The Partners for Change Outcome Management System in the psychotherapeutic treatment of cannabis use: a pilot effectiveness randomized clinical trial

References

• World Health Organization. 2020. The health and social effects of nonmedical cannabis use. Advance online publication. https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/cannabis_report/en/
   Google Scholar
• Broyd SJ, van Hell HH, Beale C, et al. Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on human cognition - a systematic review. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79(7):557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade C. Cannabis and neuropsychiatry, 2: the longitudinal risk of psychosis as an adverse outcome. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(06):e739–e742.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2007. NICE clinical guideline 51: drug misuse: psychosocial interventions. London: NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg51/evidence/drug-misuse-psychosocial-interventions-full-guideline-195261805.
   Google Scholar
• Chatters R, Cooper K, Day E, et al. Psychological and psychosocial interventions for cannabis cessation in adults: a systematic review. Addict Res Theory. 2016;24(2):93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis ML, Powers MB, Handelsman P, et al. Behavioral therapies for treatment-seeking cannabis users: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eval Health Prof. 2015;38(1):94–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark MJ. Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: a clinically oriented review. Clin Psychol Rev. 1992;12(1):93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins EJ, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR. Concurrent monitoring of psychological distress and satisfaction measures as predictors of addiction treatment retention. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008;35(2):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD. Treatment for drug abuse: Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(8):875–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorson HH, Ajo Arnevik E, Rand-Hendriksen K, et al. Drop-out from addiction treatment: a systematic review of risk factors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(8):1010–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahler GJ, Mennis J, DuCette JP. Residential and outpatient treatment completion for substance use disorders in the U.S.: moderation analysis by demographics and drug of choice. Addict Behav. 2016;58:129–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castonguay LG, Barkham M, Lutz W, et al. Practice-oriented research: approaches and applications. In MJ Lambert, editor. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 6rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 85–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz W, de Jong K, Rubel J. Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: where are we and where do we want to go? Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey TJG, Wampold BE, Lichtenberg JW, et al. Expertise in psychotherapy: an elusive goal? Am Psychol. 2014;69(3):218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield D, McCullough L, Frantz SHB, et al. Do we know when our clients get worse? An investigation of therapists’ ability to detect negative client change. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;17(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan C, Lambert MJ, Harmon C, et al. A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. J Clin Psychol. 2005;61(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drapeau M. The value of progress tracking in psychotherapy. Integr Sci Pract. 2012;2(2):5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Morton JJ, Hatfield DR, et al. 2004. Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2 (Outcome Questionnaire). Salt Lake City (UT): OQ Measures, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SD, Duncan BL. 2004. The outcome and session rating scales: administration and scoring manual. Chicago: Institute for the Study of Therapeutic Change.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT). 2020. https://socialstyrelsen.dk/tvaergaende-omrader/dokumenterede-metoder-voksne-og-handicap/om/feedback-informed-treatment-fit
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Feedback informed treatment - En metode i vaekst. SocialAnalyse. 2017;3:3.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SD, Duncan BL, Brown J, et al. The Outcome Rating Scale: a preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. J Brief Ther. 2003;2:91–100. Retrieved from http://journalbrieftherapy.com
   Google Scholar
• Duncan BL, Miller SD, Sparks JA, et al. The session rating scale: preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measure. J Brief Ther. 2003;3(1):3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan BL, Miller SD, Wampold BE, et al. 2010. The heart and soul of change: delivering what works in therapy. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick T, El-Gohary M, Stuart B, et al. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD011119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy. 2011;48(1):72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Kleinstäuber M. Collecting and delivering progress feedback: a meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy. 2018;55(4):520–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pejtersen JH, Viinholt BCA, Hansen H. Feedback-informed treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the partners for change outcome management system. J Counsel Psychol. 2020;67(6):723–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam HE, Ronan K. The application of a feedback-informed approach in psychological service with youth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;55:41–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård OK, Randa H, Hougaard E. The effect of using the Partners for Change Outcome Management System as feedback tool in psychotherapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychother Res. 2020;30(2):195–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård OK, Hougaard E. The evidence for the partners for change outcome management system is insufficient: reply to Duncan and Sparks (2020). Psychol Serv. 2020;12(4):497–498.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman DL, Slone NC, Reese RJ, et al. Efficacy of client feedback in group psychotherapy with soldiers referred for substance abuse treatment. Psychother Res. 2015;25(4):396–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singal AG, Higgins PDR, Waljee AK. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Translat Gastroenterol. 2014;5(1):e45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337(nov11 2):a2390–a2390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stout RL, Wirtz PW, Carbonari JP, et al. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;12:70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Consolidation Act on Social Services Part 18, art. 101. Ministry of Social Affairs and the Interior, file no. 2015-4958. http://www.english.sm.dk/media/14900/consolidation-act-on-social-services.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen MU, Pedersen MM. 2013. Effekten af hashbehandling: En randomiseret undersøgelse af client-directed outcome-informed behandling af hashmisbrug [The effect of cannabis treatment: a randomized study of client-directed outcome-informed treatment of cannabis abuse]. Aarhus (Denmark): Center for Rusmiddelforskning, School of Business and Social Science, Aarhus University. https://psy.au.dk/fileadmin/site_files/filer_rusmiddelforskning/dokumenter/rapporter/2013/2_Effekten_af_hashbehandling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davidsen AH, Poulsen S, Lindschou J, et al. Feedback in group psychotherapy for eating disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(5):484–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkevi A, Hartgers C. EuropASI: European adaptation of a Multidimensional Assessment Instrument for drug and alcohol dependence. Eur Addict Res. 1995;1(4):208–210.
   Google Scholar
• Rikoon SH, Cacciola JS, Carise D, et al. Predicting DSM-IV dependence diagnoses from Addiction Severity Index composite scores. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;31(1):17–24..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Counsel Psychol. 1989;36(2):223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård OK, O’Toole MS, Svendsen MM, et al. The effect of implementing the Partners for Change Outcome Management System in a nationwide student counseling service. J Counsel Psychol. 2020;67(1):90–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel JA, Andrews WP, Owen J, et al. Preliminary validation of the Rating of Outcome Scale and equivalence of ultra-brief measures of well-being. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(1):65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson K, Perry A, Bell L. Would continuous feedback of patient’s clinical outcomes to practitioners improve NHS psychological therapy services? Critical analysis and assessment of quality of existing studies. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2015;88(1):21–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oenen FJ, Schipper S, van R, et al. Feedback-informed treatment in emergency psychiatry; a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjaastad JF, Jensen-Doss A, Moltu C, et al. Attitudes toward standardized assessment tools and their use among clinicians in a public mental health service. Nordic J Psychiatry. 2019;73(7):387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong K, van Sluis P, Nugter MA, et al. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Res. 2012;22(4):464–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleacher AA, Olin SS, Nadeem E, et al. Implementing a measurement feedback system in community mental health clinics: a case study of multilevel barriers and facilitators. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;43(3):426–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattland H, Koksvik JM, Burkeland O, et al. The effects of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) on therapy outcomes in the course of an implementation process: a randomized clinical trial. J Counsel Psychol. 2018;65(5):641–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She Z, Duncan BL, Reese RJ, et al. Client feedback in China: a randomized clinical trial in a college counseling center. J Counsel Psychol. 2018;65(6):727–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan BL, Sparks JA. When meta-analysis misleads: a critical case study of a meta-analysis of client feedback. Psychol Serv. 2020;17(4):487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SD, Hubble MA, Chow D. The question of expertise in psychotherapy. J Expert. 2018;1(2):121–129.
   Google Scholar