Attitudes toward standardized assessment tools and their use among clinicians in a public mental health service

References

• Gondek D, Edbrooke-Childs J, Fink E, et al. Feedback from outcome measures and treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice: a systematic review. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016;43:325–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Hawkins EJ, et al. Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10:288–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Kleinstäuber M. Collecting and delivering progress feedback: a meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy. 2018;55:520–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen-Doss A. Practical, evidence-based clinical decision making: introduction to the special series. Cogn Behav Pract. 2015;22:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA. Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures: national survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:101–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield DR, Ogles BM. The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2004;35:485–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionita G, Fitzpatrick M. Bringing science to clinical practice: a Canadian survey of psychological practice and usage of progress monitoring measures. Can Psychol. 2014;55:187–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen-Doss A, Haimes EMB, Smith AM, et al. Monitoring treatment progress and providing feedback is viewed favorably but rarely used in practice. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018;45:48–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen-Doss A, Smith AM, Becker-Haimes EM, et al. Individualized progress measures are more acceptable to clinicians than standardized measures: results of a national survey. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018;45:392–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM. Understanding barriers to evidence-based assessment: clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;39:885–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson M, Månsdotter A, Fransson E, et al. Clinicians’ attitudes toward standardized assessment and diagnosis within child and adolescent psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019;13:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaskinn A, Egeland J, Nielsen GH, et al. Norske psykologers bruk av tester. Tidsskr Norsk Psykologforening. 2010;47:1010–1016.
   Google Scholar
• Vaskinn A, Egeland J. Testbruksundersøkelsen: en oversikt over tester brukt av norske psykologer. Tidsskr Norsk Psykologforening. 2012;49:658–665.
   Google Scholar
• Edbrooke-Childs J, Barry D, Rodriguez IM, et al. Patient reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: associations between clinician demographic characteristics, attitudes and efficacy. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2017;22:36–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell JF, Kraus DR, Miller SD, et al. Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychother Res. 2015;25:6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoun S, Pennebaker D, Janca A. Outcome measurement in rural mental health care: a field trial of rooming-in models. Aust J Rural Health. 2002;10:302–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willis A, Deane FP, Coomps T. Improving clinicians’ attitudes toward providing feedback on routine outcome assessments. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2009;18:211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systemic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:508–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland AE, Kruse M, Aarons GA. Clinicians and outcome measurement: what’s the use? J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003;30:393–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon AR, Dorsey S, Pullman M, et al. Clinician use of standardized assessments following a common elements psychotherapy training and consultation program. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42:47–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corporator. Corporator Surveyor version 3.3.7x. Stavanger; Norway: Corporator AS; 2016. https://corporator.com/en/
   Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman WK, Ollendick TH. Evidence-based assessment of anxiety and its disorders in children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005;34:380–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon AR, Ludwig K, Wasse JK, et al. Determinants and functions of standardized assessment use among school mental health clinicians: a mixed methods evaluation. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016;43:122–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples E, Qin C, Goveas V, et al. A qualitative exploration of attitudes towards the use of outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;22:219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltu C, Veseth M, Stefansen J, et al. This is what I need a clinical feedback system to do for me: a qualitative inquiry into therapists’ and patients’ perspectives. Psychother Res. 2018;28:250–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eglit GML, Palmer BW, Jeste DV. Overview of measurement-based positive psychiatry. Nordic J Psychiatry. 2018;72:396–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Monahan PO, Kean J. Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:1085–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amble I, Gude T, Stubdal S, et al. The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: a multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Psychother Res. 2015;26:669–677.
   Google Scholar
• Beck P, Austin SF, Lau ME. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): examination of the psychometric properties of two measures for burden of symptoms and quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety. Nordic J Psychiatry. 2018;72:251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattland H, Koksvik JM, Burkeland O, et al. The effects of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) on therapy outcomes in the course of an implementation process: a randomized clinical trial. J Counsel Psychol. 2018;65:641–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar