The Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale – self-assessment for use in adolescents: an evaluation of psychometric and diagnostic accuracy

References

• Staller JA. Diagnostic profiles in outpatient child psychiatry. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006;76(1):98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis M. Child and adolescent psychiatry: a comprehensive textbook. Fourth edition, Martin A., Volkman F.R, editors. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002: 503–513
   Google Scholar
• Lundervold AJ, Breivik K, Posserud MB, et al. Symptoms of depression as reported by Norwegian adolescents on the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire. Front Psychol. 2013;4:613–24062708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barn- och ungdomspsykiatrins metoder En nationell inventering. [Child and adolescent psychiatry’s methods. National Inventory] Västerås: Socialstyrelsen; 2009. Available from: https://docplayer.se/994912-Barn-och-ungdomspsykiatrins-metoder-en-nationell-inventering.html.
   Google Scholar
• Diagnostik och uppföljning av förstämningssyndrom En systemisk litteratur översikt. [Diagnostics and follow-up of affektive disorders: a systemic literature overview]. Stockholm: SBU Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT. Cognitive therapy of depression (The Guilford clinical psychology and psychotherapy series, 99-0267920-X). New York: Guilford; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Bondolfi G, Jermann F, Rouget BW, et al. Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: evaluation in clinical practice. J Affect Disord. 2010;121(3):268–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham JL, Wernroth L, von Knorring L, et al. Agreement between physicians’ and patients’ ratings on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. J Affect Disord. 2011;135(1–3):148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller HJ. Rating depressed patients: observer- vs self-assessment. Eur Psychiatry. 2000;15(3):160–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody TJ, Rush AJ, Bernstein I, et al. The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;16(8):601–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134(4):382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JB, Kobak KA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA). Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(1):52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantino B, Moore N. The self-reported Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale is a useful evaluative tool in Major Depressive Disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2009;9(1):26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila-Evenden M, Svanborg P, Gustavsson P, et al. Determinants of self-rating and expert rating concordance in psychiatric out-patients, using the affective subscales of the CPRS. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;94(6):386–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanborg P, Asberg M. A new self-rating scale for depression and anxiety states based on the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994;89(1):21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanborg P, Asberg M. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord. 2001;64(2–3):203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikberg C, Nejati S, Larsson ME, et al. Comparison between the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and the Beck Depression Inventory II in primary care. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015; 17(3): 10.4088/PCC.14m01758. Published online 2015 Jun 25. doi: 10.4088/PCC.14m01758
   Google Scholar
• Yee A, Yassim AR, Loh HS, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-BM). BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarbin H, Von Knorring A-L, Zetterqvist M. Riktlinje Depression 2014 [Guidelines depression 2014]. Svenska föreningen för barn- och ungdomspsykiatri [Swedish Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry]; 2014. Available from: http://www.sfbup.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SFBUPRiktlinjeDepression2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosini PJ. Historical development and present status of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39(1):49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres Soler C, Olofsdotter S, Vadlin S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale parent report among adolescent psychiatric outpatients. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;72(3):184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövenhag S. Substance use in Swedish adolescents: the importance of co-occurring psychiatric symptoms and psychosocial risk. Uppsala, Uppsala University; 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:806551/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Gatsonis CA, et al. STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts. BMJ. 2017;358:j3751.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, et al. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(7):980–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YS, Cheon KA, Kim BN, et al. The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version-Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K). Yonsei Med J. 2004;45(1):81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasil HH, Bordin IA. Convergent validity of K-SADS-PL by comparison with CBCL in a Portuguese speaking outpatient population. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10(1):83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarbin H, Andersson M, Rastam M, et al. Predictive validity of the K-SADS-PL 2009 version in school-aged and adolescent outpatients. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71(4):270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauth B, Arnkelsson GB, Magnusson P, et al. Validity of K-SADS-PL (Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime Version) depression diagnoses in an adolescent clinical population. Nord J Psychiatry. 2010;64(6):409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanczyk GV, Eizirik M, Aranovich V, et al. Interrater agreement for the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia epidemiological version for school-age children (K-SADS-E). Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2003;25(2):87–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanee N, Apter A, Weizman A. Psychometric properties of the K-SADS-PL in an Israeli adolescent clinical population. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1997;34(3):179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa RE, Ortiz S, Higuera F, et al. [Interrater reliability of the Spanish version of Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL)] . Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2006;34(1):36–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragh K, Husby M, Melin K, et al. Convergent and divergent validity of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children – present and lifetime version diagnoses in a sample of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019;73(2):111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D. Kiddie-Sads – Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). Diagnostic Interview Version 1.0 of October 1996. [cited 2020 Feb 24]. Available from: http://www.icctc.org/PMM%20Handouts/Kiddie-SADS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnby K, Skordas K, Olofsdotter S, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale for adolescents. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(3):216–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(5):423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Faris P, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 4th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Altman A, Douglas G. Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell I. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Statist Med. 2007;26(19):3661–3675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JT. The analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables–yet again. Statist Med. 2011;30(8):890–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JJ, Pett MA, Lackey NR. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Runeson B. Interview instrument provides no reliable assessment of suicide risk. Scientific support is lacking according to report from the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Lakartidningen. 2015;112:26646963.
   Google Scholar
• Colrain IM, Baker FC. Changes in sleep as a function of adolescent development. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21(1):5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl RE, Lewin DS. Pathways to adolescent health sleep regulation and behavior. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31(6):175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DSM-IV-TR diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Text Revision. Washington, DC; American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5 (R)). 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; Arlington, VA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mahone EM, Wodka EL. The neurobiological profile of girls with ADHD. Dev Disabil Res Revs. 2008;14(4):276–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biederman J, Ball SW, Mick E, et al. Informativeness of maternal reports on the diagnosis of ADHD: an analysis of mother and youth reports. J Atten Disord. 2007;10(4):410–417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yap MB, Reavley N, Jorm AF. Where would young people seek help for mental disorders and what stops them? Findings from an Australian national survey. J Affect Disord. 2013;147(1–3):255–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10(1):113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutz W, Walinder J, Rhimer Z, et al. Male depression–stress reaction combined with serotonin deficiency?. Lakartidningen. 1999;96(10):1177–1178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar