Evaluation of the SCL-9S, a short version of the symptom checklist-90-R, on psychiatric patients in Sweden by using Rasch analysis

References

• Barry V, Stout ME, Lynch ME, et al. The effect of psychological distress on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Health Psychol. 2020;25(2):227–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R, administration, scoring and procedures manual-II for the R(evised) version and other instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series. Townson: Clinical Psychometric Research;1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bonynge ER. Unidimensionality of SCL‐90‐R scales in adult and adolescent crisis samples. J Clin Psychol. 1993;49(2):212–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits IA, Timmerman ME, Barelds DP, et al. The Dutch symptom checklist-90-revised. Is the use of the Subscales Justified? Eur J Psychol Assess. 2015;31(4):263–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbán R, Kun B, Farkas J, et al. Bifactor structural model of symptom checklists: SCL-90-R and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in a non-clinical community sample. Psychiatry Res. 2014;216(1):146–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrindell WA, Urbán R, Carrozzino D, et al. SCL-90-R emotional distress ratings in substance use and impulse control disorders: one-factor, oblique first-order, higher-order, and bi-factor models compared. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:173–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Waller G, Meyer C, Ohanian V. Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cogn Ther Res. 2001;25(2):137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller JM, Postert C, Beyer T, et al. Comparison of eleven short versions of the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R) for use in the assessment of general psychopathology. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010;32(2):246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz U, Nutzinger DO, Schulz H, et al. Comparative psychometric analyses of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in patients with affective disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(1):104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sereda Y, Dembitskyi S. Validity assessment of the symptom checklist SCL-90-R and shortened versions for the general population in Ukraine. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen CS, Drescher KD, Moos RH, et al. Six- and ten-item indexes of psychological distress based on the Symptom Checklist-90. Assessment. 2000;7(2):103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt J, Gerbershagen HU. Cross-validation of the SCL- 27: a short psychometric screening instrument for chronic pain patients. Eur J Pain. 2001;5(2):187–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR, Spencer P. Brief symptom inventory: BSI. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 19 93.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR. The Brief-Symptom-Inventory-18 (BSI-18): administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems: MN; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):299–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klaghofer R, Brähler E. Konstruktion und Teststatistische Prüfung einer Kurzform der SCL-90-R. Psychiatrie Und Psychotherapie. 2001;49:115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Pampliega A, Herrero-Fernández D, Martín S, et al. Psychometrics of the SCL-90-R and development and testing of brief versions SCL-45 and SCL-9 in Infertile Couples. Nurs Res. 2019;68(4):E1–E10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap MC, Meijer RR, Cohen-Kettenis PT, et al. Why the factorial structure of the SCL-90-R is unstable: comparing patient groups with different levels of psychological distress using Mokken Scale Analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200(2-3):819–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Kiuse J, et al. The symptom check-list-90-R (SCL-90-R): a German validation study. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(2):185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott R, Fox CM, Beltyukova SA, et al. Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(4):359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Vol. 26. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (second edition). Int J Testing. 2018;18(2):101–134.
   Google Scholar
• Fridell M, Cesarec Z, Johansson M, et al. SCL-90. Svensk Normering. Standardisering och Validering av Symtomskalan [SCL 90. Swedish Normalisation, Standardisation and Validation of the Symptom Scale.]. Stockholm: Statens Institutionsstyrelse SiS; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rytilä-Manninen M, Fröjd S, Haravuori H, et al. Psychometric properties of the Symptom Checklist-90 in adolescent psychiatric in-patients and age-and gender-matched community youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2016;10(1):23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhard Jr G. Invariant measurement: using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 20 07.
   Google Scholar
• Karami H. An introduction to differential item functioning. Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2012;11(2):59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell A, Muncer S. Intent to harm or injure? Gender and the expression of anger. Aggress Behav. 2008;34(3):282–293.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2016. Suicide data. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/
   Google Scholar
• Kopta SM, Howard KI, Lowry JL, et al. Patterns of symptomatic recovery in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(5):1009–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar