchioni M, Long C. Aggression in specialist secure and forensic inpatient mental health care: incidence across care pathways. J Forensic Pract. 2013;15:206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Beck NC, Hammer JH, Robbins S, et al. Highly aggressive women in a forensic psychiatric hospital. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2017;45:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffern M. The predictive validity and practical utility of structured schemes used to assess risk for aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings. Aggress Violent Behav. 2007;12:116–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JP, Desmarais SL, Hurducas C, et al. International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: a global survey of 44 countries. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2014;13:193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, et al. HCR- 20: assessing risk for violence. Version 2. 1997. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• O'Shea LE, Picchioni MM, Mason FL, et al. Differential predictive validity of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management Scales (HCR-20) for inpatient aggression. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220:669–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strub DS, Douglas KS, Nicholls TL. Violence risk assessment of civil psychiatric patients with the HCR-20: does gender matter?Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2016;15:81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren JI, South SC, Burnette ML, et al. Understanding the risk factors for violence and criminality in women: the concurrent validity of the PCL-R and HCR-20. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2005;28:269–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Reeves K. Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) violence risk assessment scheme. In: Otto RK, Douglas KS, editors. Handbook of violence risk assessment international perspectives on forensic mental health. 2010. p. 147–186. New York, USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Shaffer C, Blanchard AJE, et al.HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: overview and annotated bibliography. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grimbos T, Penney SR, Fernane S, et al. Gender comparisons in a forensic sample: patient profiles and HCR-20:V2 reliability and item utility. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2016;15:136–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls TL, Ogloff JRP, Douglas KS. Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: the HCR-20, PCL:SV, and VSC. Behav Sci Law. 2004;22:127–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap G, Lammers S, de Vogel V. Risk assessment in female forensic psychiatric patients: a quasi-prospective study into the validity of the HCR-20 and PCL-R. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2009;20:354–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel V, de Ruiter C. The HCR-20 in personality disordered female offenders: a comparison with a matched sample of males. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2005;12:226–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel V, Stam J, Bouman YHA, et al. Violent women: a multicentre study into gender differences in forensic psychiatric patients. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2016;27:145–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty KA, Woodhams J. The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;21:25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown A. Female offenders: assessment of risk in forensic settings. Aggress Violent Behav. 2010;15:422–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel V, de Vries Robbé M, van Kalmthout W, et al. FAM. Female Additional Manual. Additional guidelines to the HCR-20V3 for assessing risk for violence in women. Utrecht: Van der Hoeven Kliniek; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mansilla A, Rosenfeld B, Nicholls TL. Risk assessment: are current methods applicable to women?Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2009;8:50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten J, de Vogel V, Lancel M. Characteristics and offences of women with borderline personality disorder in forensic psychiatry: a multicentre study. Psychol Crime Law. 2016;22:224–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel V, Bruggeman M, Lancel M. Gender-sensitive violence risk assessment: predictive validity of six tools in female forensic psychiatric patients. Criminal Justice Behav. 2019;46:528–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand S, Belfrage H, Fransson G, et al. Clinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders - more important than actuarial data? A retrospective study of 40 mentally disordered offenders assessed with the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme. Legal Criminol Psychol. 1999;4:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Strand S, Belfrage H. Gender differences in psychopathy in a Swedish offender sample. Behav Sci Law. 2005;23:837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls TL, Ogloff JRP, Brink J, et al. Psychopathy in women: a review of its clinical usefulness for assessing risk for aggression and criminality. Behav Sci Law. 2005;23:779–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray NS, Snowden RJ. Psychopathy in women: prediction of criminality and violence in UK and USA psychiatric patients resident in the community. Psychiatry Res. 2016;237:339–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillbrandM. Overlap between suicidial behavior and interpersonal violence. In: Nock MK, editor. The Oxford handbook of suicide and self-injury. New York, US: Oxford University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon Gordon K, Harrison N, Roesch R. Non-suicidal self-injury within offender populations: a systematic review. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2012;11:33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James K, Stewart D, Bowers L. Self-harm and attempted suicide within inpatient psychiatric services: a review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012;21:301–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice ME, Harris GT. Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s D, and R. Law and Human Behaviour. 2005;29:615–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar