Finnish Psychotherapy Quality Register: rationale, development, and baseline results

References

• Cuijpers P. Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression: an overview of a series of meta-analyses. Can Psychol. 2017;58(1):7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Bergin AE. 2013. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/helsinki-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1162080
   Google Scholar
• Nathan PE, Gorman JM. 2015. A guide to treatments that work. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/helsinki-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3564597
   Google Scholar
• Cuijpers P. The challenges of improving treatments for depression. JAMA. 2018;320(24):2529–2530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo J, Lutz W. A development pathway towards precision mental health care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(9):889–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. The improving access to psychological therapies manual; 2021. Available from: https://www.England.Nhs.Uk/Publication/the-Improving-Access-to-Psychological-Therapies-Manual/; https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/the-improving-access-to-psychological-therapies-manual/
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo J, Huey D, Bennett H, et al. Case complexity as a guide for psychological treatment selection. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(9):835–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz W, Rubel JA, Schwartz B, et al. Towards integrating personalized feedback research into clinical practice: development of the trier treatment navigator (TTN). Behav Res Ther. 2019;120:103438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuijpers P, Reijnders M, Huibers MJH. The role of common factors in psychotherapy outcomes. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:207–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph P, Connolly Gibbons MB. 2021. Psychotherapy process-outcome research: advances in understanding causal connections. In: Barkham M, Lutz W, Castonguay LG, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Vol. 2021. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. p. 263–295.
   Google Scholar
• Cuijpers P, Driessen E, Hollon SD, et al. The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32(4):280–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold BE. How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(3):270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DM. Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:159–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield S, Kellett S, Simmonds-Buckley M, et al. Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021;60(1):e12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baigent M, Smith D, Battersby M, et al. The Australian version of IAPT: clinical outcomes of the multi-site cohort study of NewAccess. J Ment Health. 2020;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Knapstad M, Nordgreen T, Smith ORF. Prompt mental health care, the Norwegian version of IAPT: clinical outcomes and predictors of change in a multicenter cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobori O, Nakazato M, Yoshinaga N, et al. Transporting cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and the improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) project to Japan: preliminary observations and service evaluation in Chiba. J Ment Health Train Educ Pract. 2014;9(3):155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Saarni SI, Nurminen S, Mikkonen K, et al. The Finnish therapy navigator—digital support system for introducing stepped care in Finland. Psychiatria Fennica. 2022;53:120–137.
   Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland & Harpf. Statistical yearbook of the social insurance institution 2020; 2021, p. 490. Available from: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/336533/Kelan_tilastollinen_vuosikirja_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BCB Medical; 2021. Available from: https://bcbmedical.com/
   Google Scholar
• Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, et al. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman SB, Cissell SH, Means-Christensen AJ, et al. Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriston L, Hölzel L, Weiser A-K, et al. Meta-analysis: are 3 questions enough to detect unhealthy alcohol use? Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(12):879–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Fairburn CG. Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. Guilford Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura J, Green MF, Shaner A, et al. Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: ‘the drift busters’. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1993;3(4):221–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohus M, Kleindienst N, Limberger MF, et al. The short version of the borderline symptom list (BSL-23): development and initial data on psychometric properties. Psychopathology. 2009;42(1):32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss DS. The impact of event scale: revised. In: Cross-cultural assessment of psychological trauma and PTSD. Springer Science + Business Media; 2007. p. 219–238.
   Google Scholar
• Foa EB, Huppert JD, Leiberg S, et al. The obsessive-compulsive inventory: development and validation of a short version. Psychol Assess. 2002;14(4):485–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa TA, Katherine Shear M, Barlow DH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for interpretation of the panic disorder severity scale. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(10):922–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, et al. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6):487–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijenhuis ER, Spinhoven P, Van Dyck R, et al. The development and psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20). J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996;184(11):688–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor KM, Davidson JR, Churchill LE, et al. Psychometric properties of the social phobia inventory (SPIN). New Self-Rating Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg E, Barkham M, Bewick BM, et al. The young person’s CORE: development of a brief outcome measure for young people. Counsel Psychother Res. 2009;9(3):160–168.
   Google Scholar
• Pirskanen M, Laukkanen E, Pietilä A-M. A formative evaluation to develop a school health nursing early intervention model for adolescent substance use. Public Health Nurs. 2007;24(3):256–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabacoff RI, Miller IW, Bishop DS, et al. A psychometric study of the McMaster family assessment device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. J Fam Psychol. 1990;3(4):431–439.
   Google Scholar
• Spence SH. Structure of anxiety symptoms among children: a confirmatory factor-analytic study. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106(2):280–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewy RL, Pearson R, Vinogradov S, et al. Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire – Brief Version (PQ-B). Schizophr Res. 2011;129(1):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskelainen M, Sourander A, Kaljonen A. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish school-aged children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;9(4):277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, et al. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(8):835–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo J, Overend K, Lucock M, et al. Improving the efficiency of psychological treatment using outcome feedback technology. Behav Res Ther. 2017;99:89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenström TH, Ritola V, Saarni S, et al. Measurement invariant but non-normal treatment responses in guided internet psychotherapies for depressive and generalized anxiety disorders. Assessment. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet-Pelletier J-C, Cousineau D. A review of effect sizes and their confidence intervals, part I: the Cohen’s d family. Quant Methods Psychol. 2018;14(4):242–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Sills L, Norman SB, Craske MG, et al. Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). J Affect Disord. 2009;112(1–3):92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honkalampi K, Laitila A, Juntunen H, et al. The Finnish clinical outcome in routine evaluation outcome measure: psychometric exploration in clinical and non-clinical samples. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71(8):589–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS England. Psychological therapies. A guide to IAPT data and publications. NHS Digital; 2021. Available from: https://nhs-prod.global.ssl.fastly.net/binaries/content/assets/website-assets/data-and-information/data-sets/iapt/guide-to-iapt-data-and-publications.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obbarius A, van Maasakkers L, Baer L, et al. Standardization of health outcomes assessment for depression and anxiety: recommendations from the ICHOM Depression and Anxiety Working Group. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(12):3211–3225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone C, Simmonds-Buckley M, Thwaites R, et al. Dynamic prediction of psychological treatment outcomes: development and validation of a prediction model using routinely collected symptom data. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(4):e231–e240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delgadillo J, McMillan D, Gilbody S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of feedback-informed psychological treatment: evidence from the IAPT-FIT trial. Behav Res Ther. 2021;142:103873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar